Abstract
It is becoming increasingly apparent that a harmonious junction between Hans Kelsen’s works and modern theories of human rights is highly unlikely. First, Hans Kelsen rejects natural law as the basis of law and, a fortiori, of human rights, while natural law has been at the heart of Bills and Declarations of rights and freedoms since the seventeenth-century. Next, Kelsen also denies the existence of any links between law and morality and refutes the existence of a system of values. Furthermore, he excludes, from the scope of constitutional review, statements expressing principles of justice or general freedom because their vagueness and abstractness would immediately lead to arbitrariness in adjudication. Finally, the Kelsenian definition of the concept of democracy is purely procedural; namely, there is no reference to the substantive aspects of democratic principles and values. Despite these unpromising starting points, it would be improper to conclude that Kelsen ignores or slights human rights. It is not so difficult to restore links between the modern and contemporary theories of human rights and Kelsen’s work, through a consideration of his meta-ethical preferences and the global structure of his ideas.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The further, extended reflection upon this is undertaken by Bobbio in (Bobbio 1990/1991).
References
Barberis, M. 2011. El neoconstitucionalismo, Third Theory of Law. In Neoconstitucionalismo, Derecho y derechos, edited by S. Pozzolo, 251–275. Lima: Palestra editores.
Bobbio, N. 1989. Il terzo assente. Milan: Edizioni Sonda.
Bobbio N. 1990. L’Età dei diritti. Turin: Einaudi (English translation: Bobbio, N. 1991. The Age of Human Rights. Cambridge: Polity Press).
Champeil-Desplats, V. 2012. La théorie générale de l’Etat est aussi une théorie des libertés fonda- mentales. Jus Politicum 8. http://juspoliticum.com/La-theorie-generale-de-l-Etat-est.html.
Comanducci, P., M.A. Ahumada, and D.G. Lagier. 2009. Positivismo jurídico y neoconstitution-alismo. Madrid: Fundación coloquio jurídico europeo.
Dworkin, R. 1996. Freedom’s Law. The moral reading of the American constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Guastini, R. 1986. Théorie et ontologie du droit chez Dworkin. Droit et Société 2: 15–22.
———. 1991. Réflexion sur les garanties des droits constitutionnels et la théorie de l’interprétation. RDP: 1079–1090.
Haldemann, F. 2005. Gustav Radbruch vs. Hans Kelsen: A Debate on Nazi Law. Ratio Juris 18 (2): 162–178.
Kelsen Hans. 1929. Essence and Value of Democracy. reprinted. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2013.
———. 1928. La garantie juridictionnelle de la Constitution (La Justice constitutionnelle). Revue de droit public 35: 197–257.
———. 1931. Wer soll der Hüter der Verfassung sein? (French translation: Qui doit être le gardien de la constitution? Paris: Michel Houdiard, 2006).
———. 1944. Peace through Law. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
———. 1945. General theory of Law and State. New Jersey: The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd..
———. 1957. What is Justice? Berkeley: University of California Press.
———. 1967. Pure Theory of Law. Trans. Max Knight. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967, reprinted: Lawbook Exchange, Ltd., 2005. (German original 1960).
Peces-Barba, G. 2004. Théorie générale des droits fondamentaux. Paris: LGDJ.
Pozzolo, S. 2001. Neocostituzionalismo e positivismo giuridico. Turin: Giappichelli editore.
Ramos Pascua, J.A. 2007. Positivismo jurídico y derechos humanos. In Jurisdicción, interpre- tación y sistema jurídico, edited by Pérez Bermejo, Juan Manuel, and M.A. Rodilla, 111–136. Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad Salamanca.
Sager, L.G. 2004. Justice in Plainclothes. A Theory of American Constitutional Practice. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Troper, M. 2007. Le positivisme et les droits de l’Homme. In Bentham contre les droits de l’Homme, edited by B. Binoche and J.-P. Cléro, 231–248. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Champeil-Desplats, V. (2017). Hans Kelsen’s Works and the Modern Theories of Human Rights. In: Langford, P., Bryan, I., McGarry, J. (eds) Kelsenian Legal Science and the Nature of Law. Law and Philosophy Library, vol 118. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51817-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51817-6_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51816-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51817-6
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)