Abstract
Taiwan, like many Asian nations, has been an active promoter of EMI as part of a drive to internationalize its higher education sector. The push to implement EMI at a quick pace creates a need for teacher support, as lecturers adapt their courses to the new medium of instruction. This situation presents an opportunity for Anglophone nations to provide EMI teacher training within a fully immersive environment. This chapter provides an analysis of the current state of EMI in Taiwan and the place of the lecturer within it, as well as common solutions and professional development responses to the challenges posed by EMI. The chapter then examines the case of a professional development program for Taiwanese university lecturers at an American university, examining the preparatory work undertaken to ascertain the participants’ views on EMI as a policy (both institutional and national) and practice in the context of Taiwanese higher education, and to understand their perceived needs in relation to short-term training in an overseas Anglophone locale.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Airey, J. (2016). EAP, EMI, or CLIL? In K. Hyland & P. Shaw (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes (pp. 71–83). New York: Routledge.
Ball, P., & Lindsay, D. (2013). Language demands and support for English-medium instruction in tertiary education. Learning from a specific context. In A. Doiz, D. Lasagabaster, & J. M. Sierra (Eds.), English-medium instruction at universities: Global challenges (pp. 44–61). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Chan, S.-J. (2013). Internationalising higher education sectors: Explaining the approaches in four Asian countries. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(3), 316–329.
Chang, Y.-Y. (2010). English-medium instruction for subject courses in tertiary education: Reactions from Taiwanese undergraduate students. Taiwan International ESP Journal, 2(1), 55–84.
Chen, I. W.-L., & Hsieh, J.-C. (2011). English language in Taiwan: An examination of its use in society and education in schools. In A. Feng (Ed.), English language education across greater China (pp. 70–94). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Dearden, J. (2014). English as a medium of instruction: A growing global phenomenon. London: British Council. http://www.britishcouncil.org/education/ihe/knowledge-centre/english-language-higher-education/report-english-medium-instruction. Accessed August 19, 2015.
EMI Courses for Teachers and Lecturers. (2015). http://www.education.ox.ac.uk/crdemi-oxford/emi-courses-for-teachers-and-university-lecturers/. Accessed July 31, 2016.
Guinda, C. S. (2013). Teacher targets: A model for CLIL and ELF teacher education in polytechnic settings. Language Value, 5(1), 76–106.
Hino, N. (2017). The significance of EMI for the learning of EIL in higher education: Four cases from Japan. In B. Fenton-Smith, P. Humphreys, & I. Walkinshaw (Eds.), English medium instruction in higher education in Asia-Pacific: From policy to pedagogy. Dordrecht: Springer.
Hou, A. Y. C., Morse, R., Chiang, C.-L., & Chen, H.-J. (2013). Challenges to quality of English medium instruction degree programs in Taiwanese universities and role of local accreditors: A perspective of non-English-speaking Asian country. Asia Pacific Education Review, 14, 359–370.
Huang, Y.-P. (2012). Design and implementation of English-medium courses in higher education in Taiwan: A qualitative case study. English Teaching and Learning, 36(1), 1–51.
Huang, D.-F. (2015). Exploring and assessing effectiveness of English-medium instruction courses: The students’ perspectives. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 173, 71–78.
Huang, D.-F., & Singh, M. (2014). Critical perspectives on testing teaching: Reframing teacher education for English medium instruction. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4), 363–378.
Kim, E. G. (2017). English-medium instruction in Korean higher education: Challenges and future directions. In B. Fenton-Smith, P. Humphreys, & I. Walkinshaw (Eds.), English as a medium of instruction in higher education in Asia-Pacific: From policy to pedagogy. Dordrecht: Springer.
Klaassen, R. G. (2008). Preparing lecturers for English-medium instruction. In R. Wilkinson & V. Zegers (Eds.), Realizing content and language integration in higher education (pp. 32–42). Maastricht: Maastricht University.
Klaassen, R. G., & de Graaff, E. (2001). Facing innovation: Preparing lecturers for English-medium instruction in a non-native context. European Journal of Engineering Education, 26(3), 281–289.
Ma, A.-H. S. (2014). The development of international student recruitment policies in Taiwan: A 60-year trajectory. Journal of Studies in International Education, 18(2), 120–140.
Ministry of Education. (2014). Education in Taiwan. Taipei: MOE. http://english.moe.gov.tw/public/Attachment/410214334871.pdf. Accessed August 02, 2015.
Nguyen, T. H., Walkinshaw, I., & Pham, H. H. (2017). EMI programs in a Vietnamese university: Language, pedagogy and policy issues. In B. Fenton-Smith, P. Humphreys, & I. Walkinshaw (Eds.), English medium instruction in higher education in Asia-Pacific: From policy to pedagogy. Dordrecht: Springer.
Saldaña, J. (2012). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage.
Tsai, Y.-R., & Tsou, W. (2015). Accommodation strategies employed by non-native English-mediated instruction (EMI) teachers. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(2), 399–407.
Trent, J. (2017). “Being a professor and doing EMI properly isn’t easy”. An identity-theoretic investigation of content teachers’ attitudes towards EMI at a university in Hong Kong. In B. Fenton-Smith, P. Humphreys, & I. Walkinshaw (Eds.), English medium instruction in higher education in Asia-Pacific: From policy to pedagogy. Dordrecht: Springer.
Wu, W.-S. (2006). Students’ attitudes toward EMI: Using Chung Hua University as an example. Journal of Education and Foreign Language and Literature, 4, 67–84.
Yeh, C.-C. (2014). Taiwanese students’ experiences and attitudes towards English-medium courses in tertiary education. RELC Journal, 45(3), 305–319.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: EMI Survey Instrument
Appendix: EMI Survey Instrument
Q1 What is your name? (Family name, Given name): ———
Q2 (Choose all that apply.) What type of teacher roles do you fill?
-
a.
Content area instructor (e.g., “I teach (science/marketing/etc.) classes”)
-
b.
Program Administrator
-
c.
Public Service Officer (Government staff, etc.)
-
d.
Teacher educator
-
e.
Other (please specify)
Q3 Please choose the best response to describe your experience as a teacher using EMI:
-
a.
I have never used English in my lectures or class assignments
-
b.
I have used EMI only a little bit in my classes, and I have never taught a class entirely using EMI
-
c.
I have used EMI a fair bit in several classes, and/or I have taught a course entirely using EMI
-
d.
I have used EMI a lot in many classes and/or I have taught several courses entirely using EMI
Comment (optional):
Q4 EMI for my classes is:
-
a.
required by my institution.
-
b.
likely to be required by my institution in the future.
-
c.
not likely to be required by my institution in the future.
-
d.
Other (please specify):
Comment (optional):
Q5 Why might EMI be a good thing for your institution to use?
Q6 How strongly would you rate your personal support for EMI in your institution?
-
a.
strongly against
-
b.
against
-
c.
neutral
-
d.
in favor
-
e.
strongly in favor
Comment (optional):
Q7 How would you rate your confidence in conducting EMI at your institution?
-
a.
not confident at all
-
b.
somewhat confident
-
c.
very confident
Comment (optional):
Q8 How often do you currently use English in the classes that you teach?
-
a.
never
-
b.
sometimes
-
c.
often
-
d.
always
Comment (optional):
Q9 Please briefly explain which teaching activities you currently conduct in English, if any.
Q10 What areas of EMI would you like to develop while in the UCI English Mediated Instruction Teacher Training Program?
Q11 In your opinion, what do you think is most challenging about EMI?
Q12 (Choose all that apply.) At the UCI English Mediated Instruction Teacher Training Program, I hope to:
-
a.
have opportunities to practice teaching
-
b.
receive help with my lessons
-
c.
improve my English skills
-
d.
learn about American culture
-
e.
go sightseeing
-
f.
forge relationships with American professionals in my content area (e.g., business, science)
-
g.
learn from my peers
-
h.
learn from experts
-
i.
interact with Americans in informal settings
-
j.
Other (please comment):
Q13 (Choose all that apply.) As a teacher in the classroom I usually:
-
a.
lecture
-
b.
ask questions
-
c.
take questions from students
-
d.
lead discussions
-
e.
have students talk in pairs or small groups
-
f.
assign student presentations
-
g.
Other (Please comment)
Q14 In the classes that I teach, the students’ reading material is:
-
a.
all in English
-
b.
all in Chinese
-
c.
some is in Chinese, but most is in English
-
d.
some is in English, but most is in Chinese
-
e.
Other (Please comment)
Q15 How often do your students ask questions during lectures?
-
a.
never
-
b.
sometimes
-
c.
often
-
d.
always
Comment (optional):
Q16 How often do your students need to take notes during your classes?
-
a.
never
-
b.
sometimes
-
c.
often
-
d.
always
Comment (optional):
Q17 How well do your students take notes during your classes?
-
a.
not well
-
b.
okay
-
c.
very well
-
d.
I don’t know
Comment (optional):
Q18 (Choose all that apply.) What kind of information do you provide on handouts?
-
a.
I don’t provide handouts
-
b.
An outline of the lecture
-
c.
Discussion questions
-
d.
Lecture notes with gaps for students to fill in
-
e.
Other (Please comment):
Q19 (Choose all that apply) What technology do you normally use for your lectures?
-
a.
projector
-
b.
presentation slides
-
c.
printed handouts
-
d.
whiteboard/chalkboard
-
e.
video
-
f.
polling clickers (e.g., e-clickers, etc.)
-
g.
Other (Please comment)
Q20 On average, how many students do you have in a typical course?
-
a.
2–20
-
b.
21–50
-
c.
51–100
-
d.
over 100
-
e.
Other (Please comment)
Q21 (Choose all that apply.) What are your biggest concerns about using EMI?
-
a.
students have low level English language ability
-
b.
students have mixed English language ability (i.e., students have different levels of English ability; some may have adequate skills while others do not)
-
c.
insufficient support for students to develop their English language abilities at my institution
-
d.
my own limited English language ability
-
e.
EMI may diminish the quality of the content I try to teach
-
f.
Other (Please comment)
Q22 (Please think about your own prior experience as a student, and choose all that apply.) As a student, I have
-
a.
never taken a class that was mostly taught in English
-
b.
taken ESL/EFL classes (i.e., classes on how to speak English) that were mostly taught in English
-
c.
taken classes on other subjects (e.g., science, business) that were mostly taught in English
Comment (optional):
Q23 If you have taken any classes as a student where the content was communicated in English, what practices helped you to understand and/or made the classes effective for you?
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fenton-Smith, B., Stillwell, C., Dupuy, R. (2017). Professional Development for EMI: Exploring Taiwanese Lecturers’ Needs. In: Fenton-Smith, B., Humphreys, P., Walkinshaw, I. (eds) English Medium Instruction in Higher Education in Asia-Pacific. Multilingual Education, vol 21. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51976-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51976-0_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51974-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51976-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)