Advertisement

Digital Virtual Places: Utopias, Atopias, Heterotopias

  • Golfo Maggini
Chapter
Part of the Contributions to Hermeneutics book series (CONT HERMEN, volume 5)

Abstract

In my paper, I will approach virtual places neither in terms of non-places or atopias, nor in terms of utopias, but in terms of heterotopias. In order to do so I will deal with some major phenomenological commentaries of place in Heidegger before focusing on a series of placial or place-related topics in his 1936–1938 Contributions to Philosophy (From Enowing). In light of the Contributions I will first thematize virtual places indirectly by opening up the triad of calculation/digits, representation/screens, and communication/information bits. Then, I will attempt to relate the treatment of Contributions to a second triad of topics which are directly placial: worldliness and involvement, situatedness and affective attunement, familiarity and homelessness. I will conclude by insisting on the unique heterotopic dwelling that digital places as places of alterity offer us beyond the all too easy topos-atopia and topos-utopia dilemmas.

References

  1. Augé, Mark. 1995. Non-Places. Introduction to An Anthropology of Supermodernity. Trans. J. Howe. London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Borgmann, Albert. 1999. Holding On to Reality. The Nature of Information at the Turn of the Century. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 2004. Is the Internet the Solution to the Problem of Community? In Community in the Digital Age. Philosophy and Practice, ed. A. Feenberg and D. Barney, 53–68. Lanham/Boulder/New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  4. Capurro, Rafael. 1999. Digitaler Weltentwurf. Ein Essay in Heideggerianischer Absicht, http://www.capurrro.de/digit.html. Accessed 5 June 2015.
  5. ———. 2003. Der Rückkehr des Lokalen. In Next Generation Information Society? ed. H. Kubicek, D. Klumpp, and A. Rossnagel, 374–382. Mössingen/Talheim: Talheimer Verlag.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2004. Between Trust and Anxiety. On the Moods of Information Society. Ethical Space: The International Journal of Communication 2(4): 18–21.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 2009. Past, Present, and Future of the Concept of Information. TripleC 7(2): 125–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ———. 2010. Digital Hermeneutics: An Outline. AI & Society 35(1): 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Casey, Edward S. 1990. Heidegger In and Out of Place. In Heidegger: A Centenary Appraisal. The Seventh Annual Symposium of the Simon Silverman Phenomenology Center, 62–98. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 1993. Getting Back into Place. Toward a Renewed Understanding of the Place-World. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Casey, Edward. 1998. The Fate of Place. In A Philosophical History. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  12. Coyne, Richard. 1994. Heidegger and Virtual Reality: The Implications of Heidegger’s Thinking for Computer Representations. Leonardo 27(1): 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ———. 1995. Where in the World Is Cyberspace? In Designing Information Technology in the Postmodern Age. From Method to Metaphor, 147–177. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 2005. The Digital Uncanny. In Spaces, Spatiality and Technology, ed. P. Turner and E. Davenport, 5–18. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. ———. 2007. Thinking Through Virtual Reality: Place, Non-Place and Situated Cognition. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology. Special Issue: Real and Virtual Places 10(3): 26–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. ———. 2010. The Tuning of Place: Sociable Spaces and Pervasive Digital Media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Dastur, Françoise. 2008. Heidegger: espace, lieu, habitation. Les Temps Modernes. Numéro spécial: Martin Heidegger. Qu’appelle-t-on le Lieu? 63: 140–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davies, Char. 2004. Virtual Space. In Space: In Science, Art and Society, ed. F. Penz, G. Radick, and R. Howell, 69–104. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Dodge, Martin, and Rob Kitchin. 2001. Mapping Cyberspace. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Elden, Stuart. 2002. Mapping the Present. Heidegger, Foucault and the Project of a Spatial History. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 2006. Speaking Against Number. Heidegger, Language and the Politics of Calculation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Eldred, Michael. 2009. The Digital Cast of Being. Metaphysics, Mathematics, Cartesianism, Cybernetics, Capitalism, Communication. Heusenstamm: Ontos Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Escoubas, Éliane. 2008. La question de l’espace dans Être et temps. In Lectures d’Être et Temps de Martin Heidegger. Quatre-vingts ans après, ed. P. Cabestan, F. Dastur, and et l’Ecole Française de Daseinsanalyse, 73–86. Paris: Le Cercle Herméneutique Éditeur.Google Scholar
