Skip to main content

Relationality Is the Key: The Family of Digital Competencies’ Catalogues and Their Potential Applications

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 676))

Abstract

The family of digital competencies’ catalogues (DCCs) is being developed as a tool for diagnosis and evaluation of digital competencies of different social groups. It is built on the relativity theory and the concept of functional digital competencies. Different methodologies have been used in the project: desk research, field studies, FGIs and IDIs with experts and professionals. Three DCCs has been developed so far. The most universal DCC framework is currently being applied by the Polish Ministry of Administration and Digitization in information literacy diagnosis and education projects, as well as a benchmark for e-integration programmes within the Operational Programme Digital Poland - 3rd Axis. The other relates to the needs of the 50+ group, considering different levels of their ICT skills and the specifics of their status. The third refers to the SME sector: information competencies, needs, and professional practice of Polish entrepreneurs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bourdieu, P.: Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Routledge, London (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. American Library Association (2000). http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/standards/standards.pdf

  3. Bruce, C.: Information literacy as a catalyst for educational change. A background paper. In: Danaher, P.A. (ed.) The 3rd International Lifelong Learning Conference Proceedings “Lifelong Learning: Whose Responsibility and What is Your Contribution?”, Yeppoon, pp. 8–19 (2004). http://eprints.qut.edu.au/4977/1/4977_1.pdf

  4. Van Dijk, J.: The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Van Deursen, A.J.A.M., Helsper, E.J., Eynon, R.: Measuring Digital Skills. From Digital Skills to Tangible Outcomes Project Report. Oxford (2014). http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/publications/Measuring_Digital_Skills.pdf

  6. Van Deursen, A.J.A.M., Van Dijk, J.A.G.M.: Toward a multifaceted model of internet access for understanding digital divides: an empirical investigation. Inf. Soc. 31(5), 379–391 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Filiciak, M., et al.: The Use of Media and Social Divisions. Centrum Cyfrowe, Warszawa (2013). http://ngoteka.pl/bitstream/handle/item/215/the_use_of_media_and_social_divisions.pdf?sequence=6

  8. Savolainen, R.: Everyday life information seeking: approaching information seeking in the context of “Way of Life”. Libr. Inf. Sci. Res. 17(3), 259–294 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jasiewicz, J., et al.: The Framework Catalogue of Digital Competencies. Ministry of Administration and Digitization, Warszawa (2015). https://mc.gov.pl/files/ramowy_katalog_kompetencji_cyfrowych_final_ang_jj_2.pdf

  10. Tarkowski, A., et al.: Taksonomia Funkcjonalnych Kompetencji Cyfrowych oraz Metodologia Pomiaru Poziomu Funkcjonalnych Kompetencji Cyfrowych Osób z Pokolenia 50+. Stowarzyszenie “Miasta w Internecie”, Warszawa (2015). https://depot.ceon.pl/bitstream/handle/123456789/8309/taksonomia_funkcjonalnych_kompetencji_cyfrowych.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

  11. Buchner, A., Zaniewska, K.: Katalog Kompetencji Cyfrowych Małych Firm. Centrum Cyfrowe, Warszawa (2016). http://centrumcyfrowe.pl/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/IR-katalog-kompetencji.pdf

  12. Big6 Skills Model. http://big6.com/

  13. Lawton, M.P., Brody, E.M.: Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 3(1), 179–186 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Miskelly, F.G.: Assistive technology in elderly care. Age Ageing 30(6), 455–458 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Roley, S., et al.: Occupational therapy practice framework: domain & process. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 62(6), 625–683 (2008). 2nd Edition

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Małgorzata Kisilowska .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kisilowska, M., Jasiewicz, J., Mierzecka, A. (2016). Relationality Is the Key: The Family of Digital Competencies’ Catalogues and Their Potential Applications. In: Kurbanoğlu, S., et al. Information Literacy: Key to an Inclusive Society. ECIL 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 676. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52162-6_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52162-6_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52161-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52162-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics