Abstract
This chapter critically discusses the research methods used in this book. The empirical research took on a qualitative approach. Because male rape is a sensitive issue, it is important and essential to give some consideration to the literature on researching sensitive topics, and the difficulties for the writer researching such a sensitive topic, such as the stigma it creates for the writer in a professional and personal capacity. This will be supplemented with a discussion of the importance of reflexivity; the author talks about his own experience of rape and places this in an academic context, using sociological and criminological literature on reflexivity.
Keywords
- Reflexivity
- Positionality
- Stigma
- Ethics
- Methods
- Methodology
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Qualitative researchers rarely do a 9 a.m.–5 p.m. working day and often our work is taken home.
References
Abdullah-Khan, N. (2008). Male Rape: The Emergence of a Social and Legal Issue. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Allport, G. W. (1963). Forward. In N. L. Farberow (Ed.), Taboo Topics. New York: Atherton Press.
Attwood, F. (2010). Dirty Work: Researching Women and Sexual Representation. In R. Ryan-Flood & R. Gill (Eds.), Secrecy and Silence in the Research Process (pp. 177–187). London: Routledge.
Bloor, M., Fincham, B., & Sampson, H. (2010). Unprepared for the Worst: Risks of Harm for Qualitative Researchers. Methodological Innovations Online, 5(1), 45–55.
Bondi, L. (2003). Empathy and Identification: Conceptual Resources for Feminist Fieldwork. ACME: An International e-Journal for Critical Geographies, 2(1), 64–76.
Braun, V. (1999). Breaking a Taboo? Talking (and Laughing) About the Vagina. Feminism and Psychology, 9(3), 367–372.
Bullock, C. M., & Beckson, M. (2011). Male Victims of Sexual Assault: Phenomenology, Psychology, Physiology. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 39, 197–205.
Clark, J. N. (2014). A Crime of Identity: Rape and Its Neglected Victims. Journal of Human Rights, 13(2), 146–169.
Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (2000). Autoethnography, Personal Narrative, Reflexivity: Researcher as Subject. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed., pp. 733–768). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethonography: An Overview. Qualitative Social Research, 12(1).
Foucault, M. (1976). Truth and Power. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Essential Works of Foucault (Vol. 3, pp. 111–133). New York: The Free Press.
Gadamer, H. G. (1995). Truth and Method. New York: Continuum.
Gerrish, K., & Lacey, A. (2006). The Research Process in Nursing (5th ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in Practice (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
hooks, B. (1999). Remembered Rapture: The Writer at Work. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
hooks, B. (2004). The Will to Change: Men, Masculinity, and Love. New York: Washington Square Press.
Huff, J. (1997). The Sexual Harassment of Researchers by Research Subjects: Lessons from the Field. In M. Schwartz (Ed.), Researching Sexual Violence Against Women: Methodological and Personal Perspectives (pp. 115–128). London: Sage.
Irvine, J. M. (2012). “Can’t Ask, Can’t Tell”: How Institutional Review Boards Keep Sex in the Closet. Contexts, 11(2), 28–33.
Israel, T. (2002). Studying Sexuality: Strategies for Surviving Stigma. Feminism and Psychology, 12(2), 256–260.
Jaspal, R. (2017). Coping with Perceived Ethnic Prejudice on the Gay Scene. Journal of LGBT Youth, 14(2), 172–190.
Javaid, A. (2018a). Out of Place: Sexualities, Sexual Violence, and Heteronormativity. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 39, 83–89.
Javaid, A. (2018b). Masculinities, Sexualities and Love. London: Routledge.
Lee, R. M. (1993). Doing Research on Sensitive Topics. London: Sage.
Lee-Treweek, G., & Linkogle, S. (Eds.). (2000). Danger in the Field: Risk and Ethics in Social Research. London: Routledge.
Lumsden, K., & Winter, A. (2014). Reflexivity in Criminological Research. In K. Lumsden & A. Winter (Eds.), Reflexivity in Criminological Research: Experiences with the Powerful and the Powerless. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative Researching. London: Sage.
McIlveen, P. (2008). Autoethnography as a Method for Reflexive Research and Practice in Vocational Psychology. Australian Journal of Career Development, 17(2), 13–20.
Messerschmidt, J. (2017). ‘Masculinities and Femicide’. Qualitative Sociology Review, XIII(3), 71–79.
Moreno, E. (1995). Rape in the Field: Reflections From a Survivor. In D. Kulick & M. Wilson (Eds.), Taboo: Sex, Identity, and Erotic Subjectivity in Anthropological Fieldwork (pp. 166–189). London: Routledge.
Morrow, S. L. (2006). Honor and Respect: Feminist Collaborative Research with Sexually Abused Women. In C. T. Fischer (Ed.), Qualitative Research Methods for Psychologists: Introduction Through Empirical Studies (1st ed., pp. 143–172). London: Elsevier.
Morse, J. M., & Field, P. A. (1995). Qualitative Research Methods for Health Professionals. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Motsemme, N. (2004). The Mute Always Speak: On Women’s Silences at the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Current Sociology, 52(5), 909–932.
Narayan, K. (1993). How Native Is a ‘Native’ Anthropologist? American Anthropologist, 95(3), 671–686.
Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing Women: A Contradiction in Terms. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing Feminist Research. New York: Routledge.
Parker, I. (1999). Critical Reflexive Humanism and Critical Constructionist Psychology. In D. Nightingale & J. Cromby (Eds.), Social Constructionist Psychology a Critical Analysis of Theory and Practice (1st ed., pp. 23–36). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Pattillo-McCoy, M., & Buford, R. (2000). Do You See What I See? Examining a Collaborative Ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 6(1), 65–87.
Pomeroy, W. B. (1963). Human Sexual Behaviour. In N. L. Farberow (Ed.), Taboo Topics. New York: Atherton.
Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist Methods in Social Research. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rumney, P. (2008). Policing Male Rape and Sexual Assault. Journal of Criminal Law, 72(1), 67–86.
Rumney, P. (2009). Gay Male Rape Victims: Law Enforcement, Social Attitudes and Barriers to Recognition. The International Journal of Human Rights, 13(2), 233–250.
Scarce, M. (1997). Male on Male Rape: The Hidden Toll of Stigma and Shame. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing.
Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1983). Breaking Out: Feminist Consciousness and Feminist Research. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1993). Breaking Out Again: Feminist Ontology and Epistemology. London: Routledge.
Sultana, F. (2007). Reflexivity, Positionality and Participatory Ethics: Negotiating Fieldwork Dilemmas in International Research. An International e-Journal for Critical Geographies, 6(3), 374–385.
Walby, K. (2010). Interviews as Encounters: Issues of Sexuality and Reflexivity When Men Interview Men About Commercial Same Sex Relations. Qualitative Research, 10(6), 639–657.
Weiss, K. G. (2010). Male Sexual Victimization: Examining Men’s Experiences of Rape and Sexual Assault. Men and Masculinities, 12(3), 275–298.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Javaid, A. (2018). Researching Male Sexual Victimisation: ‘The Personal Is Political’. In: Male Rape, Masculinities, and Sexualities. Palgrave Hate Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52639-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52639-3_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52638-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52639-3
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)