Culturally Appropriate Behavioral Change in Maternal Health: Role of Mobile and Online Technologies Over Time

  • Yuri QuintanaEmail author
  • Jennifer McWhirter
Part of the Health Informatics book series (HI)


A major challenge in global health is improving newborn and maternal health. A variety of economic, geopolitical, socio-cultural, and technical factors are involved. Online and mobile technologies hold the potential to improve maternal and newborn health by supporting access to education, improving coordinated care, and facilitating patient support. These online and mobile systems have been designed to address a variety of maternal and newborn health outcomes, including: increasing antenatal care attendance; cessation of unhealthy behaviors, such as smoking and drinking alcohol; and increasing vaccination rates of newborns. The success of these systems, however, is very much dependent on how—and whether—they can effect behavioral changes in culturally appropriate ways. This chapter reviews the design of these systems in both developed and developing countries, the technologies and behavioral frameworks used, and the evaluation outcomes. The acceptance of these new patient support networks requires the trust of patients and healthcare providers. Hence, this chapter also reviews the evolution of these systems, and the potential benefits of, and challenges for, their sustained operation.


mHealth Mobile health Maternal health Behavior change Health behavior 


  1. Abroms LC, et al. Quit4baby: results from a pilot test of a mobile smoking cessation program for pregnant women. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2015;3(10):e10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Agarwal AK, Murinson BB. New dimensions in patient-physician interaction: values, autonomy, and medical information in the patient-centered clinical encounter. Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2012;3(3):e0017.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50:179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen Jr B, Bazargan-Hejazi S. Evaluating a tailored intervention to increase screening mammography in an urban area. J Natl Med Assoc. 2005;97:1350–60.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. American Academy of Pediatrics Subcommittee on Hyperbilirubinemia. Management of hyperbilirubinemia in the newborn infant 35 or more weeks of gestation. Pediatrics. 2004;114(1):297–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191–215.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Freeman; 1997.Google Scholar
  8. Berwick DM. Disseminating innovations in health care. JAMA. 2003;289(15):1969–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Egnew TR, Wilson HJ. Faculty and medical students’ perceptions of teaching and learning about the doctor-patient relationship. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;79(2):199–206.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. Review four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA. 1992;267(16):2221–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Evans WD, Wallace JL, Snider J. Pilot evaluation of the text4baby mobile health program. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:1031.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Fishbein M. Readings in attitude theory and measurement. New York: Wiley; 1967.Google Scholar
  13. Gabrysch S, Lema C, Bedriñana E, Bautista MA, Malca R, Campbell OMR, Miranda JJ. Cultural adaptation of birthing services in rural Ayacucho, Peru. Bull World Health Organ. 2009;87:724–9. doi:  10.2471/BLT.08.057794. Accessed 11 July 2016.
  14. Galanti GA. Caring for patients from different cultures. 4th ed. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 2008.Google Scholar
  15. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM. Health behavior and health education: theory, research and practice. 4th ed. San Francisco: Wiley; 2008.Google Scholar
  16. Gray JE, Safran C, Davis RB, Pompilio-Weitzner G, Stewart JE, Zaccagnini L, Pursley D. Baby CareLink: using the internet and telemedicine to improve care for high-risk infants. Pediatrics 2000;106(6):1318–24. PubMed PMID: 11099583.Google Scholar
  17. Hollowell J, Oakley L, Kurinczuk JJ, Brocklehurst P, Gray R. The effectiveness of antenatal care programmes to reduce infant mortality and preterm birth in socially disadvantaged and vulnerable women in high-income countries: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11:13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. IDEO. Design thinking for educators toolkit. 2nd ed. 2012. Accessed 14 July 2016.
  19. IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics. Patient apps for improved healthcare from novelty to mainstream. 2013. Accessed 14 July 2016.
  20. International Telecommunications Union. ITU 2015 ICT figures. 2015. http://wwwituint/net/pressoffice/press_releases/2015/17aspx. Accessed 11 July 2016.
  21. Jat TR, Deo PR, Goicolea I, Hurtig AK, San Sebastian M. Socio-cultural and service delivery dimensions of maternal mortality in rural central India: a qualitative exploration using a human rights lens. Glob Health Action. 2015;8:24976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kirkwood NA. A hospital handbook on multiculturalism and religion, revised edition: practical guidelines for health care workers. Revised ed. New York: Morehouse Publishing; 2005.Google Scholar
