Skip to main content

Thinking Inside the Box: Applying the Theory of Karma to Make Boundary Judgements in Systemic Interventions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Managing VUCA Through Integrative Self-Management

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

  • 2916 Accesses

Abstract

Systems researchers often combine methodologies to carry out systemic interventions in a purposeful way. Midgley defines a systemic intervention as “purposeful action by an agent to create change in relation to reflection on boundaries”. It is therefore important when undertaking systemic interventions that researchers and practitioners engage in ‘boundary critique ’. This involves making judgements on inclusion, exclusion and marginalization of stakeholders, and on the issues relating to the intervention. Midgley argues that it is impossible for practitioners involved in systemic interventions to become neutral modelers or facilitators. They suggest that practitioners have to explicitly acknowledge these limitations and manage them while making decisions about system boundaries. Midgley et al. also recommend that a systems approach to an intervention should include exploration of stakeholder values and boundaries for analysis, challenge marginalization and use multi-methodologies. This chapter will explore—providing examples of issues faced during systemic interventions from the literature—how the Indian philosophical concept of karma (right action) could assist the ‘thinking inside the box’ that could assist systems researchers to make boundary judgements while carrying out systemic interventions ‘outside the box’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.worldhunger.org/articles/Learn/world%20hunger%20facts%202002.htm

References

  • Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & Smith, D. (1987). Action science: Concepts, methods, and skills for research and intervention. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashokan, M. S. (2015). Karmayogi: A biography of E. Sreedharan. New Delhi: Thomson Press India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandopadhyaya, A. (1964). Scavenger, Bahuroopi Gandhi. G.R. Bhatkal, Popular Prakashan, Bombay Sarvodaya Mandal and Gandhi Research Foundation. http://www.mkgandhi.org/bahurupi/chap06.htm

  • Bartley, C. (2011). An introduction to Indian philosophy. London: Continuum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. (1776). A fragment on government. http://www.constitution.org/jb/frag_gov.htm

  • Bronkhorst, J. (2011). Karma. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. M., & Fee, E. (2008). Spinning for India’s independence. American Journal of Public Health, 98(1), 39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns. (2014). Systemic action research: Changing system dynamics to support sustainable change. Action Research, 12(1), 3–18. doi:10.1177/1476750313513910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, D., & Worsley, S. (2015). Navigating complexity in international development: Facilitating sustainable change at scale. Warwickshire: Practical Action Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1970). Operations research as a profession. Management Science, 17, B37–B53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coghlan, D., & Brannick, T. (2014). Doing research in your own organization. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coghlan, D., & Brydon-Miller, M. (Eds.). (2014). Encyclopaedia of action research (3rd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (1984). Elbow room: The varieties of free will worth wanting. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fals-Borda, O. (1987). The application of participatory research in Latin America. International Sociology, 2(4), 329–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2014). What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview. Project Management Journal, 45(2), 6–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi, M. K. (1921). The collected works of Mahatma Gandhi (Electronic Book). Publications Division Government of India [1999, 98 volumes, 23(14), xx–xx].

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi, M. K. (1942). ‘Quit India’ speech. http://www.mkgandhi.org/speeches/qui.htm

  • Gandhi, M. K. (1957). An autobiography: The story of my experiments with truth (Translated from the original in Gujarati by M. H. Desai). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi, R. (2007). Gandhi: The man, his people and the empire. London: Haus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganguli K. M. tr. (2008/1883-96). The Mahabharata. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundy, S. (1982). Three modes of action research. Curriculum Perspectives, 2(3), 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundy, S. (1987). Curriculum: Product or praxis. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K., & Ramesh, G. (2010). Project management control system of infrastructure SPVs: DMRC—A case study. In G. Ramesh, V. Nagadevara, G. Naik, & A. B. Suraj (Eds.), Public-private partnerships. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interests (2nd ed.). London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B. (1997). Looking back, looking forward: Reflections on the origins of the international participatory action research network, in Toronto, Canada. In Chapter presented at the Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult Continuing Education, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, October 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker, B. (2015). Rule consequentialism. Stanford encyclopaedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consequentialism-rule/

  • Joshi, D. (2002). Gandhiji on Khadi. Mumbai: Gandhi Book Centre. http://www.mkgandhi.org

  • Lewin, K. (1948). Action research and minority problems (republished). In G. W. Lewin (Ed.), Resolving social conflicts; Selected chapters on group dynamics (pp. 201–216). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majmudar, U. (2014). Mahatma Gandhi and the Bhagavad Gita. American Vedantist. http://americanvedantist.org/2014/articles/mahatma-gandhi-and-the-bhagavad-gita/

  • Midgley, G. (2000). Systemic intervention: Philosophy, methodology, and practice. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. (2006). Systemic intervention for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 96(3), 466–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G., Munlo, I., & Brown, M. (1998). The theory and practice of boundary critique: Developing housing services for older people. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 49(5), 467–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, et al. (2007). Practitioner identity in systemic intervention: Reflections on the promotion of environmental health through Maori community development. Systemic Research and Behavioural Science, 24, 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misra, A. (2004). Identity and religion: Foundations of Anti-Islamism In India. New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pant, M. (2014). Participatory action research. In D. Coghlan & M. Brydon-Miller (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of action research (Vol. 2). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panter-Brick, S. (2009). Gandhji’s dream of Hindu-Muslim Unity and its two Offshoots in the Middle East. Durham Anthropology Journal, 16, 54–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2000). The knowing-doing gap: How smart companies turn knowledge into action. Boston, MA: HBS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radhakrishnan, S. (1929). Indian philosophy (Vol. 1). London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, M. A. (2008). Some trends in the praxis of participatory action research. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The Sage handbook of action research: Participatory inquiry and practice (2nd ed., pp. 49–62). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ramnath, N. S. (2012). E Sreedharan: More than the metro man. Forbes India Magazine. http://forbesindia.com/article/leaderhip-award-2012/e-sreedharan-more-than-the-metro-man/33847/1

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry & practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2008). Introduction. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of action research (pp. 1–10). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, J. (2011). Consequences and limits: A critique of consequentialism. Macalester Journal of Philosophy, 17(1), Article 12. http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/philo/vol17/iss1/12

  • Sankaran, S. (2016). Taking action during systems research. In M. Edson, P. Henning & S. Sankaran (Eds.) A guide to systems research—Philosophy, processes and practice. Australia: Springer (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Selener, D. S. (1998). Participatory action research and social change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Participatory Action Research Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2015). Consequentialism. Stanford encyclopaedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consequentialism/

  • Ulrich, W. (1996). Primer to critical systems heuristics for action researchers. Hull: Centre for Systems Studies.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shankar Sankaran .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sankaran, S., Sankaran, G. (2017). Thinking Inside the Box: Applying the Theory of Karma to Make Boundary Judgements in Systemic Interventions. In: Nandram, S., Bindlish, P. (eds) Managing VUCA Through Integrative Self-Management. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52231-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics