Skip to main content

Cogs in the Machine: Testimonies of Holocaust Perpetrators

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Perpetrators in Holocaust Narratives
  • 506 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, the author examines testimonial accounts of Nazi perpetrators. Outlining the ethical claims made by the authors of these memoirs, Pettitt shows how these figures attempt to locate their own culpability within a wider schema of social and political events. Taking the testimony of Rudolf Höss as an exemplary account, the author uses the existential theories of Jean-Paul Sartre and Erving Goffman to articulate the ethical dilemmas that these perpetrators raise. In the end, the author shows that many such testimonies function by depicting a ‘cog-in-the-machine’ mentality; this allows for larger notions of self-sacrifice, determination and human responsibility to be explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Kaltenbrunner was the chief of the Reichsicherheitshauptamt (RSHA) and SS-Obergruppenführer und General der Polizei und Waffen-SS. Göring was Reichsmarschall of the Third Reich, a position ranked second only to Hitler himself. He was also the founder of the Gestapo.

  2. 2.

    There are comparisons to be drawn here between this dual-existence and the psychical doubling that is expounded by Robert J. Lifton. As has been discussed elsewhere, Lifton argues that the role of Nazi doctors at Auschwitz necessitated a psychical split in order that the individual may maintain his or her perception of self as fundamentally ‘decent’ (see Lifton, 2000/1986). A similar mechanism is seen in Höss’s case but here the divide is a conscious one, applied retrospectively, implying a move away from the psychological theories enhanced by Lifton. Nevertheless, since the notion of the divided self is essential to the construction of the ‘ethical self’, it might be said that the rupture fulfils a similar function in both cases.

Bibliography

  • [Court Transcripts]. 1945. Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal. http://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/NT_major-war-criminals.html (last accessed 11/8/15).

  • Arendt, Hannah. 1963. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Zygmunt. 1989. Modernity and the Holocaust. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Jonathan. 1994. ‘The Conscience of Huckleberry Finn’. In Ethics. Ed. Peter Singer. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 294–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergen, Doris L. 1994. ‘The Nazi Concept of “Volksdeutsche” and the Exacerbation of Anti-Semitism in Eastern Europe, 1939–45’. Journal of Contemporary History 29.4: 569–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browning, Christopher. 1992. Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland. New York: Aaron Asher Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dönitz, Karl. 2012 (1958). Memoirs: Ten Years and Twenty Days. Barnsley: Frontline Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving. 1972 (1967). ‘On Face-Work’. In Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behaviour. Ed. Erving Goffman. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 5–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldensohn, Leon. 2004. The Nuremberg Interviews: An American Psychiatrist’s Conversations with the Defendants and Witnesses. Ed. Robert Gellately. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldhagen, Daniel Jonah. 1996. Hitler’s Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust. London: Abacus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höss, Rudolf. 2000 (1959). Commandant of Auschwitz. London: Orion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesselring, Albert. 1953. The Memoirs of Field-Marshal Kesselring. London: William Kimber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifton, Robert J. 2000 (1986). The Nazi Doctors: Medical Killing and the Psychology of Genocide. London: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKale, Donald M. 2012. Nazis After Hitler: How Perpetrators of the Holocaust Cheated Justice and Truth. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest, Stephen, ed. 2001. Jean-Paul Sartre: Basic Writings. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, Jean-Paul. 2003 (1943). Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schellenberg, Walter. 2006 (1956). The Memoirs of Hitler’s Spymaster. London: André Deutsch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twiss, Sumner B. 2010. ‘Can a Perpetrator Write a Testimonio? Moral Lessons from the Dark Side’. Journal of Religious Ethics 38.1: 5–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Schirach, Baldur. 1968. J’ai Cru en Hitler. Trans. Richard Denturck. Paris: Librairie Plon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Colin. 1998. The Books in My Life. Charlottesville: Hampton Roads.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofland, John. 1980. ‘Early Goffman: Style, Structure, Substance, Soul.’ In The View from Goffman. Ed. Jason Ditton. New York: St. Martin’s Press: 24–51.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pettitt, J. (2017). Cogs in the Machine: Testimonies of Holocaust Perpetrators. In: Perpetrators in Holocaust Narratives. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52575-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics