Abstract
The effectiveness of the collective learning that takes place in modern housing developments can play a major role in terms of housing performance. Building performance evaluation (BPE) currently does not address the type and quality of collective learning processes happening within a community in relation to occupants using their new homes. A Social Learning Tool is proposed to extend BPE methodology and provide a framework to help researchers better understand the nature and degree of home user collective learning and community involvement which can in turn enhance the BPE process. A first partial application of the tool to six case study dwellings within a low carbon development in Leeds allowed identification of barriers and opportunities for collective learning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
‘Zero Energy’ as proposed in article 2 of EU Directive 2010/31/EU (EPBD recast) that is including energy in use but not including embodied energy or complete energy lifecycle of construction and home components.
References
Mohamed, A., Hasan, A., Siren, K.: Fulfillment of net-zero energy building (NZEB) with four metrics in a single family house with different heating alternatives. Appl. Energy 114, 385–399 (2014)
Stefanovic, A., Bojic, M., Gordic, D.: Achieving net zero energy cost house from old thermally non-insulated house using photovoltaic panels. Energy Build. 76, 57–63 (2014)
Szejnwald Brown, H., Vergragt, P.: Bounded socio-technical experiments as agents of systemic change: The case of a zero-energy residential building. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 75, 107–130 (2008)
Yua, Z., Fungb, B., Haghighata, F., Yoshinoc, H., Morofsky, E.: A systematic procedure to study the influence of occupant behavior on building energy consumption. Energy Build. 43(6), 1409–1417 (2011)
Gill, Z., Tierney, M., Pegg, I., Allan, N.: Low-energy dwellings: The contribution of behaviours to actual performance. Build. Res. Inf. 38(5), 491–508 (2010)
Gram-Hanssen, K.: Efficient technologies or user behaviour, which is the more important when reducing households’ energy consumption? Energ. Effi. 6, 447–457 (2013)
Janda, K.: Buildings don’t use energy: People do. Architectural Sci. Rev. 54, 15–22 (2011)
Her Majesty’s Governement: National Strategy for Climate and Energy. The Stationary Office, Norwich (2009)
Stern, P.: Individual and household interaction with energy systems: Toward integrated understanding. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 1, 41–48 (2014)
Gram-Hanssen, K.: Residential heat comfort practices. Build. Res. Inf. 38(2), 175–186 (2010)
Gill, Z., Tierney, M., Pegg, I., Allan, N.: Measured energy and water performance of an aspiring low energy/carbon affordable housing site in the UK. Ener. Build. 43, 117–125 (2011)
Rohracher, H., Ornetzeder, M.: Green buildings in context: Improving Social Learning processes between users and producers. Built Environ. 28(1), 73–85 (2002)
Day, J., Gunderson, D.: Understanding high performance buildings: The link between occupant knowledge of passive design systems, corresponding behaviours, occupant comfort and environmental satistafaction. Build. Environ. 84, 114–124 (2014)
Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behaviour. In: Van Lange, P., Kruglanski, A., Higgins, E. (eds.) The Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, vol. 1, pp. 438–460. Sage, London (2011)
Chatterton, P.: Towards an agenda for post-carbon cities: Lessons from LILAC, the UK’s first ecological, affordable, cohousing community. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. ISSN 0309-1317 (2013)
Leaman, A., Stevenson, F., Bordass, B.: Building evaluation. Build. Res. Inf. 38(5), 564–577 (2010)
Mallory Hill, S., Preiser, W.F.E., Watson, C.: Enhancing Building Performance. Wiley Blackwell, Oxford (2012)
Way, M., Bordass, B.: Making feedback and post-occupancy evaluation routine 2: Soft Landings—involving design and building teams in improving performance. Build. Res. Inf. 33(4), 353–360 (2005)
Glad, W.: Housing renovation and energy systems. Build. Res. Inf. 40(3), 274–289 (2012)
Berry, S.: Inspiring low-energy retrofits: The influence of ‘open home’ events. Build. Res. Inf. 42(4), 422–433 (2014)
Gupta, R., Barnfield, L., Hipwood, T.: Impacts of community-led energy retrofitting of owner-occupied dwellings. Build. Res. Inf. 42(4), 446–461 (2014)
Gertler, M.: Technology, culture and social learning: Regional and national institutions of governance. In: Gertler, M., Wolfe, D. (eds.) Innovation and Social Learning, pp. 111–135. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2002)
Carmona-Andreu, I., Stevenson, F., Hancock, M.: Low carbon housing: Understanding occupant guidance and training. In: Hakansson, A., Hojer M., Howlett, R., Jain, L. (eds.) Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies. Sustainability in Energy and Buildings. Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Sustainability in Energy and Buildings. pp. 545–554. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Norman, D.: The Design of Everyday Things. MIT Press, London (1998)
