Synthesis and Characterization of Ni0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4@mSiO2 Core Shell Nanocarrier for Drug Delivery Applications

  • Mohd Qasim
  • Khushnuma Asghar
  • Dibakar DasEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)


Ni0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4@mesoporousSiO2 (NZF@mSiO2) core shell nanocarrier was synthesized by sol–gel method using tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) and characterized for different physicochemical properties. The structural and morphological properties were studied by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscope (TEM), and field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) techniques. XRD pattern and TEM micrographs confirm the coexistence of Ni0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 and SiO2 phases in the nanocomposites. Average crystallite size of Ni0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 NPs was found to be around ~21 nm. Particles size of NZF@mSiO2 measured by TEM and FESEM are found to be ~200–400 nm. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) results confirm successful formation of NZF@mSiO2 core shell nanocomposites having well symmetric structure and ellipsoidal shape. HRTEM analysis confirmed the presence of pores (5–10 nm) on the surface of SiO2 nanosphere. Magnetic properties of NZF@mSiO2 nanocarriers were studied by vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) technique. NZF@mSiO2 nanocarriers were found to be super-paramagnetic in nature with negligible coercivity and remanent magnetization. The Ms value for NZF@mSiO2 was found to be 9.5 emu/gm.


Magnetic nanoparticles Targeted drug delivery Nanocarriers 



M. Qasim greatly acknowledges the financial support obtained from University Grants Commission (UGC) in the form of MANF fellowship in carrying out this research work (2012-13/MANF-2012-13-MUS-UTT-15733). The technical support received from the School of Engineering Sciences & Technology (SEST), Central Instruments laboratory (CIL) and Centre for Nanotechnology at the University of Hyderabad is greatly appreciated.


  1. 1.
    Qasim, M., Asghar, K., Singh, B. R., Prathapani, S., Khan, W., Naqvi, A. H., et al. (2015). Magnetically recyclable Ni0 . 5Zn0 . 5Fe2O4/Zn0 . 9 5Ni0 . 0 5O nano-photocatalyst: Structural, optical, magnetic and photocatalytic properties. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 137, 1348–1356.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Qasim, M., Singh, B. R., Naqvi, A. H., Paik, P., & Das, D. (2015). Silver nanoparticles embedded mesoporous SiO2 nanosphere: An effective anticandidal agent against Candida albicans 077. Nanotechnology, 26, 285102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mura, S., Nicolas, J., & Couvreur, P. (2013). Stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for drug delivery. Nature Materials, 12, 991–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tian, Y., Jiang, X., Chen, X., Shao, Z., & Yang, W. (2014). Doxorubicin‐loaded magnetic silk fibroin nanoparticles for targeted therapy of multidrug‐resistant cancer. Advanced Materials, 26(43), 7393–7398.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim, J., Kim, H. S., Lee, N., Kim, T., Kim, H., et al. (2008). Multifunctional uniform nanoparticles composed of a magnetite nano-crystal core and a mesoporous silica shell for magnetic resonance and Fluorescence Imaging and for Drug Delivery. Angewandte Chemie, 120, 8566–8569.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim, J., Lee, J. E., Lee, J., Yu, J. H., Kim, B. C., An, K., et al. (2006). Magnetic fluorescent delivery vehicle using uniform mesoporous silica spheres embedded with monodisperse magnetic and semiconductor nanocrystals. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 128(3), 688–689.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee, J. E., Lee, N., Kim, T., Kim, J., & Hyeon, T. (2011). Multifunctional mesoporous silica nanocomposite nanoparticles for theranostic applications. Accounts of Chemical Research, 44(10), 893–902.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen, W. H., Luo, G. F., Lei, Q., Cao, F. Y., Fan, J. X., Qiu, W. X., et al. (2016). Rational design of multifunctional magnetic mesoporous silica nanoparticle for tumor-targeted magnetic resonance imaging and precise therapy. Biomaterials, 76, 87–101.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alvarez-Berríos, M. P., Sosa-Cintron, N., Rodriguez-Lugo, M., Juneja, R., & Vivero-Escoto, J. L. (2016). Hybrid nanomaterials based on iron oxide nanoparticles and mesoporous silica nanoparticles: Overcoming challenges in current cancer treatments. Journal of Chemistry, 2016, 1–15.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sadiq Al-Qubaisi, M., et al. (2013). Cytotoxicity of nickel zinc ferrite nanoparticles on cancer cells of epithelial origin. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 8, 2497–2508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sadiq Al-Qubaisi, M., et al. (2013). Induction of apoptosis in cancer cells by NiZn ferrite nanoparticles through mitochondrial cytochrome C release. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 8, 4115–4130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khan, J. A., Qasim, M., Singh, B. R., Khan, W., Das, D., & Naqvi, A. H. (2014). Polyaniline/CoFe2O4 nanocomposite inhibits the growth of Candida albicans 077 by ROS production. Comptes Rendus Chimie, 17, 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Qasim, M., Ananthaiah, J., Dhara, S., Paik, P., & Das, D. (2014). Synthesis and characterization of ultra-fine colloidal silica nanoparticles. Advanced Science, Engineering and Medicine, 6, 965–973.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Engineering Sciences and TechnologyUniversity of HyderabadHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations