Skip to main content

Bateson and the Doctors: The Introduction of Mendelian Genetics to the British Medical Community 1900–1910

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
History of Human Genetics

Abstract

William Bateson of Cambridge was the leading proponent of Mendelian genetics in England after 1900. His studies demonstrated segregation of inherited characters in both animal and plant species. Bateson was also asked to evaluate pedigrees of families collected by physicians in which various diseases appeared to be transmitted from one generation to the next. Bateson and Archibald Garrod collaborated on the analysis of alkaptonuria, a rare disorder of metabolism, often found in individuals who had first-cousin parents. This was consistent with recessive inheritance. Other metabolic disorders such as albinism, cystinuria, and pentosuria also followed the Mendelian recessive pattern for inheritance. However, Bateson found that other human diseases did not exhibit such clear examples of Mendelian inheritance. The ophthalmologist Edward Nettleship sent him detailed pedigrees from families with a host of inherited eye diseases. Stationary night blindness, glaucoma, and cataract were dominant. Retinitis pigmentosa demonstrated two forms of inheritance. In certain families, a dominant pattern was evident, while in other examples, a recessive inheritance pattern was observed. Alfred Gossage also sent Bateson family histories of heterochroma irides, exostoses, myotonia congenita, cleidocranial dysostosis, and tylosis palmaris et plantaris; all demonstrated dominant inheritance. George Mudge of the London Hospital Medical College worked with Bateson on the heredity of eye color and then organized a course for the students at his college on inheritance in clinical practice. The two also collaborated to establish The Mendel Journal in October 1908 to publicize the importance of Mendel’s laws for the understanding of inheritance in all living species. The Scottish physician Harry Drinkwater sent Bateson pedigrees with asthma and brachydactyly; all were consistent with the segregation of dominant traits. Redcliffe Salaman collected data from Jewish families with a rare neurologic disorder amaurotic family idiocy (Tay–Sachs disease). The reappearance of the character in an inbred population was consistent with a recessive segregation pattern. The Royal Society of Medicine sponsored a conference titled “Heredity and Disease” in November 1908. Bateson acknowledged the assistance of his medical colleagues in collecting well-documented pedigrees that indeed illustrated the Mendelian segregation of many human characters. He noted chorea, ectopia lentis, distichiasis, ptosis, and brachydactyly as examples of dominant traits. Albinism and alkaptonuria were often evident in consanguineous families as expected for recessive disorders. Hemophilia, muscular dystrophy, and color blindness followed the unusual pattern of affected males with unaffected female carriers that fit the pattern for sex-limited segregation. By the end of the first decade of the twentieth century, Bateson and his medical colleagues had successfully communicated in understandable terms the important role for Mendelian heredity in providing workable solutions to the riddle of human heredity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Lawford 1922, ix–xv.

  2. 2.

    P 330: Herringham to Nettleship, 1904.

  3. 3.

    Bateson 1894, 514.

  4. 4.

    Bateson B 1928.

  5. 5.

    Olby 1987.

  6. 6.

    Darden 1977.

  7. 7.

    Dunn 1991, 64–65.

  8. 8.

    Bateson 1902.

  9. 9.

    Bearn 1993, 59–61: Garrod to Bateson, 1902.

  10. 10.

    Bearn 1993, 42.

  11. 11.

    Garrod 1902.

  12. 12.

    Garrod 1908.

  13. 13.

    P 329: Bateson to Nettleship, 1905.

  14. 14.

    B 2663: Nettleship to Bateson, 1904.

  15. 15.

    B 2664: Nettleship to Bateson, 1905.

  16. 16.

    P 329: Bateson to Nettleship, 1907.

  17. 17.

    P 329: Bateson to Nettleship, 1906a.

  18. 18.

    B 2800: Turner to Bateson.

  19. 19.

    Turner 1906.

  20. 20.

    P 329: Bateson to Nettleship, 1906b.

  21. 21.

    B 329: Bateson to Nettleship, 1906c.

  22. 22.

