Skip to main content

The God-Signifier and the Ontological Continuum

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Ontology of Gods
  • 306 Accesses

Abstract

Engaging the ontological issues involved in conceptualizing the supernatural, Chapter 4, entitled “The God-Signifier and the Ontological Continuum,” argues that religions/quasi-religions reveal God-conceptions of varied ontologies. Section 4.1, “From Beings to Metaphors,” claims that God is variously conceptualized along a continuum, as a being, a cosmic intelligence, a universal consciousness, a realm of the human consciousness, an impersonal force, a principle, and a metaphorical link among events/phenomena. Enchantment and disenchantment represent a movement along this continuum. Section 4.2 shows how natural, metaphysical, and quasi-metaphysical concepts are cognitive tropes that help deal with the complex world process. Section 4.3, “Attractive to Cathect,” addresses the question of what prompted a choice among these, with focus on psychic economy and the need for intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Here I have primarily relied on Karen Armstrong’s A History of God (1999), Sergei Tokarev’s History of Religion (1989), and Mircea Eliade’s From Primitives to Zen: A Thematic Sourcebook of the History of Religions (1967).

  2. 2.

    Spengler recognizes eight Hochkulturen (high cultures), namely Babylonian, Egyptian, Chinese, Indian, Mexican (Mayan/Aztec), Classical, Magian, and Faustian, but devotes most of his discussion to the last three. Classical or Apollonian culture is his term for cultures of Mediterranean antiquity – the Graeco-Roman. Magian culture consists of Jewish, Aramaic, Nestorian, Zoroastrian-Persian, and Islamic elements, Islam being “the final expression” of the Magian soul. Modern Western or “Euro-American” culture is what he calls “Faustian.” The world feeling (or soul) of a culture expresses itself in political systems, structures and styles of government, social forms, laws, manners and morals, religion, art, science, mathematics, and economy. Spengler indicates the holistic cultural significance of myriad phenomena repeatedly using the famous lines from Goethe’s Faust II: Alles vergängliche ist nur ein Gleichnis (All that passes is a symbol). Every culture has an Ur-symbol, or prime symbol, chosen at the time of its awakening, through which it apprehends the world, and endeavours to overcome the fear of death. The symbols of a culture are an expression of its inner world feeling, and are meaningful to its members alone; they are incomprehensible to outsiders, who do not share its world feeling. The prime symbol of the ancient Egyptian culture was “the way” (even beyond life), actualized in the pyramid, the tomb temple, and the sarcophagus. The Magian soul expresses itself in the cavern-idea, symbolized by the central dome of a mosque. The prime symbol of the Classical/Apollonian culture is the definite, separate body, whose beauty was appreciated, but which conception, according to Spengler, accounted for the “limited” world view of the Greeks and their “rigid” forms in every sphere of life. The prime symbol of the Faustian culture is “pure and limitless space” (183). See Jibu Mathew George, “The Great War and the Course of Civilizations: Reading Oswald Spengler’s The Decline of the West” (2016) for a concise treatment of Spengler’s thesis.

  3. 3.

    In its encounter with the other, labelling and stereotyping are the mind’s some of the many effort-saving devices.

  4. 4.

    Buber’s philosophy is based on a distinction between two relations with the “other”: a You-relation, which recognizes the subjectivity of the other as another I, and an It-relation, which merely objectifies and uses the other.

References

  • Armstrong, Karen. 1999. A history of God. From Abraham to the present: The 4000-year quest for God. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, Walter. 1973. Charles Baudelaire: A lyric poet in the era of high capitalism. Trans. Zohn. Harry. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, Henri. 1922. Creative evolution. Trans. Arthur Mitchell. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, Pascal. 1994. The naturalness of religious ideas: A cognitive theory of religion. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buber, Martin. 1970. I and thou: A new translation with a prologue “I and you” and notes by Walter Kaufmann. New York: Scribner’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliade, Mircea. 1967. From primitives to Zen: A thematic sourcebook of the history of religions. London: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, Susan T., and Shelley E. Taylor. 2013. Social cognition: From brains to culture. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • George, Jibu Mathew. 2016. The Great War and the course of civilizations: Reading Oswald Spengler’s The decline of the west. In World War I revisited: Perspectives and resonances. Ed. Kumar. Sanjay Hyderabad: EFL University Press, 25–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Kurt, and Daniel Wegner. 2010. Blaming God for our pain: Human suffering and the divine mind. Personality and Social Psychology Review 14(1): 7–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1977. The phenomenology of spirit. Trans. A. V. Miller. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schopenhauer, Arthur. 1968. The world as will and representation. Trans. E. F. J. Payne. Vol. 1. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spengler, Oswald. 1926. The decline of the West. 2 vols. Trans. Charles Francis Atkinson. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinoza, Baruch. 1985. Ethics. In The collected works of Spinoza. 1 vol. Trans. and Ed. Edwin Curley. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tokarev, Sergei. 1989. History of religion. Moscow: Progress.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

George, J.M. (2017). The God-Signifier and the Ontological Continuum. In: The Ontology of Gods. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52359-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics