Skip to main content

Rehabilitation Following Peripheral Nerve Injury

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The impact of a peripheral nerve injury (PNI) on an individual’s function ranges from moderate and temporary to significant and life changing, depending upon the severity and location of the injury and patient-specific factors. The functional loss that results from a PNI can be sensory, motor or sensory, and motor in nature. The quality of life (QoL) for these patients is substantially reduced with approximately 25% of patients still out of the workforce 1.5 years after surgery (as cited by Davis et al. [5]). Not only do patients lose function, unfortunately they may also gain function in the form of persistent pain, hyperesthesia, hyperalgesia, or allodynia. Rehabilitation following injury to a peripheral nerve is essential to optimize function and outcomes. Clinical studies have demonstrated that patients that receive hand therapy tailored to their needs have better outcomes, for example, for sensory function, than patients that do not receive treatment [3, 17]. Rehabilitation of PNI in the upper extremity is performed by occupational and physical therapists; many of these therapists have the additional qualification of “hand therapist,” which indicates additional training in this specialty practice area of both professions. Worldwide, there are about 8500 therapists that practice “hand therapy” [9]. The hand therapist tailors the treatment in response to the functional loss that the patient presents with. Not only functional loss will be addressed in therapy. The so-called gain in function, mainly in sensory input as hyperesthesia, hyperalgesia, or allodynia, will be addressed in therapy as well. Thus, the course of therapy may be highly variable between patients: some need functional therapy and intense sensory rehabilitation, and for others afflicted with intense pain, pain treatment and education about pain management will be given a greater priority in therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Arakawa T, Shigyo H, Kishibe K, Adachi M, Nonaka S, Harabuchi Y. Electrical stimulation prevents apoptosis in denervated skeletal muscle. NeuroRehabilitation. 2010;27:147–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Berchtold M, Beckmann-Fries V, Meier Zürcher C. Optimal scar management techniques for optimal hand function and aesthetics. IFSSH Ezine. 2016;6(1):19–23. http://www.ifssh.info/ezine.html.

  3. Cheng AS, Hung LK, Wong JM, Lau H, Chan J. A prospective study of early tactile stimulation after digital nerve repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;384:169–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chu M, Chan R, Leung Y, Fung Y. Desensitization of finger tip injury. Tech Hand Upper Extrem Surg. 2001;5(1):63–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Davis K, Taylor K, Anastakis K. Nerve injury triggers changes in the brain. Neuroscientist. 2011;17(4):407–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Duff SV, Estilow T. Chapter 45: Therapist’s management of peripheral nerve injury. In: Skirven T, Osterman L, Fedorczyk J, et al., editors. Rehabilitation of the hand and upper extremity. 6th ed. St Louis: Elsevier; 2011. p. 620. , 619–33.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Elbert T, Rockstroh B. Reorganization of human cerebral cortex: the range of changes following use and injury. Neuroscientist. 2004;10(2):129–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Elliot D. Surgical management of painful peripheral nerves. Clin Plast Surg. 2014;41(3):589–613.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ewald S, Wendling W. What does the practice of hand therapy look like in IFSHT member countries? IFSSH Ezine. 2015;5(3):22–5. http://www.ifssh.info/ezine.html.

  10. Göransson I, Cederlund R. A study of the effect of desensitization on hyperaesthesia in the hand and upper extremity after injury or surgery. Hand Therapy. 2011;16:12–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hundepool CA, Ultee J, THJ N, Houpt P, Research Group ‘ZERO’, Hovius SER, et al. Prognostic factors for outcome after median, ulnar, and combined medianeulnar nerve injuries: a prospective study. Br J Plast Surg. 2015;68(1):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lee SK, Wolfe SW. Peripheral nerve injury and repair. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000;8(4):243–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lundborg G, Björkman A, Rosén B. Enhanced sensory relearning after nerve repair by using repeated forearm anaesthesia: aspects on time dynamics of treatment. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2007;100:121–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Moscony AMB. Peripheral nerve problems. In: Cooper C, editor. Fundamentals of hand therapy. 2nd ed. Elsevier Inc: St Louis; 2014. p. 272–311.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Merzenich MM, Jenkins WM. Reorganization of cortical representation of the hand following alterations of skin inputs induced by nerve injury, skin island transfers and experience. J Hand Ther. 1993;6(2):89–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Novak CB, von der Heyde RL. Evidence and techniques in rehabilitation following nerve injuries. Hand Clin. 2013;29(3):383–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosén B, Vikström P, Turner S, McGrouther DA, Selles RW, Schreuders TAR, Björkman A. Enhanced early sensory outcome after nerve repair as a result of immediate post-operative re-learning: a randomized controlled trial. J Hand Surg. 2015;40E:598–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosén B, Björkman A, Lundborg G. Improved sensory relearning after nerve repair induced by selective temporary anaesthesia- a new concept in hand rehabilitation. J Hand Surg. 2006;31B(2):126–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rosén B, Lundborg G. Enhanced sensory recovery after median nerve repair using cortical audio-tactile interaction. A randomised multicentre study. J Hand Surg. 2007;32E(1):31–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rosén B, Lundborg G. A model instrument for the documentation of outcome after nerve reapir. J Hand Surg. 2000;25A:535–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rosén B, Lundborg G. A new model instrument for outcome after nerve repair. Hand Clin. 2003;19:463–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Slutsky DJ. Chapter 44: New advances in nerve repair. In: Skirven T, Osterman L, Fedorczyk J, et al., editors. Rehabilitation of the hand and upper extremity. 6th ed. St Louis: Elsevier; 2011. p. 611–8.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Spicher C. Handbook for somatosensory rehabilitation. Paris: Saueramps Medical; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Taylor KS, Anastakis DJ, Davis KD. Chronic pain and sensorimotor deficits following peripheral nerve injury. Pain. 2010;151(3):582–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vordemvenne T, Langer M, Ochman S, Raschke M, Schult M. Long-term results after primary microsurgical repair of ulnar and median nerve injuries: a comparison of common score systems. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2007;109:263–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Waldham M. Peripheral nerve injuries. Trauma. 2003;5:79–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang Y, Sunitha M, Chung K. How to measure outcomes of peripheral nerve surgery. Hand Clin. 2013;29(3):349–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Wojtkiewicz DM, Saunders J, Domeshek L, Novak CB, Kaskutas V, Mackinnon SE. Social impact of peripheral nerve injuries. Hand. 2015;10(2):161–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yerxa EJ, Barber LM, Diaz O, Black W, Azen SP. Development of a hand sensitivity test for the hypersensitive hand. Am J Occup Ther. 1983;37:176–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah G. Ewald OTR, MA Ed .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ewald, S.G., Beckmann-Fries, V. (2017). Rehabilitation Following Peripheral Nerve Injury. In: Haastert-Talini, K., Assmus, H., Antoniadis, G. (eds) Modern Concepts of Peripheral Nerve Repair. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52319-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52319-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52318-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52319-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics