Advertisement

Intra-Vehicle Wireless Sensor Network Communication Quality Assessment via Packet Delivery Ratio Measurements

  • Stefan Reis
  • Dirk Pesch
  • Bernd-Ludwig Wenning
  • Michael Kuhn
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 191)

Abstract

For the development of reliable intra-vehicle low power wireless communication protocols, realistic wireless channel models are required. In this article, we present measurements taken in two different vehicles (compact passenger cars), one with a petrol and the other with an electric engine, with the aim to develop such channel models. We measured the received signal strength indicator (RSSI) and packet delivery ratio (PDR) values for several channel and communication settings, e.g. varying IEEE 802.15.4 channels, transmit power levels, packet sizes and different levels of Wi-Fi interference. We observed several unique characteristics of the wireless channel behaviour, resulting in separate zones inside the vehicle with similar behaviour, effects due to different types of engines and observed the impact of charging the electric car.

Keywords

RSSI SNR PDR Intra-vehicle low power wireless communication Wireless channel behaviour IEEE 802.15.4 

References

  1. 1.
    Lu, N., Cheng, N., Zhang, N., Shen, X., Mark, J.W.: Connected vehicles: Solutions and challenges. IEEE Internet Things J. 1(4), 289–299 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Demir, U., Bas, C., Ergen, S.: Engine compartment UWB channel model for intravehicular wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 63(6), 2497–2505 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tsai, H.M., Viriyasitavat, W., Tonguz, O., Saraydar, C., Talty, T., Macdonald, A.: Feasibility of in-car wireless sensor networks: A statistical evaluation. In: 2007 4th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, SECON 2007, pp. 101–111, June 2007Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bas, C., Ergen, S.: Ultra-wideband channel model for intra-vehicular wireless sensor networks beneath the chassis: From statistical model to simulations. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 62(1), 14–25 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blumenstein, J., Mikulasek, T., Marsalek, R., Prokes, A., Zemen, T., Mecklen-braeuker, C.: In-vehicle mm-wave channel model and measurement. In: 2014 IEEE 80th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall), pp. 1–5, September 2014Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sawada, H., Tomatsu, T., Ozaki, G., Nakase, H., Kato, S., Sato, K., Harada, H.: A sixty GHz intra-car multi-media communications system. In: 2009 IEEE 69th Vehicular Technology Conference, VTC Spring 2009, pp. 1–5, April 2009Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tsai, H.M., Saraydar, C., Talty, T., Ames, M., Macdonald, A., Tonguz, O.K.: ZigBee-based intra-car wireless sensor network. In: 2007 IEEE International Conference on Communications, pp. 3965–3971, June 2007Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tsai, H.M.: Intra-car Wireless Sensor Networks. Ph.D. thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    de Francisco, R., Huang, L., Dolmans, G.: Coexistence of ZigBee wireless sensor networks and Bluetooth inside a vehicle. In: IEEE 20th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, pp. 2700–2704, September 2009Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D’Errico, R., Rudant, L., Keignart, J.: Channel characterization for intra-vehicle WSNs in the ISM bands. In: Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Antennas and Propagation, pp. 1–5, April 2010Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rao, T.R., Balachander, D., Sathish, P., Tiwari, N.: Intra-vehicular RF propagation measurements at UHF for wireless sensor networks. In: 2012 International Conference on Recent Advances in Computing and Software Systems (RACSS), pp. 214–218, April 2012Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aldeeb, W., Xiang, W., Richardson, P.: A study on the channel and BER-SNR performance of ultra wide band systems applied in commercial vehicles. In: 2007 IEEE Sarnoff Symposium, pp. 1–5, April 2007Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Advanticsys: As-xm1000 sensor node. http://www.advanticsys.com/shop/asxm1000-p-24.html
  14. 14.
    Istomin, T., Marfievici, R., Murphy, A.L., Picco, G.P.: Trident: In-field connectivity assessment for wireless sensor networks. In: In Proceedings of the 6th Extreme Conference on Communication and Computing (ExtremeCom) (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    TinyOS Working Group: TinyOS open-source operating system designed for low-power wireless devices. http://www.tinyos.net/

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan Reis
    • 1
  • Dirk Pesch
    • 1
  • Bernd-Ludwig Wenning
    • 1
  • Michael Kuhn
    • 2
  1. 1.Nimbus Research CentreCork Institute of TechnologyCorkIreland
  2. 2.University of Applied Sciences DarmstadtDarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations