Advertisement

Buridan on the Psychology and Morality of Appetitive Acts

  • Martin PickavéEmail author
Chapter
  • 195 Downloads
Part of the Historical-Analytical Studies on Nature, Mind and Action book series (HSNA, volume 3)

Abstract

Affective psychology plays only a very minor role in medieval De anima commentaries. John Buridan dedicates only a single question in his commentary to appetitive acts, namely question 18 of book III on “Whether in a human being one appetite is contrary to another.” As this contribution intends to demonstrate, Buridan’s response to this question contains a sophisticated moral psychology. In the first part of the contribution, the author examines the general framework of Buridan’s moral psychology. The second part is dedicated to show how Buridan uses this general framework in his account of what goes on in an agent when we act against our own best judgment. Unlike other contemporary philosophers, Buridan turns out to have the philosophical means to account for what is often referred to as “clear-eyed weakness of will”, where the agent really judges in the very instance of acting that he ought not do what he does. In this respect, Buridan’s psychology of appetitive acts seems to have a clear advantage over rival accounts, which often have to deny—on purely theoretical grounds—that such a phenomenon is possible.

Keywords

Appetitive psychology Weakness of the will Motivational conflicts Emotions 

Bibliography

Primary

  1. Aristotle. (1894). In L. Bywater (Ed.), Ethica Nicomachea. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aristotle. (1907) 1965. In R. D. Hicks (Trans.), De anima. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reprint, Amsterdam: A.M. Hakkert.Google Scholar
  3. Aristotle. (1964). In W. D. Ross & L. Minio-Paluello (Eds.), Analytica Posteriora. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  4. Avicenna. (1968–1972). In S. Van Riet (Ed.), Liber de anima. Louvain/Leiden: Editions Orientalistes/Brill.Google Scholar
  5. Brito, R. (1974). Quaestiones super librum tertium De anima. In W. Fauser (Ed.), Der Kommentar des Radulphus Brito zu Buch III De anima. Kritische Edition und philosophisch-historische Einleitung. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar

Secondary

  1. Knuuttila, S. (2004). Emotions in ancient and medieval philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Lagerlund, H. (2009). The unity of the soul and contrary appetites in medieval philosophy. In T. Lennon & R. Stainton (Eds.), The achilles of rationalist psychology (pp. 75–92). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Lottin, O. (1948). Les mouvements premiers de l’appétit sensitif de Pierre Lombard à saint Thomas d’Aquin. In Psychologie et morale aux XIIe et XIIIe siècles (Vol. 2, pp. 493–589). Louvain/Gembloux: Abbaye du Mont César/J. Duculot.Google Scholar
  4. Pickavé, M. (2010). On the intentionality of the emotions (and of other appetitive acts). Quaestio, 10, 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Pickavé, M., & Whiting, J. (2008). Nicomachean Ethics 7.3 on Akratic Ignorance. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 34, 323–371.Google Scholar
  6. Saarinen, R. (1993). John Buridan and Donald Davidson on Akrasia. Synthese, 96, 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Saarinen, R. (1994). Weakness of the will in medieval thought. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  8. Solomon, R. C. (1988). On emotions as judgments. American Philosophical Quarterly, 25, 183–191.Google Scholar
  9. Solomon, R. C. (1976) 1993. The passions: Emotions and the meaning of life. Garden City, NJ: Anchor Press/Doubleday. Reprint, Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  10. Sorabji, R. (2000). Emotion and peace of mind: From Stoic agitation to Christian temptation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Zupko, J. (1989). John Buridan’s philosophy of mind: An edition and translation of book III of his ‘Questions on Aristotle’s De anima’ (third redaction), with commentary and critical and interpretative essays. Ph.D. dissertation. Cornell University.Google Scholar
  12. Zupko, J. (1995). Freedom of choice in Buridan’s moral psychology. Mediaeval Studies, 57, 75–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Zupko, J. (2003). John Buridan: Portrait of a fourteenth-century arts master. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations