Multicultural and Multifaceted Canada



Describing the system of education in Canada is akin to trying to describe the nation itself—complex. It is perhaps difficult to pinpoint defining features, the country being viewed by many on the world stage as strong and stable; yet on home soil, many Canadians struggle to articulate where the essence of their country lies. [I am one of those Canadians. That being said, I feel very fortunate to live, work and raise my children in Canada. I look out my window and see the Rocky Mountains; I breathe clean air and have clean water to drink any time I turn my faucets on; my children walk to school in what I feel is as safe a neighbourhood as you will find in a large Canadian city; and, I am fortunate to have a good paying job doing something I love that also provides for my family.] But—and perhaps the one “thing” many Canadians struggle with most is that when questioned they would be hard pressed to explain what “the Canadian experience” is. In large part this is due to the fact that being Canadian is far from a singular experience shared by all. Canada is such a diverse country, welcoming with opens arms people from all nations as though they were our own. Canadians come in all shapes and sizes, colours and voices, and for the most part, the people tend to make “it” work. Describing the Canadian education system is in many ways the same—education in Canada is not a singular entity. It is complex and diverse, dynamic—yet in some cases so very slow to change, to reflect the world our students are growing up in.


  1. Alberta Education. (2016). CTF program of studies. Edmonton: Alberta Education Publications.Google Scholar
  2. British Columbia Teachers’ Federation. (2014). News release: BC teachers ratify agreement, end strike. Retrieved from
  3. Council of Ministers of Education, Canada. (2013). Measuring up: Canadian results of the OECD PISA study. Toronto: Council of Ministers of Education, Canada.Google Scholar
  4. Dunleavy, J., Willms, J. D., Milton, P., & Friesen, S. (2012). The relationship between student engagement and academic outcomes. What did you do in school today? Research Series Report Number One. Toronto: Canadian Education Association.Google Scholar
  5. Friesen, S. (2009). What did you do in school today? Teaching effectiveness: A framework and rubric. Toronto: Canadian Education Association.Google Scholar
  6. Gogek, D. (2014). Plussing – How Pixar transforms critiquing into creating. Retrieved from
  7. Hanvey, L. (2006). Issues affecting the well-being of Canadian children in the middle years – 6 to 12: A discussion paper. Ottawa: National Alliance for Children and Youth.Google Scholar
  8. IDEO. (2012). Design thinking for educators. Retrieved from
  9. Kohn, A. (2015, September). What does it mean to be well-educated. Retrieved from
  10. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014). Canada: Education at a glance, country note. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Robinson, K. (2006, June). Do schools kill creativity. TED.Google Scholar
  12. Sawyer, R. K. (2008). Group genius: The creative power of collaboration. Philadelphia: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
  13. Sawyer, R. K. (2014). How to transform schools to foster creativity. Teachers College Record, 118(4), 1–23.Google Scholar
  14. Steinberg, L. (2014). Age of opportunity: Lessons from the new science of adolescence. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin, Harcourt.Google Scholar
  15. Yee, B. (2015). Leading, teaching and learning “in the Middle”–An international case study narrative examining the leadership dimensions, instructional practices and contextual philosophies that have transformed teaching and learning in the middle years. Retrieved from

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Calgary Board of Education, University of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  2. 2.Universität HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
  3. 3.University of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland

Personalised recommendations