Advertisement

Numerical Modeling of High-Velocity Impact Welding

  • Ali NassiriEmail author
  • Shunyi Zhang
  • Tim Abke
  • Anupam Vivek
  • Brad Kinsey
  • Glenn Daehn
Conference paper
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)

Abstract

To support the lightweighting aim in the automotive industry, High-Velocity Impact Welding (HVIW) can be used to join dissimilar metals. The manufacturing industry often relies on numerical simulations to reduce the number of trial-and-error iterations required during the process development to reduce costs. However, this can be difficult in high strain rate manufacturing processes where extremely high plastic strain regions develop. Thus, a traditional Lagrangian analysis is not able to accurately model the process due to excessive element distortion. In order to further understand the science behind HVIW processes and benefits of various numerical simulation methodologies, two methods were utilized to simulate Al/Fe bimetallic system which is of interest for the automotive industry. First, a Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) model of two impacting plates was created. Using SPH method, metal jet emission was investigated which previously was impossible. The results then were compared with an Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) method. Finally, the numerical results were compared with experimental tests using a Vaporizing Foil Actuator Welding process.

Keywords

Numerical modeling Welding Smoothed particle hydrodynamics Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Funding from the U.S. National Science Foundation (CMII-1537471) and Honda Motor Company are gratefully acknowledged. Many thanks to Genevieve Lee for helping to acquire SEM images.

References

  1. 1.
    Nassiri, A., Chini, G., Vivek, A., Daehn, G., & Kinsey, B. (2015). Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian finite element simulation and experimental investigation of wavy interfacial morphology during high velocity impact welding. Materials and Design, 88, 245–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nassiri, A., Chini, G., & Kinsey, B. (2014). Spatial stability analysis of emergent wavy interfacial patterns in magnetic pulsed welding. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 63(1), 245–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nassiri, A., Kinsey, B., & Chini, G. (2016). Shear instability of plastically-deforming metals in high-velocity impact welding. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 95, 351–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abrahamson, G. R. (1961). Permanent periodic surface deformations due to a traveling jet. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 28(4), 519–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bahrani, A. S., Black, T. J., & Crossland, B. (1967). The mechanics of wave formation in explosive welding. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 296(1445), 123–136.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cowan, G. R., Bergmann, O. R., & Holtzman, A. H. (1971). Mechanism of bond zone wave formation in explosion-clad metals. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 2(11), 3145–3155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    El-Sobky, H., & Blazynski, T. Z. (1975). Experimental investigation of the mechanics of explosive welding by means of a liquid analogue. In Proceeding of 5th International Conference on “High Energy Rate fabrication”, Denver, Colorado (pp. 1–21).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sapanathan, T., Raoelison, R. N., Padayodi, E., Buiron, N., & Rachik, M. (2016). Depiction of interfacial characteristic changes during impact welding using computational methods: Comparison between Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian and Eulerian simulations. Materials and Design, 102, 303–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Manikandan, P., Hokamoto, K., Deribas, A. A., Raghukandan, K., & Tomoshige, R. (2006). Explosive welding of titanium/stainless steel by controlling energetic conditions. Materials Transactions, 47(8), 2049–2055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Faes, K., Baaten, T., De Waele, W., & Debroux, N. (2010). Joining of Copper to Brass using magnetic pulse welding. In Proceedings of the 4th International conference on High Speed Forming, Columbus, OH (pp. 84–96).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kore, S. D., Imbert, J., Worswick, M. J., & Zhou, Y. (2009). Electromagnetic impact welding of Mg to Al sheets. Science and Technology of Welding and Joining, 14(6), 549–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vivek, A., Hansen, S. R., Liu, B. C., & Daehn, G. S. (2013). Vaporizing foil actuator: A tool for collision welding. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 213(12), 2304–2311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Raoelison, R. N., Sapanathan, T., Buiron, N., & Rachik, M. (2015). Magnetic pulse welding of Al/Al and Al/Cu metal pairs: Consequences of the dissimilar combination on the interfacial behavior during the welding process. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 20, 112–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sarrate, J., Huerta, A., & Donea, J. (2001). Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian formulation for fluid–rigid body interaction. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 190(24), 3171–3188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wen, Q., Guo, Y. B., & Todd, B. A. (2006). An adaptive FEA method to predict surface quality in hard machining. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 173(1), 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu, G. R., & Liu, M. B. (2003). Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: A meshfree particle method. Singapore: World Scientific publisher.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hayhurst, C. J., & Clegg, R. A. (1997). Cylindrically symmetric SPH simulations of hypervelocity impacts on thin plates. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 20(1), 337–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xu, X., Ouyang, J., Yang, B., & Liu, Z. (2013). SPH simulations of three-dimensional non-Newtonian free surface flows. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 256, 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nassiri, A., & Kinsey, B. (2016). Numerical studies on high-velocity impact welding: smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) and arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian (ALE). Journal of Manufacturing Processes.  10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.06.017
  20. 20.
    Smerd, R. (2005). Constitutive behavior of aluminum alloy sheet at high strain rates. Ph.D. dissertation, Waterloo, Canada.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Banerjee, A., Dhar, S., Acharyya, S., Datta, D., & Nayak, N. (2015). Determination of Johnson cook material and failure model constants and numerical modelling of Charpy impact test of armour steel. Materials Science and Engineering A, 640, 200–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rittel, D. (1999). On the conversion of plastic work to heat during high strain rate deformation of glassy polymers. Mechanics of Materials, 31(2), 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hallquist, J. O. (2006). LS-DYNA theory manual. Livermore: Livermore Software Technology Corporation.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Johnson, J. R., Taber, G., Vivek, A., Zhang, Y., Golowin, S., Banik, K., et al. (2009). Coupling experiment and simulation in electromagnetic forming using photon doppler velocimetry. Steel Research International, 80(5), 359–365.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nassiri, A. (2015). Investigation of wavy interfacial morphology in magnetic pulsed welding: Mathematical modeling, numerical simulations and experimental tests (p. 167). University of New Hampshire.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ali Nassiri
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Shunyi Zhang
    • 3
  • Tim Abke
    • 4
  • Anupam Vivek
    • 1
    • 2
  • Brad Kinsey
    • 3
  • Glenn Daehn
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for Design and Manufacturing Excellence (CDME)The Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  2. 2.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of New HampshireDurhamUSA
  4. 4.Honda R&D, North AmericaRaymondUSA

Personalised recommendations