Skip to main content

The Diabolic Logic of Logos : Towards a Hermeneutics of Hell in Goethe’s Faust

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Hermeneutics of Hell
  • 683 Accesses

Abstract

In Goethe’s well-known tragedy, the devil figure Mephistopheles exposes Dr. Faust to a new kind of language as yet unfamiliar to the learned theologian—he introduces irony, ambiguity and difference. Thus, Mephistopheles literally is a dia-bolos: he goes in-between, he separates word from meaning, making two out of one. The “success” of his temptation therefore rests on a linguistic premise which one might call a diabolic principle: one word can mean itself and its own opposite simultaneously. Confronted with this confusing, diabolic language, Faust’s traditional theological hermeneutics fail. This chapter seeks to explore how Goethe’s masterpiece is challenging the prevalent eighteenth-century model of hermeneutics based on the hermeneutics of Scripture: the diabolic experiment in Goethe’s Faust is calling for a new hermeneutics—a hermeneutics of hell.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Aristotle, Poetics, ed. and trans. Stephen Halliwell (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, John L. How To Do Things With Words. Second Edition, ed. J.O. Urmson and Marina Sbisà (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, Harold. The Western Canon. The Books and School of the Ages (New York, San Diego, London: Harcourt Brace, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • De Man, Paul. “The Concept of Irony,” Aesthetic Ideology, ed. Andrzej Warminski (Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press, 1996), pp. 163–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, Manfred. “Einleitung,” F.D.E. Schleiermacher, Hermeneutik und Kritik, ed. Manfred Frank (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1977), pp. 7–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaier, Ulrich. „‘Schwankende Gestalten’: virtuality in Goethe’s Faust,“ Goethe’s Faust: Theatre of Modernity, ed. Hans Schulte, John Noyes, Pia Kleber (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 54–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goethe, Johann Wolfgang. Faust I and II, trans. Stuart Atkins (Cambridge, MA: Suhrkamp, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamacher, Werner. „Die andere Übersetzung des Wortes,“ Minetti: Faust-Skriptogramme, ed. Gerhard Ahrens (Berlin/Vienna: Medusa, 1983), pp. 98–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamacher, Werner. “Faust, Geld,” Athenäum. Jahrbuch für Romantik 4, ed. Ernst Behler, Jochen Hörisch, Günter Oesterle (Paderborn: Fink, 1994), pp. 131–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, Peter. “Mephisto is the devil—or is he?” Goethe’s Faust: Theatre of Modernity, ed. Hans Schulte, John Noyes, Pia Kleber (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 40–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, William F. Christ and Apollo. The Dimensions of the Literary Imagination (Notre Dame/London: University of Notre Dame Press, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neusner, Jacob. What is Midrash? (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronning, John L. The Jewish Targums and John’s Logos Theology (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlegel, Friedrich. Lyceum, KFSA 2, ed. Ernst Behler (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1963f.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlegel, Friedrich. Philosophische Lehrjahre 1796-1806 nebst philosophischen Manuskripten aus den Jahren 1796-1828, KFSA 18, ed. Ernst Behler (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1963f.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleiermacher, Friedrich D.E. The Life of Jesus, ed. J.C. Verheyden (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleiermacher, Friedrich D.E. „Über die verschiedenen Methoden des Übersetzens“ [1813], Akademievorträge, ed. Martin Rössler (Berlin/New York: De Gruyter, 2002), pp. 67–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulte, Hans. “Introduction,” Goethe’s Faust: Theatre of Modernity, ed. Hans Schulte, John Noyes, Pia Kleber (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan, Jonathan. The Enlightenment Bible. Translation, Scholarship, Culture (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillmann, Thomas. Hermeneutik und Bibelexegese beim jungen Goethe (Berlin/New York: De Gruyter, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, James. Philology. The Forgotten Origins of the Modern Humanities (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidner, Daniel. Bibel und Literatur um 1800 (Munich: Fink, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sauter, C. (2017). The Diabolic Logic of Logos : Towards a Hermeneutics of Hell in Goethe’s Faust . In: Thuswaldner, G., Russ, D. (eds) The Hermeneutics of Hell. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52198-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics