Skip to main content

Evaluation of a Training Programme to Improve the Professional Error Competence of Prospective Teachers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Professional Error Competence of Preservice Teachers

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Education ((BRIEFSEDUCAT))

  • 388 Accesses

Abstract

Teachers need professional error competence (PEC) to support students’ learning from errors. However, recent findings show that teacher students and teachers at the beginning of their career show a rather low level of PEC, while it is significantly higher for experienced teachers. Therefore it is assumed that PEC can be developed in learning processes and a training programme was developed to foster it. Against this background, we evaluate the training programme’s efficacy using measures that cover different aspects of typical evaluation indicators as well as important parts of (prospective) teachers’ PEC. While first trainings did not support the competence development of the participants, results show that training is successful if there is sufficient training time and content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge are offered in an integrated way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    In accordance with Kirkpatrick (1998) the second evaluation level will be labelled as “learning level” in the following since the paper focuses on changes in participants’ knowledge but not on changes in their beliefs or subjective theories.

References

  • Ball, D., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional development. In L. Darling-Hamond & G. Skyes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., et al. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 133–180. doi:10.3102/0002831209345157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouley, F., Wuttke, E., Schnick-Vollmer, K., Schmitz, B., Berger, S., Fritsch, S., et al. (2015). Professional competence of prospective teachers in business and economics education—Evaluation of a competence model using structural equation modelling. Peabody Journal of Education, 90(4), 491–502. doi:10.1080/0161956X.2015.1068076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desimone, L. M. (2009): Improving Impact Studies of Teachers’ Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. doi:10.3102/0013189X08331140.

  • Fritsch, S., Berger, S., Seifried, J., Bouley, F., Wuttke, E., Schnick-Vollmer, K., et al. (2015). The impact of university teacher training on prospective teachers’ CK and PCK—A comparison between Austria and Germany. In O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia & R. Shavelson (Eds.), Special issue on assessment of domain-specific professional competencies, empirical research in vocational education and training (ERVET) (Vol. 7, No. 4). doi:10.1186/s40461-015-0014-8.

  • Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945. doi:10.3102/00028312038004915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grohmann, A., & Kauffeld, S. (2013). Evaluating training programs: Development and correlates of the questionnaire for professional training evaluation. International Journal of Training and Development, 17(2), 135–155. doi:10.1111/ijtd.12005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmke, A. (2010). Unterrichtsqualität und Lehrerprofessionalität: Diagnose, Evaluation und Verbesserung des Unterrichts [Quality of instruction and teacher professionalization. Diagnosis, Evaluation and improvement of instruction] (3rd ed.). Seelze-Velber: Klett-Kallmeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingvarson, L., Meiers, M., & Beavis, A. (2005). Factors affecting the impact of professional development programs on teachers’ knowledge, practice, student outcomes and efficacy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(10), 1–26. doi:10.14507/epaa.v13n10.2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M. (1998). Form and substance in inservice teacher education: Research monograph. Wisconsin: National Institute for Science Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, D. (1998). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Bennet-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipowsky, F. (2009). Unterrichtsentwicklung durch Fort- und Weiterbildungsmaßnahmen für Lehrpersonen [Improving teaching quality through continuing and further education]. Beiträge zur Lehrerbildung, 27(3), 346–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipowsky, F. (2010). Lernen im Beruf. Empirische Befunde zur Wirksamkeit von Lehrerfortbildung [Professional learning. Empirical findings regarding the effects of teacher professional development]. In F. H. Müller, A. Eichenberger, M. Lüders, & J. Mayr (Eds.), Lehrerinnen und Lehrer lernen. Konzepte und Befunde zur Lehrerfortbildung [Teachers learn. Concepts and findings of teacher trainings] (pp. 51–70). Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. P. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 921–958. doi:10.3102/0002831207308221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration (BES). Wellington: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Türling, J. M. (2014). Die professionelle Fehlerkompetenz von (angehenden) Lehrkräften: Eine empirische Untersuchung im Rechnungswesenunterricht [The professional error competence of (prospective) teachers—An empirical study in the field of accounting lessons]. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. doi:10.1007/978-3-658-04931-7.

  • Türling, J. M., Seifried, J., & Wuttke, E. (2012). Teachers’ knowledge about domain specific student errors. In E. Wuttke & J. Seifried (Eds.), Learning from errors at school and at work (pp. 95–110). Opladen: Barbara Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Keer, H., & Verhaeghe, J. P. (2005). Comparing two teacher development programs for innovating reading comprehension instruction with regard to teachers’ experiences and student outcomes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 543–562. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Veen, K., Zwart, R., & Meirink, J. (2012). What makes teacher professional development effective? A literature review. In M. Kooy & K. van Veen (Eds.), Teacher learning that matters: International perspectives (pp. 3–21). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuttke, E., & Seifried, J. (2017). Using video-vignettes for the assessment of competences: A case study in the field of accounting education. Sage Research Methods Case Education. doi:10.4135/9781473999060.

  • Yoon, K. S., Duncan, T., Lee, S. W.-Y., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement. Issues & Answers Report, 33, 1–62.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia Krille .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

  1. (1)

    Example item 1 of knowledge test (Fig. 5.19).

Fig. 5.19
figure 19

Example item for CK

  1. (2)

    Example item 2 of knowledge test (Fig. 5.20).

    Fig. 5.20
    figure 20

    Example item for PCK

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Krille, C., Salge, B., Wuttke, E., Seifried, J. (2017). Evaluation of a Training Programme to Improve the Professional Error Competence of Prospective Teachers. In: Wuttke, E., Seifried, J. (eds) Professional Error Competence of Preservice Teachers. SpringerBriefs in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52649-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52649-2_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52647-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52649-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics