Skip to main content

The Long Road to a Democratic Networked European Union

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 549 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter offers a critical appraisal of the perspectives over European integration in terms of new governance and particularly networks. This specific case of regional integration has anyway raised intriguing issues, regarding the content and role of democracy, legitimacy, accountability and representation. The road leading to a networked European entity or a networked democracy might still be long, although networked processes or functions have already entailed serious consequences, both practically and normatively. Consequently, democracy appears to be the inevitable—albeit complex—guide during the respective course. In this framework, it is imperative to distinguish between the recognition of the feasibility per se of a post-majoritarian or post-liberal democracy and the correspondence of the emerging European realities to the relevant criteria. Simply put, the current literature tends to emphasize the challenges that the EU poses for political theory or organization as well as for (representative) democracy. This needs not to be refuted, but it still needs to be analyzed dialectically with the fact that democracy itself (however complex or even ambiguous) sets challenges, not to be taken lightly, for the emergence of the euro-polity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Benz, A. (2003). Compounded representation in EU multi-level governance. In B. Kohler-Koch (Ed.), Linking EU and national governance (pp. 82–110). Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blavoukos, S., & Pagoulatos, G. (2008). Negotiating in stages: National positions and the reform of the stability and growth pact. European Journal of Political Research, 47, 247–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohman, J. (2007). Democracy across borders: From Dêmos to Dêmoi. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T. (2010). European governance: Negotiation and competition in the shadow of hierarchy. Journal of Common Market Studies, 48, 191–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coen, D., & Thatcher, M. (2008). Network governance and multi-level delegation: European networks of regulatory agencies. Journal of Public Policy, 28, 49–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bardeleben, J., & Hurrelmann, A. (Eds.). (2007). Democratic dilemmas of multilevel governance. Legitimacy, representation and accountability in the European Union (pp. 1–14). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diez, T. (1997). International ethics and European integration: Federal state or network horizon? Alternatives, 22, 287–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberlein, B., & Kerwer, D. (2004). New governance in the European Union: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Common Market Studies, 42, 121–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberlein, B., & Newman, A. (2008). Escaping the international governance dilemma? Incorporated transgovernmental networks in the European Union. Governance, 21, 25–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eising, R., & Kohler-Koch, B. (1999). Introduction: Network governance in the European Union. In B. Kohler-Koch & R. Eising (Eds.), The transformation of governance in the European Union (pp. 3–12). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgström, O., & Jönsson, C. (Eds.). (2005). European Union negotiations: Processes, networks and institutions. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Føllesdal, A. (2006). Survey article: The legitimacy deficits of the European Union. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 14, 441–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Føllesdal, A., & Hix, S. (2006). Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: A response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44, 533–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fossum, J., & Menendez, A. (2010). The constitution’s gift: A Constitutional theory for a democratic European Union. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Héritier, A. (2003). Composite democracy in Europe: The role of transparency and access to information. Journal of European Public Policy, 10, 814–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hix, S. (1998). The study of the European Union II: The ‘new governance’ agenda and its rival. Journal of European Public Policy, 5, 38–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jachtenfuchs, M., Diez, T., & Jung, S. (1998). Which Europe? Conflicting models of a legitimate political order. European Journal of International Relations, 4, 409–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassim, H., & Le Galès, P. (2010). Exploring governance in a multi-level polity: A policy instruments approach. West European Politics, 33, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kern, K., & Bulkeley, H. (2009). Cities, europeanization and multi-level gGovernance: Governing climate change through transnational municipal networks. Journal of Common Market Studies, 47, 309–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch, B. (1999). Europe in search of legitimate governance. Arena Working Paper 99/27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch, B. (2013). Civil society and democracy in the EU. High expectations under empirical scrutiny. In B. Kohler-Koch & C. Quittkat (Eds.), De-mystification of participatory democracy: EU-governance and civil society (pp. 1–17). Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch, B., & Rittberger, B. (2006). Review article: The ‘governance turn’ in EU studies. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44, 27–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavdas, K., & Chryssochoou, D. (2011). A republic of Europeans: Civic potential in a liberal milieu. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggetti, M., & Gilardi, F. (2014). Network governance and the domestic adoption of soft rules. Journal of European Public Policy, 21, 1293–1310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neunreither, K. (1994). The democratic deficit of the European Union: Closer cooperation between the European parliament and the national parliaments. Government and Opposition, 29, 299–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos, Y. (2005). Taking stock of multi-level governance networks. European Political Science, 4, 316–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, G., & Pierre, J. (2004). Multi-level governance and democracy: A Faustian bargain? In I. Bache & M. Flinders (Eds.), Multi-level governance (pp. 75–89). Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, J. (2009). Policy networks. In A. Wiener & T. Diez (Eds.), European integration theory (2nd ed., pp. 105–124). Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piattoni, S. (2010). The theory of multi-level governance. Conceptual, empirical, and normative challenges. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. (2009). Legitimacy in the multilevel European polity. European Political Science Review, 1, 173–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. (2013). Democracy and legitimacy in the European Union revisited: Input, output and ‘throughput’. Political Studies, 61, 2–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, P. (2006). Governance in the European Union. A viable mechanism for future legitimation? In A. Benz & Y. Papadopoulos (Eds.), Governance and democracy: Comparing national, European and international experiences (pp. 156–175). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schout, A., Jordan, A., & Twena, M. (2010). From ‘old’ to ‘new’ governance in the EU: Explaining a diagnostic deficit. West European Politics, 33, 154–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, E. (2005). Τhe democratic problems and potentials of network governance. European Political Science, 4, 348–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffek, J., & Nanz, P. (2008). Emergent patterns of civil society participation in global and European governance. In J. Steffek, C. Kissling, & P. Nanz (Eds.), Civil society participation in European and global governance: A cure for the democratic deficit? (pp. 1–29). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Suverierol, S. (2008). Beyond the myth of nationality: Analysing networks within the European commission. West European Politics, 31, 701–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurner, P., & Pappi, U. (2008). European Union intergovernmental conferences: Domestic preference formation, transgovernmental networks and the dynamics of vompromise. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torfing, J., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & Sørensen, E. (2012). Interactive governance. Advancing the paradigm. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tsakatika, M. (2007). Governance vs. politics: The European Union’s ‘constitutive’ democratic deficit. Journal of European Public Policy, 14, 867–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warleigh, A. (2003). Democracy and the European Union: Theory, practice and reform. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, K. D. (1999). Defending state sutonomy: Intergovernmental governance in the European Union. In B. Kohler-Koch & R. Eising (Eds.), The transformation of governance in the European Union (pp. 231–248). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zielonka, J. (2006). Europe as empire: The nature of the enlarged European Union. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyriakos Mikelis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mikelis, K. (2017). The Long Road to a Democratic Networked European Union. In: Bitros, G., Kyriazis, N. (eds) Democracy and an Open-Economy World Order. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52168-8_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics