Assessment of Business Benefits for the Operation of a Smart City Energy Management Platform

  • Stefan ReichertEmail author
  • Jens Strüker
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 263)


Managing energy production and consumption on a city level is an important, yet challenging task, since an increasing number of volatile renewable energies are being connected to the grid. Smart city energy management platforms could constitute a powerful tool for the involved market actors to effectively integrate renewable energies and thereby to refine existing business models. However, the implementation of such energy management tools is often hindered by privacy concerns or the lack of awareness about connected business benefits. In this paper, we present the concept for a decision support system that is tested in two pilot cities in Croatia and Bulgaria. Furthermore, we present a framework for the identification of the business benefits that are connected with the implementation of such a tool.


Business processes Smart city energy management Decision support system Benefit evaluation framework 



The research presented in this article is funded by the FP7 framework’s ICT-2013.6.4 Optimising Energy Systems in Smart Cities, project iURBAN (, under grant agreement number 608712.


  1. 1.
    Scholz, R., Beckmann, M., Pieper, C., Muster, M., Weber, R.: Considerations on providing the energy needs using exclusively renewable sources. energiewende in Germany. In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 35, pp. 109–125 (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cities, Towns and Renewable Energy: Yes in My Front Yard. International Energy Agents (IEA) (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Watson, R.T., Boudreau, M.-C., Chen, A., Huber, M.H.: Green is: building sustainable business practices. Information Systems (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stromback, J., Dromacque, C., Yassin, M.H.: The potential of smart meter enabled programs to increase energy and systems efficiency: a mass pilot comparison. A Report for the European Smart Metering Industry Group (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    McHenry, M.P.: Technical and governance considerations for advanced metering infrastructure/smart meters: technology, security, uncertainty, costs, benefits, and risks. Energy Policy 59, 834–842 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Strüker, J., van Dinther, C.: Demand response in smart grids: research opportunities for the IS discipline. In: 18th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) Proceedings, Seattle, Washington, 9–11 August 2012Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jurado, S., Fernandez, A., Avellana, N., Oates, M., Müller, G., Perse, T.: Tailoring the next generation energy management tool for smart cities. Sustainable Built Environment (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boer, P.F.: The Valuation of Technology: Business and Financial Issues in R&D. Wiley, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Curtin, J.P.. Gaffney, R.L., Riggins, F.J.: The RFID e-valuation framework – determining the business value from radio frequency identification. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee, H., Özer, Ö.: Unlocking the value of RFID. Prod. Oper. Manage. 16(1), 40–64 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Laubacher, R., Kothari, S.P., Malone T.W., Subirana, B.: What is RFID worth to your company? MIT Sloan School Paper #224, Cambridge, USA (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baars, H., Gille, D., Strüker, J.: Evaluation of RFID applications for logistics: a framework for identifying, forecasting and assessing benefits. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 18(6), 578–591 (2009) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Feuerriegel, S., Neumann, D.: Measuring the financial impact of demand response for electricity retailers. Energy Policy 65, 359–368 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Scholl, H.J., AlAwadhi, S.: Smart governance as key to multi-jurisdictional smart city initiatives: the case of the eCityGov Alliance. Social Science Information (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Römer, B., Reichhardt, P., Kranz, J., Picot, A.: The role of smart metering and decentralized electricity storage for smart grids: the importance of positive externalities. Energy Policy 50, 486–495 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für Informatik und GesellschaftAlbert-Ludwigs-Universität FreiburgFreiburgGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Energy Economics (INEWI)IdsteinGermany

Personalised recommendations