  23. Kumar S, Nilsen WJ, Abernethy A, Atienza A, Patrick K, Pavel M, Riley WT, Shar A, Spring B, Spruijt-Metz D, Hedeker D, Honavar V, Kravitz R, Lefebvre RC, Mohr DC, Murphy SA, Quinn C, Shusterman V, Swendeman D. Mobile health technology evaluation: the mHealth evidence workshop. Am J Prev Med. 2013;45(2):228–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Lipkus I, Rimer B, Halabi S, Strigo T. Can tailored interventions increase mammography use among HMO women? Am J Prev Med. 2000;18:1–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu L, Johnson HL, Cousens S, Perin J, Scott S, Lawn JE, Rudan I, Campbell H, Cibulskis R, Li M, Mathers C, Black RE, Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group of WHO and UNICEF. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: an updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000. Lancet. 2012;379(9832):2151–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. MAMA. The mobile alliance for maternal action. 2016. Accessed 11 July 2016.
  27. Mauriello LM, Van Marter DF, Umanzor CD, Castle PH, de Aguiar EL. Using mHealth to deliver behavior change interventions within prenatal care at community health centers. Am J Health Promot. 2015; doi: 10.4278/ajhp.140530-QUAN-248.Google Scholar
  28. McKim R. Experiences in visual thinking. Belmont: Brooks/Cole; 1973.Google Scholar
  29. McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM. Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annu Rev Sociol. 2001;27:415–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Odeny TA, Bukusi EA, Cohen CR, Yuhas K, Camlin CS, McClelland S. Texting improves testing: a randomized trial of two-way SMS to increase postpartum prevention of mother-to-child transmission retention and infant HIV testing. AIDS. 2014a;28:2307–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Odeny TA, Newman M, Bukusi EA, McClelland RS, Cohen CR, Camlin CS. Developing content for a mHealth intervention to promote postpartum retention in prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission programs and early infant diagnosis of HIV: a qualitative study. PLoS One. 2014b;9:e106383.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Smartphone usage in the United States. 2015. Accessed 14 July 2016.
  33. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. The transtheoretical approach. In: Norcross JC, Goldfried MR, editors. Handbook of psychotherapy integration. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005. p. 147–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Proctor S. What determines quality in maternity care? Comprising the perceptions of childbearing women and midwives. Birth. 1998;25:85–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Rogers E. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. London: Simon and Schuster; 2003.Google Scholar
  36. Rosenstock I. Historical origins of the health belief model. Health Educ Monogr. 1974;2:328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rowe GP. Design thinking. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1987.Google Scholar
  38. Safran C. The collaborative edge: patient empowerment for vulnerable populations. Int J Med Inform. 2003;69(2–3):185–90. PubMed PMID: 12810122.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Simon H. The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1969.Google Scholar
  40. Society for Participatory Medicine. 2016. Accessed 11 July 2016.
  41. Sohl SJ, Moyer A. Tailored interventions to promote mammography screening: a meta-analytic review. Prev Med. 2007;45:252–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Tilden EL, Hersh SR, Emeis CL, Weinstein SR, Caughey AB. Group prenatal care: review of outcomes and recommendations for model implementation. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2014;69(1):46–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. World Health Organization. mHealth New horizons for health through mobile technologies. In: Global observatory for eHealth series—vol. 3. 2011. http://wwwwhoint/goe/publications/goe_mhealth_webpdf http://wwwwhoint/goe/publications/goe_mhealth_webpdf. Accessed 11 July 2016.
  44. World Health Organization. Every newborn: an action plan to end preventable deaths. 2014. http://wwwwhoint/maternal_child_adolescent/topics/newborn/enap_consultation/en. Accessed 11 July 2016.
  45. World Health Organization. Atlas of eHealth country profiles: the use of eHealth in support of universal health coverage: based on the findings of the third global survey on eHealth 2015. 2016. Accessed 11 July 2016.
  46. Yousuf J, Ayalew M, Seid F. Maternal health beliefs, attitudes and practices among Ethiopian Afar. Exch HIV/AIDS Sex Gend. 2013;1:14. Accessed 11 July 2016.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Clinical InformaticsBeth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterBrooklineUSA
  2. 2.Department of Population MedicineUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada

Personalised recommendations