Advertisement

Floods and Drainage Basin Features

  • Zekâi ŞenEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Floods occur not only because of the rainfall but also the surface features, which collects, converges, and diverges of the after rain runoff flows through natural or artificial channels. The significance of topographic maps, satellite images, and digital elevation model (DEM) data, if available. The treatment of these data sources for the purpose of flood evaluation and prediction of various softwares are used, which take into consideration a set of morphological (physiographic) features. The basic definitions of various surface features are presented in a conceptual and rational manner so that the reader can appreciate the significance and the partial effect of each feature to overall flood discharge. The significance of cross sections with their hydraulic properties so as to calculate the surface water flow speed is described in detail with the cooperation of the rating curve concepts and their practical importance in any flood and early flood system setups. The most important part of the flood modeling is to reach flood maps in terms of inundation maps, which are missing in many parts of the world. Standard hypsographic curves and their relationship to the flood discharge calculation and classification are explained. Finally, early flood discharge formulations that are related simply to the drainage area are presented in the forms of equations and graphical representations with comparisons and restrictive limitations.

Keywords

Channel slope Cross section Drainage area discharge relationship Digital elevation model (DEM) Drainage area Drainage basin Flash flood Flood Hypsographic curve Inundation Rating curve 

References

  1. Al-Abed, N., Al-Sharif, M. (2008). Hydrological modeling of Zarqa river basin –Jordan using the hydrologicalsimulation program –FORTRAN (HSPF) Model. Water Resoures Management, 22:1203–1220.Google Scholar
  2. Alashan, S., Şen, Z., & Toprak, Z. F. (2016). Hydroelectric energy potential of Turkey: a refined calculation method. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, Vol. 41(4), 1511–1520. Google Scholar
  3. Bernhardsen, T. (1999). Geographic information systems: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Bolstad, P. V., & Stowe, A. (1994). An evaluation of DEM accuracy: Elevation, slope, and aspects. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 60(11), 1327–1332.Google Scholar
  5. Burrough, P. A. (1986). Principles of geographical information systems for land resources assessment. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, L. B. (2002). Introduction to remote sensing (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  7. Chrysoulakis, N., Spiliotopoulos, M., Domenikiotis, C., & Dalezios, N. (2003). Towards monitoring of regional atmospheric instability through MODIS/Aqua images. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium held at Volos, (pp. 7–9). Greece.Google Scholar
  8. Chorley, R. J., Malm, D. E., & Pogorzelski, H. A. (1957). A new standard for estimating drainage basin shape. American Journal of Science, Vol. 255, 138–141.Google Scholar
  9. Dein, M. A. (1985). Estimation of floods and recharge volumes in wadis Fatimah, Na’man and Turabah. Unpublished M.Sc. thesis, Faculty of Earth Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia, 127 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Felicisimo, A. M. (1994). Parametric statistical method for error detection in digital elevation models. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 49, 29–33.Google Scholar
  11. Felicisimo, A. M. (1995). Error propagation analysis in slope estimation by means of digital elevation models. In Cartography Crossing Borders: Proceedings of the 17th International Cartographic Conference and 10th General Assembly of International Cartographic Association, (pp. 9–94). InstitutCartogra®cdeCatalunya: Barcelona.Google Scholar
  12. Hirano, A., Welch, R., & Lang, H. (2003). Mapping from ASTER stereo image data: DEM validation and accuracy assessment. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 57, 356–370.Google Scholar
  13. Horton, R. E. (1945). Erosional development of stream & their drainage basin; Hydrogeological approach to quantitative morphology. Geological Society of America Bulletin, Vol. 56: 75–370.Google Scholar
  14. Jordan, G. (2003). Morphometric analysis and tectonic interpretation of digital terrain data: A case study. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 28, 807–822.Google Scholar
  15. Kamp, U., Bolch, T., & Olsenholler, J. (2003). DEM generation from ASTER satellite data for geomorphic analysis of Cerro Sillajhuay Chile/Bolivia. In Proceedings of ASPRS Annual Conference, Anchorage, Alaska.Google Scholar
  16. Leopold, L. B., et al., (1964). “Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology”. W.H. Freeman and Company San Francisco and London.Google Scholar
  17. Maidment, D. R. (1983). Handbook of hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Muller, A. B. (1974). Desalination by salt replacement and ultrafiltration. Desalination Research Report No. 1, Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
  19. Polis, G. A., Power, M. E., & Huxel, G. R. (Eds.). (2004). Food webs at the landscape level. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Sabins, F. F. (1997). Remote Sensing Principles and interpretation. (3rd ed., p. 448). W.H. Freeman and Company: New York.Google Scholar
  21. Schmudde, T. H. (1968). “Floodplain”. In R.W. Fairbridge (Ed.), “The Encyclopedia of Geomorphology”. New York: Reinhold: 359–362.Google Scholar
  22. Schumm, S. A. (1959). The relation of drainage basin relief to sediment loss. International Association of Scientific Hydrology, Vol. 36, 216–219.Google Scholar
  23. Şen, Z. (1999). Terrain topography classification for wind energy generation. Renewable Energy, 16(1–4), 904–907.Google Scholar
  24. Şen, Z. (2008). Wadi Hydrology (p. 346). New York: Taylor and Francis Group, CRC Press.Google Scholar
  25. Seyhan, E. (1977). The Watershed as an Hydrology Unit. Geografisch Instituut Transitorium II Heidelberglaan 2, Utrecht, Netherland.Google Scholar
  26. Strahler, A. N. (1950). Equilibrium theory of erosional slopes approached by frequency distribution analyses, American Journal of Science, 248, 673–696.Google Scholar
  27. Strahler, A. N. (1964). Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basin and channel network. In VT Chow (Ed.), Handbook of Applied Hydrology, sec-4-II, McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Weibel, R, & Heller, M. (1991). Digital terrain modelling. In Goodchild M F, Maguire D J, Rhind D W (Eds.), Geographical information systems: principles and applications,(Vol. 2, pp. 269–297). John Wiley & Sons Inc.: Harlow, Longman/New York.Google Scholar
  29. Wood, J. D., & Fisher, P. J. (1993). Assessing interpolation accuracy in elevation models. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 13, 48–56.Google Scholar
  30. Welch, R. (1990). 3-D terrain modeling for GIS applications. GIS World, 3(5), 26–30.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Department of Civil EngineeringIstanbul Medipol UniversityBeykoz, IstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations