Advertisement

Research in Progress: Implementation of an Integrated Data Model for an Improved Monitoring of Environmental Processes

  • Robert SchimaEmail author
  • Tobias Goblirsch
  • Christoph Salbach
  • Bogdan Franczyk
  • Michael Aleithe
  • Jan Bumberger
  • Peter Dietrich
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 263)

Abstract

How can we benefit from innovative open-source technologies such as mobile sensors and open data platforms in the field of environmental monitoring? Due to the fact that we are facing challenging problems in terms of climate change, urbanization and a growing world population, new strategies for a more comprehensive environmental monitoring have to be developed. Here, we need to create user-specific and easy to use infrastructures as assistance tools for a comprehensive and mobile data acquisition, data processing and data provision. With regard to the variety of existing data sources, data acquisition tools and scales, this paper is focused on strategies and methods for an service oriented monitoring approach based on an integrated data model. To this end, a formal connection was defined by combining spatial, temporal and contextual information of sensor readings into one measure called the individual specific exposure (ISE), which will be later extended to a predictive individual exposure by using historical data.

Keywords

Environmental monitoring Mobile data acquisition Individual Specific Exposure Data integration Fusion of data 

References

  1. 1.
    Banzhaf, E., de la Barrera, F., Kindler, A., Reyes-Paecke, S., Schlink, U., Welz, J., Kabisch, S.: A conceptual framework for integrated analysis of environmental quality and quality of life. Ecol. Ind. 45, 664–668 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Paasche, H., Eberle, D., Das, S., Cooper, A., Debba, P., Dietrich, P., Dudeni-Thlone, N., Gläßer, C., Kijko, A., Knobloch, A., Lausch, A., Meyer, U., Smit, A., Stettler, E., Werban, U.: Are earth sciences lagging behind in data integration methodologies? Environ. Earth Sci. 71(4), 1997–2003 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reis, S., Seto, E., Northcross, A., Quinn, N.W., Convertino, M., Jones, R.L., Maier, H.R., Schlink, U., Steinle, S., Vieno, M., Wimberly, M.C.: Integrating modelling and smart sensors for environmental and human health. Environ. Model. Softw. 74, 238–246 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wu, H., Reis, S., Lin, C., Beverland, I.J., Heal, M.R.: Identifying drivers for the intra-urban spatial variability of airborne particulate matter components and their interrelationships. Atmos. Environ. 112, 306–316 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Steinle, S., Reis, S., Sabel, C.E., Semple, S., Twigg, M.M., Braban, C.F., Leeson, S.R., Heal, M.R., Harrison, D., Lin, C., Wu, H.: Personal exposure monitoring of pm 2.5 in indoor and outdoor microenvironments. Sci. Total Environ. 508, 383–394 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weber, S., Sadoff, N., Zell, E., de Sherbinin, A.: Policy-relevant indicators for mapping the vulnerability of urban populations to extreme heat events: a case study of philadelphia. Appl. Geogr. 63, 231–243 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ho, H.C., Knudby, A., Xu, Y., Hodul, M., Aminipouri, M.: A comparison of urban heat islands mapped using skin temperature, air temperature, and apparent temperature (humidex), for the greater vancouver area. Sci. Total Environ. 544, 929–938 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hart, J.K., Martinez, K.: Toward an environmental internet of things. Earth Space Sci. 2(5), 194–200 (2015). 2014EA000044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuhlbusch, T.A., Quincey, P., Fuller, G.W., Kelly, F., Mudway, I., Viana, M., Querol, X., Alastuey, A., Katsouyanni, K., Weijers, E., Borowiak, A., Gehrig, R., Hueglin, C., Bruckmann, P., Favez, O., Sciare, J., Hoffmann, B., EspenYttri, K., Torseth, K., Sager, U., Asbach, C., Quass, U.: New directions: the future of European urban air quality monitoring. Atmos. Environ. 87, 258–260 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hester, R., Harrison, R.M.: Air Quality in Urban Environments. Issues in Environmental Science and Technology. RSC Publishing, London (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weijers, E., Khlystov, A., Kos, G., Erisman, J.: Variability of particulate matter concentrations along roads and motorways determined by a moving measurement unit. Atmos. Environ. 38(19), 2993–3002 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jimnez-Muoz, J.C., Sobrino, J.A., Skokovic, A., Mattar, C., Cristbal, J.: Land surface temperature retrieval methods from landsat-8 thermal infrared sensor data. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 11(10), 1840–1843 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Schima
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tobias Goblirsch
    • 2
  • Christoph Salbach
    • 3
  • Bogdan Franczyk
    • 2
  • Michael Aleithe
    • 2
  • Jan Bumberger
    • 1
  • Peter Dietrich
    • 1
  1. 1.Department Monitoring and Exploration TechnologiesUFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental ResearchLeipzigGermany
  2. 2.Chair of Information Management, Faculty of Economics and Management ScienceUniversity of LeipzigLeipzigGermany
  3. 3.Department Landscape EcologyUFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental ResearchLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations