Abstract
In terms of social contracts, designs may be assessed according to how well they respect people’s rights and how well they promote social justice. One limitation of this approach is that it omits the importance of prediction in design assessment. That is, designs are configured according to assumptions about what the future will be like. As noted in our discussion of rational design, predictions about the future can be inaccurate. Yet, our discussion of designs and social contracts has taken no account of this fact. Fortunately, there are ways of assessing designs in light of uncertainty about how the future will turn out. In this chapter, the concept of risk is introduced. Risk assessment refers to the analysis of uncertain future impacts of decisions and is readily applied to design assessment. The expected-value model of risk is described and applied to several cases of design assessment. On this model, designs may be assessed by scrutinizing the distributions of risk that they may give rise to. In particular, the principles of collectivism, equity, and individualism in the distribution of risk are examined.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
These terms are adapted from Hansson (2013).
- 2.
Norman (1990).
- 3.
Whitten (2016).
- 4.
Norman (2015).
- 5.
Cf. The Economist (2013).
- 6.
Cf. Aven (2012).
- 7.
Bryson (2010), p. 309.
- 8.
Kusch (2014).
- 9.
Huang et al. (2006).
- 10.
Tenner (1997), pp. 168ff.
- 11.
Keizer (2010), p. 61.
- 12.
Hansson (2013), p. 1097.
- 13.
Bryant (2015).
- 14.
Ryan (2012).
- 15.
Hsu (2014).
- 16.
Peck (2011).
References
Aven, T. (2012). The risk concept—Historical and recent development trends. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 99, 33–44.
Bryant, R. (2015, January 20). Jaguar’s cars could “tap drivers on the shoulder” to prevent cyclist deaths. Retrieved January 21, 2015, from Dezeen Magazine: http://www.dezeen.com/2015/01/20/jaguar-bike-sense-alert-tap-drivers-prevent-cycling-accidents/
Bryson, B. (2010). At home: A short history of private life. New York: Doubleday.
Hansson, S. O. (2013). The ethics of risk: Ethical analysis in an uncertain world. London: Palgrave.
Hsu, J. (2014, October 27). Feds probe cybersecurity dangers in medical devices. Retrieved June 20, 2016, from IEEE Spectrum: http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/biomedical/devices/feds-probe-cybersecurity-dangers-in-medical-devices
Huang, H., Chin, H., & Heng, A. (2006). Effect of red light cameras on accident risk at intersections. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1969, 18–26.
Keizer, G. (2010). The unwanted sound of everything we want: A book about noise. Philadelphia: PublicAffairs Books.
Kusch, L. (2014, September 19). Diagnosing our health care. Retrieved October 20, 2015, from Winnipeg Free Press: http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/diagnosing-our-health-care-275704401.html
Norman, D. (1990). The “problem” of automation: Inappropriate feedback and interaction, not “over-automation”. In D. E. Broadbent, A. Baddeley, & J. T. Reason (Eds.), Human factors in hazardous situations (pp. 585–593). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Norman, D. (2015, June 4). Automatic cars or distracted drivers: We need automation sooner, not later. Retrieved June 6, 2015, from Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/automatic-cars-distracted-drivers-we-need-automation-sooner-norman
Peck, M. E. (2011, August 12). Medical devices are vulnerable to hacks, but risk is low overall. Retrieved June 20, 2016, from IEEE Spectrum: http://spectrum.ieee.org/biomedical/devices/medical-devices-are-vulnerable-to-hacks-but-risk-is-low-overall
Ryan, M. (2012, December 2). ‘Homeland’: Brody helps Nazir kill someone; Producers talk shocking exit and what’s next. Retrieved June 20, 2016, from The Huffington Post: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/02/homeland-brody-kills_n_2213510.html
Tenner, E. (1997). Why things bite back: Technology and the revenge of unintended consequences. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
The Economist. (2013, November 30). Fatal distraction. Retrieved December 3, 2013, from The Economist: http://www.economist.com/news/technology-quarterly/21590762-mobile-phones-people-who-use-their-phones-while-driving-are-causing-carnage
Whitten, S. (2016, May 25). Man reportedly caught sleeping behind the wheel of a self-driving Tesla. Retrieved May 27, 2016, from CNBC: http://www.cnbc.com/2016/05/25/man-reportedly-caught-sleeping-behind-the-wheel-of-a-self-driving-tesla.html
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shelley, C. (2017). Risk. In: Design and Society: Social Issues in Technological Design. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 36. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52515-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52515-0_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52514-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52515-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)