Science, Values, and Citizens

Chapter
Part of the The Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science book series (WONS, volume 81)

Abstract

Science is one of the most important forces in contemporary society. The most reliable source of knowledge about the world, science shapes the technological possibilities before us, informs public policy, and is crucial to measuring the efficacy of public policy. Yet it is not a simple repository of facts on which we can draw. It is an ongoing process of evidence gathering, discovery, contestation, and criticism. I will argue that an understanding of the nature of science and the scientific process should be the central goal for scientific literacy, rather than a grasp of specific (often disciplinary) facts. With this understanding of science as a backdrop, the paper then turns to modes for citizen engagement with science. This paper articulates different ways citizens can engage with science, including four avenues for legitimate contestation of scientific claims. I then look more closely at contestation of science on the basis of values. That science can be legitimately contested by non-experts on a range of grounds means that science communication should not just aim at getting citizens to accept scientific claims, but rather to engage in a more robust two-way conversation about science.

References

  1. Achenbach, J. 2015. The Age of Disbelief. National Geographic, March Issue, 227: 30–47.Google Scholar
  2. Bauer, M.W., N. Allum, and S. Miller. 2007. What Can We Learn From 25 Years of PUS Survey Research? Liberating and Expanding the Agenda. Public Understanding of Science 16(1): 79–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blackawton, P.S., S. Airzee, A. Allen, et al. 2011. Blackawton Bees. Biology Letters 7(2): 168–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolsen, T., J.N. Druckman, and F.L. Cook. 2015. Citizens’, Scientists’, and Policy Advisors’ Beliefs About Global Warming. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 658(1): 271–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clifford, W.K. 1877. The Ethics of Belief. In The Ethics of Belief and Other Essays, ed. T. Madigan, 70–96. Amherst: Prometheus.Google Scholar
  6. Deer, B. 2011. Secrets of the MMR Scare: How the Case Against the MMR Vaccine Was Fixed. British Medical Journal 342: c5347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). 2013. An Assessment of Key Evidence About Neonicotinoids and Bees. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/an-assessment-of-key-evidence-about-neonicotinoids-and-bees.
  8. Dickinson, J.L., and R. Bonney. 2012. Citizen Science: Public Participation in Environmental Research. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Douglas, H. 2009. Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 2014. Scientific Integrity in a Politicized World. In Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Congress, ed. Peter Schroeder-Heister, Gerhard Heinzmann, Wilfrid Hodges, and Pierre Edouard Bour, 253–268. London: College Publications.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 2015. Politics & Science: Untangling Values, Ideologies, and Reasons. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 658: 296–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). 2013. EFSA Guidance Document on the Risk Assessment of Plant Protection Products on Bees (Apis mellifera, Bombus spp. and solitary bees). http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/3295.
  13. Goldenberg, M. 2016. Public Misunderstanding of Science? Reframing the Problem of Vaccine Hesitancy. Perspectives on Science 24: 552–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. IOM (Institute of Medicine– Immunization Safety Review Committee). 2004. Immunization Safety Review: Vaccines and Autism. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  15. James, W. 1896. The Will to Believe: And Other Essays in Popular Philosophy. New York: Longmans, Green & Company.Google Scholar
  16. Kahan, D.M., E. Peters, M. Wittlin, P. Slovic, L.L. Ouellette, D. Braman, and G. Mandel. 2012. The Polarizing Impact of Science Literacy and Numeracy on Perceived Climate Change Risks. Nature Climate Change 2(10): 732–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Longino, H.E. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 2002. The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Miller, S. 2001. Public Understanding of Science at the Crossroads. Public Understanding of Science 10(1): 115–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Miller, J.D. 2004. Public Understanding of, and Attitudes Toward, Scientific Research: What We Know and What We Need to Know. Public Understanding of Science 13(3): 273–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Miller, B., and I. Record. 2013. Justified Belief in a Digital Age: On the Epistemic Implications of Secret Internet Technologies. Episteme 10(02): 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pew Research Center. 2015. Public and Scientists’ Views on Science and Society, January 29, 2015.Google Scholar
  23. Schweingruber, H., T. Keller, and H. Quinn, ed. 2012. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, D.C: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  24. Shen, Helen. 2013. Inequality Quantified: Mind the Gender Gap. Nature 495: 22–24. http://www.nature.com/news/inequality-quantified-mind-the-gender-gap-1.12550.
  25. Smith, T., and J. Son. 2013. General Social Survey 2012 Final Report: Trends in Public Attitudes About Confidence in Institutions. Chicago: NORC at the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  26. Solomon, M. 2001. Social Empiricism. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Google Scholar
  27. Stegenga, J. 2016. Hollow Hunt for Harms. Perspectives on Science 24: 481–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Thagard, P. 1998. Ulcers and Bacteria I: Discovery and Acceptance. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 29(1): 107–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Trautmann, N.M., J.L. Shirk, J. Fee, and M.E. Krasny. 2012. Who Poses the Question? Using Citizen Science to Help K-12 Teachers Meet the Mandate for Inquiry. In Citizen Science: Public Participation in Environmental Research, ed. Dickinson and Bonney, 179–190. Ithaca: Comstock Publishing Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wilholt, T. 2013. Epistemic Trust in Science. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64(2): 233–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wynne, B. 1996. Misunderstood Misunderstandings: Social Identities and the Public Uptake of Science. In Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology, ed. A. Irwin and B. Wynne. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations