Effect of Forging on Microstructure, Texture and Compression Behavior of Extruded AZ31B

  • D. ToscanoEmail author
  • S. K. Shaha
  • B. Behravesh
  • H. Jahed
  • M. Wells
  • B. Williams
  • J. McKinley
Conference paper
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)


Forging is a common method employed in the fabrication of automotive components. In this study, extruded AZ31B magnesium alloy was semi-close die forged at a temperature of 500 °C with a ram rate of 40 mm/s. Microstructural study indicated a bimodal grain structure with weaker texture in the forged material compared to the as-extruded material. Uniaxial compression tests indicated a remarkable improvement of fracture strain from 36 to 61% with a reduction of ultimate compressive strength between 4 and 22% in the forged samples compared to the as-extruded samples. It is attributed to the modification of microstructure and texture decreases twinning and increases the slipping activity resulting the improvement of ductility and reduced strength at room temperature.


Forging Extrusion Microstructure Texture Compression 



The financial support of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) through the Automotive Partnership Canada (APC) program under APCPJ 459269–13 grant with contributions from Multimatic Technical Centre, Ford Motor Company, and Centerline Windsor are acknowledged. The authors would also like to thank L. Blaga of CanmetMATERIALS, Hamilton for forging trials and, G. Yu for design of the forging die and Dr. Y. Ding of the University of Waterloo for assistance with SEM and OM.


  1. 1.
    EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality. (2012). EPA and NHTSA set standards to reduce greenhouse gases and improve fuel economy for model years 2017–2025 cars and light trucks. Washington: United States Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kulekci, M. K. (2008). Magnesium and its alloys applications in automotive industry. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 851–865.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Huang, G., Han, T., Pan, F., Zhang, H., & Li, J. (2014). Improving low-cycle fatigue properties of rolled AZ31 magnesium alloys by pre-compression. Material & Design, 58, 439–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Albinmousa, J., Jahed, H., & Lambert, S. (2011). Cyclic behaviour of wrought magnesium alloy under mutliaxial loading. International Journal of Fatigue, 1403–1416.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Albinmousa, J., Jahed, H., & Lambert, S. (2011). Cyclic axial and cyclic torsional behaviour of extruded AZ31B magnesium alloy. International Journal of Fatigue, 33(8), 1127–1139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Martin, E., & Jonas, J. J. (2010). Evolution of microstructure and microtexture during the hot deformation of Mg–3% Al. Acta Materialia, 58(12), 4253–4266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gryguc, A., Jahed, H., Williams, B., & McKinley, J. (2015). MagForge—Mechanical behaviour of forged AZ31B extruded magnesium in monotonic compression. Materials Science Forum, 828–829, 291–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gryguc, A., Shaha, S., Jahed, H., Wells, M., Williams, B., & McKinley, J. (2016). Tensile and fatigue behaviour of as-forged AZ31B extrusion. Fracture and Structural Integrity, 38, 251–258.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sarker, D., Friedman, J., & Chen, D. L. (2015). De-twinning and texture change in an extruded AM30 magnesium alloy during compression along normal direction. Journal of Materials Science and Technology, 31(3), 264–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Roostaei, A. A., & Jahed, H. (2016). Role of loading direction on cyclic behaviour characteristics of AM30 extrusion and its fatigue damage modelling. Materials Science and Engineering A, 670, 26–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zheng, S., Yu, Q., & Jiang, Y. (2013). An experimental study of fatigue crack propagation in extruded AZ31B magnesium alloy. International Journal of Fatigue, 47, 174–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yang, X., Yi, J., Ni, S., Du, Y., & Song, M. (2016). Microstructural evolution and structure-hardness relationship in an Al-4wt.%Mg alloy processed by high-pressure torsion. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 25, 1909–1915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Choi, S. H., Shin, E. J., & Seong, B. S. (2007). Simulation of deformation twins and deformation texture in an AZ31 Mg alloy under uniaxial compression. Acta Materialia, 55(12), 4181–4192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Barnett, M. R., Keshavarz, Z., Beer, A. G., & Atwell, D. (2004). Influence of grain size on the compressive deformation of wrought Mg–3Al–1Zn. Acta Materialia, 52, 5093–5103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jahadi, R., Sedighi, M., & Jahed, H. (2014). ECAP effect on the microstructure and mechanical properties of AM30 magnesium alloy. Materials Science and Engineering A, 593, 178–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Koike, J., Kobayashi, T., Mukai, T., Watanabe, H., Suzuki, M., Maruyama, K., et al. (2003). The activity of non-basal slip systems and dynamic recovery at room temperature in fine-grained AZ31B magnesium alloys. Acta Materialia, 51(7), 2055–2065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Toscano
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. K. Shaha
    • 1
  • B. Behravesh
    • 1
  • H. Jahed
    • 1
  • M. Wells
    • 1
  • B. Williams
    • 2
  • J. McKinley
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics EngineeringUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada
  2. 2.CanmetMATERIALSNatural Resources CanadaHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations