Information Literacy as a Key to Academic Success: Results from a Longitudinal Study

Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 676)

Abstract

The present paper examines whether university students’ information literacy contributes to their academic performance over and above their level of general cognitive abilities. Fifty-three German psychology students (18–25 years, 85% female) participated in a longitudinal study with four waves of measurement spanning the first 18 months of their bachelor studies. Stepwise multiple regression analyses revealed that scholarly information literacy (as assessed by a fixed-choice test of knowledge about information search and evaluation) predicted university grade point average as well as basic psychology knowledge even when controlling for fluid intelligence. According to additional simple slope analyses, information literacy was able to compensate for limited cognitive ability: Information literacy and academic performance were only associated in students with lower working memory capacity.

Keywords

Information literacy Fluid intelligence Working memory Academic achievements Expertise Higher education Psychology 

References

  1. 1.
    Eisenberg, M.B., Lowe, C.A., Spitzer, K.L.: Information Literacy: Essential Skills for the Information Age. Information Resources Publications, Greenwood Publishing Group, Westport (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Squibb, S.D., Mikkelsen, S.: Assessing the value of course-embedded ınformation literacy on student learning and achievement. Coll. Res. Libr. 77(2), 164–183 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cowan, N.: Working memory underpins cognitive development, learning, and education. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 26(2), 197–223 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gustafsson, J., Balke, G.: General and specific abilities as predictors of school achievement. Multivar. Behav. Res. 28, 407–434 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Morris, S.B., Daisley, R.L., Wheeler, M., Boyer, P.: A meta-analysis of the relationship between individual assessments and job performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 100(1), 5–20 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Roth, B., Becker, N., Romeyke, S., Schäfer, S., Domnick, F., Spinath, F.M.: Intelligence and school grades: a meta-analysis. Intelligence 53, 118–137 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kiliç-Çakmak, E.: Learning strategies and motivational factors predicting ınformation literacy self-efficacy of e-learners. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 26(2), 192–208 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    American Psychological Association: APA Guidelines For The Undergraduate Psychology Major: Version 2.0 (2013). http://www.apa.org/ed/precollege/undergrad/index.aspx
  9. 9.
    Brand-Gruwel, S., Wopereis, I., Vermetten, Y.: Information problem solving by experts and novices: analysis of a complex cognitive skill. Comput. Hum. Behav. 21(3), 487–508 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Johnston, B., Webber, S.: Information literacy in higher education: a review and case study. Stud. High. Educ. 28(3), 335–352 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bowles-Terry, M.: Library instruction and academic success: a mixed-methods assessment of a library instruction program. Evid. Based Libr. Inf. Pract. 7(1), 82–95 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Soria, K.M., Fransen, J., Nackerud, S.: Stacks, serials, search engines, and students’ success: first-year undergraduate students’ library use, academic achievement, and retention. J. Acad. Libr. 40(1), 84–91 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cattell, R.B.: Abilities: Their Structure and Growth. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1971)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Carpenter, P., Just, M., Shell, P.: What one ıntelligence test measures: a theoretical account of the processing in the raven progressive matrices test. Psychol. Rev. 97, 404–431 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Raven, J., Raven, J.C., Court, J.H.: Raven Manual Section 4: Advanced Progressive Matrices. Oxford Psychologists Press, Oxford (1998)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rosman, T., Mayer, A.-K., Krampen, G.: Intelligence, academic self-concept, and information literacy: the role of adequate perceptions of academic ability in the acquisition of knowledge about information searching. Inf. Res. 20(1), 1 (2015). Special Supplement, paper isic34Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Baddeley, A.: Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 63, 1–29 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rosman, T., Mayer, A.-K., Krampen, G.: A longitudinal study on ınformation-seeking knowledge in psychology undergraduates: exploring the role of ınformation literacy ınstruction and working memory capacity. Comput. Educ. 96, 94–108 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Weinert, S., Artelt, C., Prenzel, M., Senkbeil, M., Carstensen, C.H.: Development of competencies across the life span. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 14(2), 67–86 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Baumert, J., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., Brunner, M.: Large-scale student assessment studies measure the results of processes of knowledge acquisition: evidence in support of the distinction between intelligence and student achievement. Educ. Res. Rev. 4(3), 165–176 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hambrick, D.Z., Engle, R.W.: Effects of domain knowledge, working memory capacity, and age on cognitive performance: an investigation of the knowledge-is-power hypothesis. Cogn. Psychol. 44(4), 339–387 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Escher, S., Grabarkiewicz, R., Frese, M., van Steekelenburg, G.: The moderator effect of cognitive ability on the relationship between planning strategies and business success of small scale business owners in south africa: a longitudinal study. J. Dev. Entrepreneurship 7(3), 305–318 (2002)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hamel, R., Schmittmann, V.D.: The 20-minute version as a predictor of the raven advanced progressive matrices test. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 66(6), 1039–1046 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wilhelm, O., Hildebrandt, A., Oberauer, K.: What is working memory capacity, and how can we measure it. Front. Psychol. 4(433), 1–22 (2013)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Leichner, N., Peter, J., Mayer, A.-K., Krampen, G.: Assessing ınformation literacy among german psychology students. Ref. Serv. Rev. 41, 660–674 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Peter, J., Leichner, N., Mayer, A.K., Krampen, G.: A short test for the assessment of basic knowledge in psychology. Psychol. Learn. Teach. 14(3), 224–235 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Griggs, R.A., Bujak-Johnson, A., Proctor, D.L.: Using common core vocabulary in text selection and teaching the introductory course. Teach. Psychol. 31(4), 265–269 (2004)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Aiken, L.S., West, S.G., Reno, R.R.: Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage, Newbury Park (1991)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hayes, A.F.: Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. Guilford Press, New York (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ZPID - Leibniz Institute for Psychology InformationTrierGermany
  2. 2.University of TrierTrierGermany

Personalised recommendations