Skip to main content

ADDENDUM: “Journey to Critical Inquiry”: Students’ Analyses of Scenarios Designed to Promote Collaborative Decision Making

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Plato and Intellectual Development
  • 247 Accesses

Abstract

This last part of the book is focused on a project for students from 8 through 12 years of age. The project is based upon learning units: in the units brief excerpts taken from Plato’s philosophy are clarified through examples taken from the everyday life of the children, and questions are devised to make the students reflect on their own process of decision making, on the decisions made and on the nature of their reasons. The project creates the opportunity for students who attend schools in under-resourced and more privileged communities to reflect on the variety of perspectives necessary to solve problems successfully: they will work on the issues raised in the units relying on an extended community which interacts online.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    On this project see also Saracco, Susanna 2016. “Learning from Childhood: Children Tell Us Who They Are Through Online Dialogical Interaction.” International Journal for Transformative Research 3 (1): 3–8 and Saracco, Susanna 2016. “Difference as a Resource for Thinking: An Online Dialogue Showing the Role Played by Difference in Problem Solving and Decision Making.” Metaphilosophy 47 (3): 467–476.

  2. 2.

    The technological ensemble necessary to implement the project, and its transferability, have been discussed by Saracco, and Feenberg, Glass, Xin, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver. A detailed description of the technology utilized in the project is available from the author.

References

Recent Works

  • Anyon. 1980. “Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work.” Journal of Education 162 (1): 67–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P. and Lauder, H. 2000. “Education, Child Poverty and the Politics of Collective Intelligence.” In Sociology of Education: Major Themes, Vol. IV, edited by Ball, Stephen. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damon, W. 1991. “Problems of Direction in Socially Shared Cognition.” In Perspectives of Socially Shared Cognition, edited by Resnick, L., Levine, S., and Teasley, L. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. 1970. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gureckis, T. M. and Goldstone, R. L. 2006. “Thinking in Groups.” Pragmatics and Cognition 14 (2): 293–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. 1991. “The Social Organization of Distributed Cognition.” In Perspectives of Socially Shared Cognition, edited by Resnick, L., Levine, S., and Teasley, L. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. 1981. The Philosophy of Moral Development: Moral Stages and the Idea of Justice. New York: Harper & Row Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, G. B. 2000. “The Ring of Gyges.” International Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (1): 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N. and Littleton, K. 2007. Dialogue and the Development of Children’s Thinking. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pea, R. D. 1993. “Practises of Distributed Intelligence and Designs for Education.” In Distributed Cognition, edited by Salomon, G. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, S. C., Finegood, E. D., and Swain, J. E. 2013. “Poverty and Language Development: Roles of Parenting and Stress.” Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience 10 (4): 10–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perret-Clermont, A. N., Perret, J.-F., and Bell, N. 1991. “The Social Construction of Meaning and Cognitive Activity in Elementary School Children.” In Perspectives of Socially Shared Cognition, edited by Resnick, L., Levine, S., and Teasley, L. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. 1948. The Moral Judgement of the Child. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. 1964. The Early Growth of Logic in the Child: Classification and Seriation. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. 1991. “Social Interaction as Apprenticeship in Thinking: Guided Participation in Spatial Planning.” In Perspectives of Socially Shared Cognition, edited by Resnick, L., Levine, S., and Teasley, L. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saracco, Susanna. 2016. “Difference as a Resource for Thinking: An Online Dialogue Showing the Role Played by Difference in Problem Solving and Decision Making.” Metaphilosophy 47 (3): 467–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saracco, Susanna. 2016. “Learning from Childhood: Children Tell Us Who They Are Through Online Dialogical Interaction.” International Journal for Transformative Research 3 (1): 3–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. 1986. Thought and Language. Translation revised by Kozulin, Alex. Cambridge, M.A.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Saracco, S. (2017). ADDENDUM: “Journey to Critical Inquiry”: Students’ Analyses of Scenarios Designed to Promote Collaborative Decision Making. In: Plato and Intellectual Development. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52587-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics