Advertisement

Mastering Information and Teaching Controversies: An Exploratory Study

  • Orélie Desfriches Doria
  • Madjid Ihadjadène
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 676)

Abstract

Our contribution aims at presenting an exploratory study of an experimental course focused on teaching controversies for mastering various dimensions of Information literacy. We will begin presenting the theoretical framework of the Actor-Network Theory approach. Then we will introduce our work-in-progress methodology for controversies analysis. Then, two case studies of teaching controversies will be presented aiming at supporting the acquisition of skills in mastering Information. We will conclude with the first results of our exploratory study based on participant observation, and on a qualitative survey on the knowledge acquisition by the students.

Keywords

Information literacy Controversy analysis Exploratory study Critical thinking Evaluation criteria 

References

  1. 1.
    Chevillotte, S.: Bibliothèques et Information Literacy. Bulletin des Bibliothèques de France 2, 42–49 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Virkus, S.: Information Literacy in Europe: A Literature Review. Information Research 8(4) (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Elmborg, J.: Critical information literacy: implications for instructional practice. J. Acad. Librarianship 32(2), 192–199 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Loicq, M.: Les Enjeux éducatifs de la Culture Informationnelle. Les Cahiers du Numérique 5(3), 71–84 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Koltay, T.: The media and the literacies: media literacy, information literacy, digital literacy. Media Cult. Soc. 33(2), 211–221 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Le Deuff, O.: Littératies Informationnelles, Médiatiques et Numériques: de la Concurrence à la Convergence? Etudes de Commun. 1, 131–147 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bruce, C.: Information literacy as a catalyst for educational change. A background paper. In: Danaher, P.A. (eds) Proceedings of the Lifelong Learning: Whose Responsibility and What is Your Contribution? The 3rd International Lifelong Learning Conference, pp. 8–19, Yeppoon, Queensland (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    American Library Association: Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tuominen, K., Savolainen, R., Talja, S.: Information literacy as a sociotechnical practice1. Libr. 75(3), 329–345 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Le Deuff, O.: Penser la Conception Citoyenne de la Culture de l’information. Les Cahiers du Numérique 5(3), 39–49 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Simonnot, B.: Culture Informationnelle, Culture Numérique: Au-delà de l’utilitaire. Les Cahiers du Numérique 5(3), 25–37 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cordier, A.: Et si on Enseignait l’incertitude pour Construire une Culture de l’information? Commun. Organ. 2, 49–60 (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Venturini, T.: Diving in magma: how to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Publ. Underst. Sci. 19(3), 258–273 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Genard, J.L.: À Propos de Pragmatique…. In: Vrancken, D., et al. (eds.) Penser la négociation, De Boeck Supérieur, «Ouvertures Sociologiques», pp. 97–107 (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Venturini, T.: Building on faults. Public Underst. Sci. 21(7), 796–812 (2012). SAGE Publications, UK and USCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Martin, S., Lezon Rivière, A.: Culture Informationnelle et Enseignement des Controverses. In: Ihadjadene, M., Baltz, C., Saemmer, A. (eds.) Culture Informationnelle. Vers une Propédeutique numérique: Former les citoyens à l’ère de l’Internet. Hermann, Paris (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thévenot, L.: La Connaissance dans l’action, L’action au Pluriel, Paris, La Découverte, «TAP/Politique et société», p. 312 (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chateauraynaud, F.: La Contrainte Argumentative. Les Formes de l’argumentation Entre Cadres Délibératifs et Puissances d’expression Politiques. Revue Européenne des Sciences Sociales XLV(136), 129–148 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Simondon, G.: Du Mode d’existence des Objets Techniques. Aubier, Paris (1989)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stiegler, B.: Prendre soin: Tome 1 De la Jeunesse et des Générations. Flammarion, Paris (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire ElicoUniversité de LyonLyonFrance
  2. 2.Laboratoire ParagrapheUniversité Paris 8Saint-DenisFrance

Personalised recommendations