  24. Farrell Krell, David. 1991. Intimations of Mortality, Truth, and Finitude. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Forget, Philippe. 2008. La technique moderne et le rêve d’ubiquité. In Phénoménologie et technique(s), ed. P.-E. Schmit and P.-A. Chardel, 21–44. Paris: Le Cercle Herméneutique Éditeur.Google Scholar
  26. Gunkel, David J. 2007. Thinking Otherwise. Philosophy, Communication, Technology. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Heidegger, Martin. 1976. Building, Dwelling, Thinking. In Poetry, Language, Thought., Trans.-intr. A. Hofstadter, 143–162. New York/San Francisco/London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  28. ———. 1996. Being and Time. A Translation of Sein und Zeit. Trans. J. Stambaugh. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  29. ———. 1999. Contributions to Philosophy (From Enowning). Trans. P. Emad, and K. Maly. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Heim, Michael. 1993. The Metaphysics of Virtual Reality. New York-Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. ———. 1994. Heidegger and Computers. In The Question of Hermeneutics, ed. T.J. Stapleton, 397–423. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Heinrich, Nadin, et al. 2012. Digital Utopia. Über dynamische Architecturen, digitale Sinnlichkeit und Räume von morgen. Berlin: Akademie d. Künste.Google Scholar
  33. Hillis, Ken. 1999. Digital Sensations: Space Identity, and Embodiment in Virtual Reality. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ihde, Don. 2002. Bodies in Technology. Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  35. Introna, Lucas D., and Fernando M. Ilharco. 2006. On the Meaning of Screens: Towards a Phenomenological Account of Screenness. Human Studies 29(1): 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Joyce, M. 1999. On Boundfulness: The Space of Hypertext Bodies. In Virtual Geographies: Bodies, Space, and Relations, ed. M. Crang, P. Crang, and J. May. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Malpas, J.E. 1999. Place and Experience. A Philosophical Topography. Cambridge/New York/Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Malpas, Jeff. 2002. Remembering Place: The Fate of Place by Edward S. Casey. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10(1): 92–100.Google Scholar
  39. ———. 2006. Heidegger’s Topology. Being, Place, World. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  40. ———. 2012. Heidegger and the Thinking of Place. Explorations in the Topology of Being. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Morris, David. 2004. The Sense of Space. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  42. Poster, Mark. 1995. Postmodern Virtualities. In Cyberspace, Cyberbodies, Cyberpunk: Cultures of Technological Embodiment, ed. M. Featherstone and R. Burrows. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  43. Qvortrup, Lars. 2002. Cyberspace as Representation of Space Experience: In Defence of a Phenomenological Approach. In Virtual Space: Spatiality in Virtual Inhabited 3D Worlds, ed. Lars Qvortrup, 5–24. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rheingold, Howard. 2012. Net Smart. How to Thrive Online. Cambridge Mass: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  45. Rushkoff, Douglas. 2002. Cyberia. Life in the Trenches of Hyperspace. Manchester: Clinamen Press.Google Scholar
  46. Russon, John, and Kirsten Jacobson. 2013. Space: The Open in Which We Sojourn. In The Bloomsbury Companion to Heidegger, ed. François Raffoul and Eric S. Nelson, 345–359. London/New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  47. Sallis, John. 2001. Grounders of the Abyss. In Companion to Heidegger’s Contributions to Philosophy, ed. C.E. Scott, S.M. Schoenbohn, et al., 181–197. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Seidler, Jeleniewski V. 1998. Embodied Knowledge and Virtual Space: Gender, Nature and History. In The Virtual Embodied. Presence-Practice-Technology, ed. J. Wood, 15–29. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Shields, Rob. 2003. The Virtual. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Turner, Fred. 2006. From Counterculture to Cyberculture. Steward Brand, The Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vallega, Alejandro A. 2003. Heidegger and the Issue of Space. Thinking on Exilic Grounds. The Pennsylvania State University Press: University Park.Google Scholar
  52. Waldenfels, Bernard. 2009. Ortsverschiebungen, Zeitverschiebungen. Modi leibhaftiger Erfahrung. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of IoanninaIoanninaGreece

Personalised recommendations