Badura, A.: Social Learning Theory. Prentice-Hall, New York (1977)
Sørensen, K.H.: Learning Technology, Constructing Culture: Socio-technical Change as Social Learning. STS Working Paper No. 18/96, Centre for Technology and Society, University of Trondheim, Trondheim (1996)
Mallory-Hill et al. (eds.).: Enhancing Building Performance. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester (2012)
Biggs, R., Schlüter, M., Biggs, D., Bohensky, E.L., Burn Silver, S., Cundill, G. et al.: Toward principles for enhancing the resilience of ecosystem services. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 37, 421–448 (2012)
Yin, R.K.: Case study Research: Design and Method, 2nd edn. Sage, London (2009)
Chatteton, P.: Low Impact Living—A Field Guide to Ecological Affordable Community Building. Earthscan, Oxon (2015)
Wall, K., Walker, P., Gross, C., White, C., Mander, T.: Development and testing of a prototype straw bale house. Proc. Inst. Civil Eng. Constr. Mater. 165(6), 377–384 (2012)
Baborska-Narozny, M., Stevenson, F.: Performance evaluation of residential architecture. In: Chartonowicz, J. (ed.) Advances in human Factors and Sustainable Infrastructure. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics. pp. 109–118. AHFE, Krakow (2014)
Stevenson, F., Carmona-Andreu, I., Hancock, M.: The usability of control interfaces in low-carbon housing. Architectural Sci. Rev. 56(1), 70–82 (2013)
Cohen, R., Standeven, M., Bordass, B., Leaman, A.: Assessing building performance in use 1. Build. Res. Inf. 29(2), 85–102 (2001)
Chiu, L.F., Lowe, R., Raslan, R., Altamirano-Medina, H., Wingfield, J.: A socio-technical approach to post-occupancy evaluation: Interactive adaptability in domestic retrofit. Build. Res. Inf. 42(5), 574–590 (2014)
Chatterton, P.: Interviewed by Modcell. http://www.modcell.com/news/modcell-cuts-energy-bills-90/
BioRegional.: What makes an eco-town? CABE (2008). http://www.bioregional.com
Galvin, R.: Why German homeowners are reluctant to retrofit. Build. Res. Inf. 42(4), 398–408 (2014)
Balvers, B., Bogers, R., Jongeneel, R., Kamp, I.: Mechanical ventilation in recently built Dutch homes: Technical shortcomings, possibilities for improvement, perceived indoor environment and health effects. Architectural Sci. Rev. 55(1), 4–14 (2012)
Stevenson, F., Fewson, K., Johnson, D., Yeats, A.: Lancaster Co-housing project part 8: Post-occupation building performance evaluation. Green Build. 23(1), 24–35 (2013)
Brown, C., Gorgolewski, M.: Understanding the role of inhabitants in innovative mechanical ventilation strategies. Build. Res. Inf. 43(2), 210–221 (2015)
UK Building Regulations: Approved Document Part F, Ventilation. Crown Copyright, London (2010)
Vent-Axia.: Heat recovery ventialtion—home owners ventilation system guide. http://www.vent-axia.com/files/pdf- downloads/Sentinel_Kinetic_User_Guide_402270.pdf
Stevenson, F., Baborska-Narozny, M.: Designing resilient housing for co-evolutionary adaptivity. In: Nicol, F., Roaf, S., Brotas, L., Humphreys, M. (eds.) Proceedings of 8th Windsor Conference: Counting the Cost of Comfort in a Changing World, pp. 436–445. NCEUB, Windsor (2014)
Seyfang, G., Park, J., Smith, A.: A thousand flowers blooming? An examination of community energy in the UK. Energy Policy 61, 977–989 (2013)
Ancona, D.: Sensemaking: Framing and acting in the unknown. In: Snook, S., Nohira, N., Khurana, N. (eds.) The Handbok for Teaching Leadership, pp. 3–21. Sage, London (2012)
Wenger, E.: Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. University Press Cambridge, Cambridge (1998)
Gann, D.: Trading places-sharing knowledge about environmental building techniques. In: Cole, R., Lorch, R. (eds.) Buildings, Culture and Environment, pp. 37–57. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford (2003)
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the funding provided for research informing this study by the EU FP7 Marie Curie Intra European Fellowship programme through the BuPESA project, as well as the generous time given by the occupants involved in these case studies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Baborska-Narozny, M., Stevenson, F., Chatterton, P. (2017). Understanding Opportunities and Barriers for Social Occupant Learning in Low Carbon Housing. In: Littlewood, J., Spataru, C., Howlett, R., Jain, L. (eds) Smart Energy Control Systems for Sustainable Buildings. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 67. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52076-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52076-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52074-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52076-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)