Skip to main content

Changes in the Political, Social and Economic Environment of Public Policy in South Korea After the 1980s

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Korean Government and Public Policies in a Development Nexus

Part of the book series: The Political Economy of the Asia Pacific ((PEAP))

Abstract

Public policy decisions can be better understood by considering the political, social, and economic changes in the policy environment. The purpose of this chapter is to provide an overview of policy environment changes in South Korea after the 1980s, focusing particularly on the consequences of two historical events: the 6/29 declaration in 1987 and the financial crisis in 1997. Taking a historical perspective to analyze the institutional setting of the Korean state, we first review the two events, then analyze the political, social, and economic changes in the policy environment, and finally discuss challenges caused by the changes for the president, legislature, and state bureaucracy. We argue that the democratic and neo-liberal changes in the policy environment have affected the relationship among the policy actors and their policy capacities. We conclude with a discussion on the future of the Korean developmental state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The English quotes from the 6/29 declaration in this chapter are based on Bedeski’s work (1994).

  2. 2.

    “… it is necessary also to revise the Presidential Election Law so that freedom of candidacy and fair competition are guaranteed … A revised election law should ensure maximum fairness and justness in election management, from the campaigns to the casting, opening and counting of ballots.”

  3. 3.

    http://news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?mode=LSD&mid=sec&sid1=117&oid=078&aid=0000037944.2007.11.9

  4. 4.

    http://www.polinews.co.kr/news/article.html?no=11330.2001.3.1.

  5. 5.

    It should be noted that the financial crisis not only drove economic globalization but also social globalization. As Rosendorf (2000) claimed that globalization is ultimately a social and cultural phenomenon, globalization was a process of global standardization and isomorphism.

  6. 6.

    http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=TEMP_I.

  7. 7.

    The origin of the term imperial presidency is not clear (Choi 2002). At the least, we need to distinguish its meaning when the term is used in the United States and South Korea. In the former, it usually refers to the president’s exclusive power with regard to foreign policy. In the latter, it usually refers to the president’s unconstrained power in both domestic and foreign affairs (Choi 2002), mainly emphasizing the president’s control over the legislature and the court.

  8. 8.

    Until the 2000s, the presidents were also the chief of the ruling party.

  9. 9.

    Revisions and delay of bills occurred frequently, as shown in the Labor Reform Act by the Kim Young-sam administration in 1996 and procrastinated reforms during the Kim Dae-jung administration due to chaebol resistance.

  10. 10.

    Even the United States has been warned against increasingly polarization (Pew Research Center 2014).

References

  • Alavi H (1979) The state in post-colonial societies: Pakistan and Bangladesh. In: Goubourne H (ed) Politics and state in the third world. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen M (2004) The varieties of capitalism paradigm: not enough variety? Socio-Econ Rev 2:87–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedeski RE (1994) The transformation of South Korea: reform and reconstruction in the sixth republic under Roh Tae-woo, 1987–1992. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Choi J (2002) Democracy after democratization: the Korean experience. Humanitas, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans P (1995) Embedded autonomy: states and industrial transformation. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall P, Soskice D (eds) (2001) Varieties of capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Heo U, Roehrig T (2010) South Korea since 1980. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington SP (1993) The third wave: democratization in the late twentieth century, vol 4. University of Oklahoma Press, Okalahoma

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji J (2011) The origin and formation of neoliberalization of South Korea. Bookworld, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson C (1982) MITI and the Japanese miracle: the growth of industrial policy: 1925–1975. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung Y (2014) The Korean State, public administration, and development: past, present, and future challenges. Seoul National University Press, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang W, Kim B, Ahn S, Yee J, Choi I (2014) Are you in the middle class: anatomy of social class conflicts. 21st Century Books, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim S (2014) Korean democratization and the asian financial crisis: toward normalizing representative democracy. In: Lee TJ et al (eds) Transformation of Korean society after the foreign currency crisis: changes in politics, economy, and welfare. Hanul Books, Seoul, pp 66–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim H, Jang J (2006) Neo-Liberalism in post-crisis South Korea: social conditions and outcomes. J Contemp Asia 36(4):442–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center (2014) Political polarization in the American public

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson PJ, Choi T (2010) Ecological governance: organizing principles for an emerging era. Publ Adm Rev 70(1):89–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosendorf NM (2000) Social and cultural globalization: concepts, history, and America’s role. In: Nye JS, Donahue JD (eds) Governance in a globalizing world. Brookings Institute, Washington, D.C., pp 109–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1943) Capitalism in the postwar world

    Google Scholar 

  • Soskice D (1999) Divergent production regimes: coordinated and uncoordinated market economies in the 1980s and 1990s. In: Kitschelt H, Lange P, Marks G, Stephens JD (eds) Continuity and change in contemporary capitalism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 101–134

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss L (1998) The myth of the powerless state. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Woo-Cumings M (1999) The development state. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jongwon Choi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Choi, J., Choi, T. (2017). Changes in the Political, Social and Economic Environment of Public Policy in South Korea After the 1980s. In: Choi, J., Kwon, Hj., Koo, M. (eds) The Korean Government and Public Policies in a Development Nexus. The Political Economy of the Asia Pacific. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52473-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics