Best Practices in the Design of a Citizen Focused Crisis Management Platform

Chapter
Part of the Transactions on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence book series (TRACOSCI)

Abstract

By reviewing current practice, research, and major current projects, this chapter explores a number of technological aspects of contemporary crisis management, in order to synthesize some best practice guidelines for the designers of crisis management platforms. Experiences gained from the European ATHENA Project, in particular, are used to inform the guidelines. Aspects covered include the use of social media, preventing information overload, types of user interface to use, the use of smart mobile devices and applications, and the automated assessment of information credibility and priority.

Keywords

Crisis management platform Social media ATHENA Command and control Machine learning Search and rescue 

References

  1. 1.
    Andrews, S., Gibson, H., Domdouzis, K., & Akhgar, B. (2016). Creating corroborated crisis reports from social media data through formal concept analysis. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 47, 287–312.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andrews, S., Yates, S., Akhgar, B., & Fortune, D. (2013). The ATHENA Project: Using formal concept analysis to facilitate the actions of responders in a crisis situation. Strategic intelligence management: National security imperatives and information and communication technologies (pp. 167–180). Elsevier: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    ATHENA. (2016). “The European ATHENA Project—Use of new smart devices and social media in crisis situations. Retrieved September, 2016, from http://www.projectathena.eu/
  4. 4.
    Bird, D., Ling, M., & Haynes, K. (2012). Flooding Facebook—The use of social media during the Queensland and Victorian floods. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 27(1), 27.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boston Children’s Hospital: HealthMap. (2016). Retrieved September, 2016, from http://www.healthmap.org/en/
  6. 6.
    Boulos, M. N. K., Resch, B., Crowley, D. N., Breslin, J. G., Sohn, G., Burtner, R., et al. (2011). Crowdsourcing, citizen sensing and sensor web technologies for public and environmental health surveillance and crisis management: Trends, OGC standards and application examples. International Journal of Health Geographics, 10, 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Briggs, D., & Baker, S. A. (2012). From the criminal crowd to the ‘mediated crowd’: The impact of social media on the 2011 English riots. Safer Communities, 11(1), 40–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., & Poblete, B. (2011). Information credibility on twitter. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 675–684). ACM.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chan, J. C. (2010). The role of social media in crisis preparedness, response and recovery (Vanguard).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cole, R. (2009). Social media: What does it mean for public managers? Public Management, 91(9), 8–12.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    COSMIC. (2014). The European COSMIC Project—Contribution of social media in crisis management. Retrieved September, 2016, from http://www.cosmic-project.eu/
  12. 12.
    Dutch Ministry of Security and Justice. (2016). Retrieved September, 2016, from http://www.crisis.nl/
  13. 13.
    EmerGent. (2014). The European EmerGent Project—Emergency management in the social media generation. Retrieved September, 2016, from http://www.fp7-emergent.eu/
  14. 14.
    Engemann, K. J., & Miller, H. E. (1992). Operations risk management at a major bank. Interfaces, 22(6), 140–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Flizikowski, A., Przybyszewski, M., Stachowicz, A., Olejniczak, T., & Renk, R. (2015). Text analysis tool tweet locator–TAT2. In Proceedings of the 12th International ISCRAM Conference. Kristiansand, Norway.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    GeoVISTA. (2011). SensePlace2. Retrieved September, 2016, from http://www.geovista.psu.edu/SensePlace2/
  17. 17.
    Gupta, A., & Kumaraguru, P. (2012). Credibility ranking of tweets during high impact events. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Privacy and Security in Online Social Media (p. 2). ACM.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hale, J. E., Dulek, R. E., & Hale, D. P. (2005). Crisis response communication challenges building theory from qualitative data. Journal of Business Communication, 42(2), 112–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Heinzelman, J., & Waters, C. (2010) Crowdsourcing crisis information in disaster-affected Haiti. US Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hore, R. (2012). SARLOC mountain rescue application. Retrieved September, 2016, from http://www.go4awalk.com/the-bunkhouse/walking-news-and-discussions/walking-news-and-discussions.php?news=710222
  21. 21.
    IRIN. (2016). The inside story on emergencies. Retrieved September, 2016, from http://www.irinnews.org/
  22. 22.
    ISAR+. (2015). The European ISAR+ Project—Online and mobile communications for crisis response and search and rescue. Retrieved September, 2016, from http://isar.i112.eu/index.html
  23. 23.
    Kaufhold, M. A., & Reuter, C. (2016). The self-organization of digital volunteers across social media: The case of the 2013 European floods in Germany. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 13(1), 137–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kotsiopoulos, I. (2014). Social media in crisis management: Role, potential, and risk. In: Utility and Cloud Computing (UCC). 2014 IEEE/ACM 7th International Conference (pp. 681–686). IEEE.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Merchant, R. M., Elmer, S., & Lurie, N. (2011). Integrating social media into emergency-preparedness efforts. The New England Journal of Medicine, 365, 289–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Metron. (2014). SARApp, search and rescue application. Retrieved September, 2016, from http://www.sarapp.com/
  27. 27.
    MissionMode. (2016). Mobile control. Retrieved September 26, 2016, from http://www.missionmode.com/solutions/-module/mobile-control/
  28. 28.
    Redhum. (2016). Humanitarian information network for Latin America and the Caribbean. Retrieved September, 2016, from http://www.redhum.org/
  29. 29.
    Reuter, C., Ludwig, T., Kaufhold, M. A., & Spielhofer, T. (2016). Emergency services attitudes towards social media: A quantitative and qualitative survey across Europe. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 95, 96–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sahana Foundation. (2016). Open source disaster management software. Retrieved September, 2016, https://sahanafoundation.org/
  31. 31.
    Ulmer, R. R., Sellnow, T. L., & Seeger, M. W. (2013). Effective crisis communication: Moving from crisis to opportunity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA). (2016). Reliefweb. Retrieved September, 2016, http://reliefweb.int/
  33. 33.
    Ushahidi. (2016). Read the crowd. Retrieved September, 2016, from https://www.ushahidi.com/
  34. 34.
    Weaver, A. C., Boyle, J. P., & Besaleva, L. I. (2012). Applications and trust issues when crowdsourcing a crisis. In 2012 21st International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    White, C. M. (2011). Social media, crisis communication, and emergency management: Leveraging Web 2.0 technologies. New York: CRC Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CENTRIC, Sheffield Hallam UniversitySheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations