Advertisement

Risk Analysis in Impact Assessment

  • Martina ZeleňákováEmail author
  • Lenka Zvijáková
Chapter

Abstract

While there are some studies in the literature considering risk analysis in construction projects, studies of risk analysis regarding water management constructions, especially assessment of flood protection structures (FPS), are very limited. In classical project risk-analysis techniques, risk-rating values are calculated by multiplying probability and impact values, but direct analysis of the linguistic factors involved is often neglected. This book introduces a new approach to risk assessment of activities in water management (FPS projects) using risk analysis.

Keywords

Risk Analysis Risk Index Slovak Republic Environmental Impact Assessment Risk Criterion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. AGIP KCO (2004) Regulatory basis of environmental impact assessment current environmental status. Methodological aspects of environmental and socio-economic impact assessment. Methodological aspects of environmental and socio-economic impact assessment. http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/eia/documents/CentralAsiaGuidelines/Annex%204%20-%20English.pdf
  2. Catchpole S, Moreno R (2012) Environmental risk and natural hazards. In: EIA’s IAIA12 conference proceedings’ energy future, the role of impact assessment 32nd annual meeting of the international association for impact assessment 27 May–1 June 2012, Centro de Congresso da Alfândega, Porto, Portugal (www.iaia.org)
  3. CEQ (1978) NEPA (The National Environmental Policy Act) 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq. CEQ, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. DEAT (2002) Ecological risk assessment, integrated environmental management, information series 6. DEAT, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  5. DEAT (2004) Criteria for determining alternatives in EIA, integrated environmental management, information series 11. DEAT, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  6. Demidova O, Cherp A (2005) Risk assessment for improved treatment of health considerations in EIA. Environ Impact Assess Rev 25(4):411–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dikmen I, Birgonul MT, Han S (2007) Using fuzzy risk assessment to rate cost overrun risk in international construction projects. Int J Project Manage 25(5):494–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dub O, Němec J (1969) Hydrology (in Slovak). SNTL, PrahaGoogle Scholar
  9. EC (2001) Guidance on EIA: Scoping. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  10. Glasson J, Therivel R, Chadwick A (1999) Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment, UCL Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Křupka J, Kašparová M, Máchová R (2012) Decision processes (in Czech). UPa, PardubiceGoogle Scholar
  12. Kwiatkowski RE (1998) The role of risk assessment and risk management in environmental assessment. Environmetrics 9(5):587–598Google Scholar
  13. Magness TH (1984) NEPA, the regulations of the US Council on Environmental Quality and the heart of EIA. In: Proceedings of the paper presented to the Dutch-US seminar on environmental management, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  14. Mosný V (2002) Hydrology. Morphology of river basin and discharges (in Slovak). STU, BratislavaGoogle Scholar
  15. National Council of the Slovak Republic (2005) Act of Law No. 24/2006 from December 14th 2005 on environmental impact assessment and on amendments to certain actsGoogle Scholar
  16. Papa MN, Torres DS (2012) Proceedings of the international workshop on flash flood and debris flow risk management in Mediterranean areas. University of Salerno, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  17. Říha J (2001) Environmental impact assessment. Methods for preliminary decision analysis of EIA (in Czech). ČVUT, PrahaGoogle Scholar
  18. Tichý M (2006) Ovládání rizika, analýza a management (Risk control: analysis and management). C. H. Beck, PragueGoogle Scholar
  19. Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z, Tamošaitienë J (2010) Risk assessment of construction projects. J Civil Eng Manag 16(1):33–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zeleňáková M, Gałaś S, Zvijáková L, Šlezingr M (2012) Calculation of risk posed by flood protection measures as part of the environmental impact assessment process. Pol J Environ Stud 21(5A):459–463Google Scholar
  21. Zeleňáková M, Zvijáková L (2012) Proposal of flood protection objects risk calculation (in Slovak). In: SEA/EIA 2012: 2nd international conference, Slovak Environmental Agency, Nízke Tatry, Tále, 29–30 May 2012Google Scholar
  22. Zvijáková L (2012) Proposal of water construction risk calculation (in Slovak). In: Juniorstav 2012. 14th Ph.D. conference, VUT, Brno, 26 Jan 2012Google Scholar
  23. Zvijáková L (2013) The application of risk analysis in the environmental impact assessment (for selected constructions) (in Slovak). Thesis, Technical university of KošiceGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Environmental EngineeringTechnical University of KošiceKošiceSlovakia

Personalised recommendations