Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics ((SAPERE,volume 36))

  • 633 Accesses

Abstract

In terms of social contracts, designs may be assessed according to how well they respect people’s rights and how well they promote social justice. One limitation of this approach is that it omits the importance of prediction in design assessment. That is, designs are configured according to assumptions about what the future will be like. As noted in our discussion of rational design, predictions about the future can be inaccurate. Yet, our discussion of designs and social contracts has taken no account of this fact. Fortunately, there are ways of assessing designs in light of uncertainty about how the future will turn out. In this chapter, the concept of risk is introduced. Risk assessment refers to the analysis of uncertain future impacts of decisions and is readily applied to design assessment. The expected-value model of risk is described and applied to several cases of design assessment. On this model, designs may be assessed by scrutinizing the distributions of risk that they may give rise to. In particular, the principles of collectivism, equity, and individualism in the distribution of risk are examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    These terms are adapted from Hansson (2013).

  2. 2.

    Norman (1990).

  3. 3.

    Whitten (2016).

  4. 4.

    Norman (2015).

  5. 5.

    Cf. The Economist (2013).

  6. 6.

    Cf. Aven (2012).

  7. 7.

    Bryson (2010), p. 309.

  8. 8.

    Kusch (2014).

  9. 9.

    Huang et al. (2006).

  10. 10.

    Tenner (1997), pp. 168ff.

  11. 11.

    Keizer (2010), p. 61.

  12. 12.

    Hansson (2013), p. 1097.

  13. 13.

    Bryant (2015).

  14. 14.

    Ryan (2012).

  15. 15.

    Hsu (2014).

  16. 16.

    Peck (2011).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cameron Shelley .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shelley, C. (2017). Risk. In: Design and Society: Social Issues in Technological Design. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 36. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52515-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52515-0_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52514-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52515-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics