Advertisement

Secular and Religious Reason and Islam as a ‘Discursive Tradition’

  • Hadi Enayat
Chapter
  • 286 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter begins by discussing the secular Enlightenment notion of ‘critique’ with reference to Asad’s comparison of the Islamic principle of nasiha (private advice to rulers) with Kant’s understanding of critique. Is the former a viable form of ‘traditional criticality’? The chapter then focuses on Asad’s suggestive but ambiguous notion of Islam as a ‘discursive tradition’. Here Asad was attempting to navigate between essentialist conceptions of Islam (there is only one authentic Islam) and relativist conceptions (there are multiple and equally valid local islams) to argue for the centrality of ‘orthodoxy’ in Islam and for the primacy of power in defining that orthodoxy. The problems with this understanding of Islam and its implications for defining ‘insiders’ and ‘outsiders’ are set out with reference to the analysis of Nasr Abu-Zayd case by Charles Hirschkind and Saba Mahmood.

Keywords

Reason Tradition Orthodoxy Heremeneutics Islam 

References

  1. Abu Zayd, N. (1992) Naqd al-Khitab al-Dini, Cairo: Dar al-Thaqafah al-Jadidah.Google Scholar
  2. Abu Zayd, N., & Nelson, E. R. (2004) Voice of an Exile: Reflections on Islam, Westport Con: Praeger.Google Scholar
  3. Ahmed, R. (2012) Narratives of Islamic Legal Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahmed, S. (2016) What is Islam? The Importance of Being Islamic, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Akhavi, S. (2009) The Middle East: The Politics of the Sacred and Secular, London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  6. Akyol, M. (2011) Islam without Extremes: A Muslim Case for Liberty, New York: WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  7. Al-Rasheed, M. (2015) Muted Modernists: The Struggle for Divine Politics in Saudi Arabia, London: Hurst Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Amirpur, K. (2015) New Thinking in Islam: The Jihad for Freedom, Democracy and Women’s Rights, London: Gingko Library.Google Scholar
  9. Anjum, O. (2007) ‘Islam as a Discursive Tradition: Talal Asad and his Interlocutors’, Comparative Studies of South Asia and the Middle East, 27(3), pp. 656–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. An-Na‘im, A. (2008) Islam and the Secular State: Negotiating the Future of Shariʿa, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Asad, T. (1986) ‘The Idea of an Anthropology of Islam’, Que Parle, 17(2), pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
  12. Asad, T. (1993) Genealogies of Religion: Disciplines of Power, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Asad, T. (2003) Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bangstad, S. (2009) ‘Contesting Secularism/s: Secularism and Islam in the Work of Talal Asad’, Anthropological Theory, 9(2), pp. 188–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown, J. A. C. (2014) Misquoting Muhammad: The Challenge and Choices of Interpreting the Prophet’s Legacy, Oxford: One World.Google Scholar
  16. Brown, W. (2009) ‘Introduction,’ in Asad, T., Brown, W., Butler, J., & Mahmood, S. Is Critique Secular? Blasphemy, Injury, and Free Speech, Berkley: University of California Press, pp. 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Calvert, J. (2010) Sayyid Qutb and the Origins of Radical Islamism, London: Hurst Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. El–Zein, A. (1977) ‘Beyond Ideology and Theology: The Search for the Anthropology of Islam’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 6, pp. 227–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gellner, E. (1981) Muslim Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Halverson, J. (2010) Theology and Creed in Sunni Islam: The Muslim Brotherhood, Ash’arism, and Political Sunnism, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hirschkind, C. (1995) ‘Heresy or Hermeneutics: The Case of Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd’, Stanford Humanities Review, 5(1), pp. 35–49.Google Scholar
  22. Jansen, Y. (2011) ‘Postsecularism, Piety and Fanaticism: Reflections on Jürgen Habermas’and Saba Mahmood’s Critiques of Secularism’, Philosophy & Social Criticism, 37(9), pp. 977–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kassab, Elizabeth, S. (2010) Contemporary Arab Thought: Cultural Critique in Comparative Perspective, New York: Colombia University Press.Google Scholar
  24. MacIntyre, A. (1988) Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Dame, Notre Dame Ind: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  25. Mahmood, S. (2005) Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Mir-Hosseini, Z. (2015) ‘Muslim Legal Tradition and the Challenge of Gender Equality’ in Mir-Hosseini, Z., Al-Sharmani, Z. & Rumminger, J. (eds.) Men in Charge: Rethinking Authority in Muslim Legal Tradition, Oxford: One World, pp. 13–44.Google Scholar
  27. Shahin, ‘Abd al-Sabur (1994) Qissah Abu Zayd wa Inhisar al-‘Almaniyah fi Jamiat Qahirah, Cairo: Dar al I‘tisam.Google Scholar
  28. Silverstein, B. (2011) Islam and Modernity in Turkey, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zaman, M. Q. (2012) Modern Islamic Thought in a Radical Age, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hadi Enayat
    • 1
  1. 1.Aga Khan UniversityLondonUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations