Forensic Narration

Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies book series (PMMS)

Abstract

Bøndergaard presents a definition of a “forensic” mode in literature in relation to Astrid Erll’s memory modes, arguing that the forensic narrative mode is reflexive but also oriented towards the conflictual nature of history. Bøndergaard proposes Chantal Mouffe’s concept of agonism to describe this political aspect of the mode of remembering elicited by these narratives. Through analyses of Javier Cercas’ The Anatomy of a Moment and Joseph O’Neill’s Blood-Dark Track, Bøndergaard discusses central features of the forensic mode. The analysis of The Anatomy of a Moment, which investigates the Spanish transition to democracy after Francoism, focuses on claim-making and the forum of forensic narratives, while the analysis of Joseph O’Neill’s Blood-Dark Track considers the role of the narrator as investigator and the question of genre.

References

  1. Andersen, Tore Rye. 2012. Judging by the Cover. Critique 53 (3): 251–278.Google Scholar
  2. Bevernage, Berber, and Lore Colaert. 2014. History from the Grave? Politics of Time in Spanish Mass Grave Exhumations. Memory Studies 7 (4): 440–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bull, Anna Cento, and Hans Lauge Hansen. 2015. On Agonistic Memory. Memory Studies 9 (4): 390–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coffey, Michael. 2010. A Memoir’s Second Life. Publishers Weekly 257: 40, October 11.Google Scholar
  5. Erll, Astrid. 2008. Literature, Film, and the Mediality of Cultural Memory. In Cultural Memory Studies: An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook, ed. Astrid Erll and Ansgar Nünning. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Erll, Astrid. 2011. Travelling Memory. Parallax 17 (4): 4–18.Google Scholar
  7. Ferrándiz, Francisco. 2013. Exhuming the Defeated: Civil War Mass Graves in 21st-Century Spain. American Ethnologist 40 (1): 38–54.Google Scholar
  8. Hansen, Hans Lauge. 2011. Multiperspectivism in the Novels of the Spanish Civil War. Orbis Litterarum 66 (2): 148–166.Google Scholar
  9. Harrison, Colin. 2002. What Did You Do in the War? The New York Times, February 17.Google Scholar
  10. Huyssen, Andreas. 2003. Present Pasts—Urban Palimpsests and the Politics of Memory. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Linneberg, Arild. 2001. Tretten Triste Essays om Krig og Litteratur, Oslo: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
  12. Mouffe, Chantal. 2005. On the Political. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Mouffe, Chantal. 2012. An Agonistic Approach to the Future of Europe. New Literary History 43 (4): 629–640.Google Scholar
  14. O’Toole, Fintan. 2002. Guns in the Family. New York Review of Books, April 11.Google Scholar
  15. Ribeiro de Menezes, Alison. 2014. Embodying Memory in Contemporary Spain. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Rothe, Anne. 2011. Popular Trauma Culture: Selling the Pain of Others in the Mass Media. Piscataway: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Rothberg, Michael. 2009. Multidirectional Memory—Remembering the Holocaust in the Age of Decolonization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Weizman, Eyal. 2011. The Least of all Possible Evils. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  19. Winther, Ulrich. 2012. Images of Time. Paradigms of Memory and the Collapse of the Novel of Contemporary History in Spain. In Memory and Its Discontents: Spanish Culture in the Early Twenty-First Century, Hispanic Issues On Line 11 (Fall 2012), ed. Luis Martín-Estudillo and Nicholas Spadaccini, 12–34.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark

Personalised recommendations