    B 2674: Nettleship to Bateson, 1906b.

  23. 23.

    Nettleship 1907.

  24. 24.

    B 2689: Nettleship to Bateson, 1907.

  25. 25.

    Nettleship 1909.

  26. 26.

    Bearn 1993, 73.

  27. 27.

    Bateson 1906a.

  28. 28.

    Bateson 1906b.

  29. 29.

    B 2668: Nettleship to Bateson, 1906a.

  30. 30.

    B 2765: Gossage to Bateson 1910a.

  31. 31.

    B 2766: Gossage to Bateson, 1910b.

  32. 32.

    B 2765: Gossage to Bateson 1910a.

  33. 33.

    B 2766: Gossage to Bateson, 1910b.

  34. 34.

    B 2767: Gossage to Bateson, 1910c.

  35. 35.

    Mudge 1907.

  36. 36.

    B 1099: Mudge to Bateson, 1908.

  37. 37.

    Kim 1994.

  38. 38.

    Mudge 1909.

  39. 39.

    B 2783: Drinkwater to Bateson, 1907a.

  40. 40.

    B 2784: Drinkwater to Bateson, 1907b.

  41. 41.

    Drinkwater 1908.

  42. 42.

    B 2758: Drinkwater to Bateson, 1908.

  43. 43.

    Drinkwater 1909, 88.

  44. 44.

    Drinkwater, 1910.

  45. 45.

    Salaman 1910/11a.

  46. 46.

    Salaman 1910/11b.

  47. 47.

    Harman 1908/09.

  48. 48.

    B 673: Mudge to Bateson, 1908.

  49. 49.

    Bateson 1908/09.

  50. 50.

    Mudge 1908/09.

  51. 51.

    Gossage 1908/09.

  52. 52.

    Bateson 1909.

  53. 53.

    Leslie 1881.

  54. 54.

    Ribot 1875.

References

Archival Sources

  • Coleman Collection at the American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • B 0673: Mudge, George P.: Letter to William Bateson 3 December 1908.

    Google Scholar 

  • B 1099: Mudge, George P.: Letter to William Bateson 13 January 1908.

    Google Scholar 

  • John Innes Archives courtesy of the John Innes Foundation, Norwich, England

    Google Scholar 

  • B 2663: Nettleship; Edward: Letter to William Bateson 12 December 1904.

    Google Scholar 

  • B 2664: Nettleship, Edward: Letter to William Bateson 1 December 1905.

    Google Scholar 

  • B 2668: Nettleship, Edward: Letter to William Bateson 10 February 1906.

    Google Scholar 

  • B 2674: Nettleship, Edward: Letter to William Bateson 24 April 1906b.

    Google Scholar 

  • B 2689: Nettleship, Edward: Letter to William Bateson 22 December 1907.

    Google Scholar 

  • B 2758: Drinkwater, Harry: Letter to William Bateson 7 October 1908.

    Google Scholar 

  • B 2765: Gossage, Alfred: Letter to William Bateson 10 January 1910a.

    Google Scholar 

  • B 2766: Gossage, Alfred: Letter to William Bateson 11 April 1910b.

    Google Scholar 

  • B 2767: Gossage, Alfred: Letter to William Bateson 20 November 1910c.

    Google Scholar 

  • B 2783: Drinkwater, Harry: Letter to William Bateson 26 June 1907a.

    Google Scholar 

  • B 2784: Drinkwater, Harry: Letter to William Bateson 13 December 1907b.

    Google Scholar 

  • B 2800: Turner, J.G.: Letter to William Bateson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson Archive, Special Collections Library, University College London

    Google Scholar 

  • P 329: Bateson, William: Letter to Edward Nettleship 15 July 1905.

    Google Scholar 

  • P 329: Bateson, William: Letter to Edward Nettleship 1 February 1906a.

    Google Scholar 

  • P 329: Bateson, William: Letter to Edward Nettleship 13 April 1906b.

    Google Scholar 

  • P 329: Bateson, William: Letter to Edward Nettleship 13 October 1906c.

    Google Scholar 

  • P 329: Bateson, William: Letter to Edward Nettleship 7 January 1907.

    Google Scholar 

  • P 330: Herringham, W.P.: Letter to Edward Nettleship 28 November 1904.

    Google Scholar 

Literature

  • Bateson, Beatrice (1928): William Bateson, F.R.S. Naturalist: His Essays and Addresses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, William (1894): Materials for the Study of Variation. Reprint 1992. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, William (1902): The facts of heredity in light of Mendel’s discovery. Report to the Evolution Committee of the Royal Society 1: 125–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, William (1906a): An address on Mendelian heredity and its application to man. Brain 29: 157–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, William (1906b): An address on Mendelian heredity and its application to man. British Medical Journal 2: 61–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, William (1908/09): Heredity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 2: 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, William (1909): Mendel’s Principles of Heredity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bearn, Alexander G. (1993): Archibald Garrod and the Individuality of Man. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darden, Lindley (1977): William Bateson and the promise of Mendelism. Journal of the History of Biology 10: 87–106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drinkwater, Harry (1908): An account of a brachydactylous family. Liverpool Medico-Chirurgical Journal 28: 408–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drinkwater, Harry (1909): Mendelian heredity in asthma. British Medical Journal 1: 88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drinkwater, Harry (1910): A Lecture on Mendelism. London: J.M. Dent.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. C. (1991): A Short History of Genetics. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrod, Archibald E. (1902): The incidence of alkaptonuria. Lancet 2: 1616–1620.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garrod, Archibald E. (1908): Inborn errors of metabolism. Lancet 2: 1–7, 73–79, 142–48, 214–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gossage, Alfred M. (1908a): The inheritance of certain human abnormalities. Quarterly Journal of Medicine 1: 331–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gossage, Alfred (1908b/09): Discussion. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 2: 86–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gossage, Alfred M., E. R. Carling (1910/11): Multiple cartilaginous exostoses. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 4: 1–22 (Medicine).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, N. Bishop (1908/09): Discussion. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 2: 135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, Peter S. (2008): A Short History of Medical Genetics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Kyung-Man (1994): Explaining Scientific Consensus—The Case of Mendelian Genetics. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawford, J.B. (1922): Memoir of Edward Nettleship. Treasury of Human Inheritance 2: ix-xv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, George (1881): On hereditary transmission of disease: Method of graphic representation. Edinburgh Medical Journal 27: 795–799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudge, George P. (1907): The interpretation of Mendelian phenomena. Nature 77: 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudge, George P. (1908/09): Discussion. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 2: 108–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudge, George P. (1909): Mendelian inheritance and human society. Mendel Journal 1: 44–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettleship, Edward (1907): A history of congenital stationary night-blindness in nine consecutive generations. Transactions of the Ophthalmologic Society of the United Kingdom 27: 269–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettleship, Edward (1909): On some hereditary diseases of the eye. The Bowman Lecture. Transactions of the Ophthalmologic Society of the United Kingdom 29: i-cxcviii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olby, Robert C. (1987): William Bateson’s introduction of Mendelism to England: A reassessment. British Journal for the History of Science 30: 399–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribot, Theodule-Armand (1875): Heredity. New York: Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushton, Alan R. (2009): Genetics and Medicine in Great Britain 1600 to 1939. Vancouver, British Columbia: Trafford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salaman, Redcliffe N. (1910a/11a): The inheritance of colour and other characters in the potato. Journal of Genetics 1: 15–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salaman, Redcliffe N. (1910b/11b): Heredity and the Jew. Journal of Genetics 1: 273–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J.G. (1906): Hereditary hypoplasia of enamel. Transactions of the Odontological Society of Great Britain 39:137–155.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan R. Rushton Ph.D., M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rushton, A.R. (2017). Bateson and the Doctors: The Introduction of Mendelian Genetics to the British Medical Community 1900–1910. In: Petermann, H., Harper, P., Doetz, S. (eds) History of Human Genetics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51783-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics