Abstract
Diverse anthropogenic impacts will trigger worldwide environmental and social problems as e.g. climate change or social transformation processes. To observe these processes current information about status, direction of development and spatial or temporal dynamics of the processes are required. As the demand for current environmental information is increasing, earth observation (EO) and remote sensing (RS) techniques are moving to the focus of interest.
Generation and dissemination of RS based information products for e.g. time-critical applications can only be guaranteed by state-of-the-art concepts for data processing. This can be realized either by cumbersome and thus expensive interactive processing or by setting-up development and implementation of automated data processing infrastructure. In both cases information about data quality is important for the pre-processing and value adding processing steps. This contribution is focussed on a processor for automated data usability assessment which can be integrated into an automated processing chain adding information valuable for the user.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Cloud Cover Degree: Ratio of cloud pixels to total pixels of an unit (e.g. complete scene or quadrant of a scene).
- 2.
Data usability: Combination of cloud cover and cloud distribution as well as data errors.
- 3.
Quick-look data are preview images derived from original remote sensing data.
- 4.
Metadata describe remote sensing data (e.g. satellite mission, orbit, track, frame).
- 5.
LANDSAT-7/ETMÂ +Â data receiving were stopped at the end of 2003 [7].
- 6.
Meta-information: Contain further information on remote sensing data (e.g. satellite mission, orbit, track, frame number, etc.).
- 7.
Assessment unit: scene, quadrant.
- 8.
It has been shown that a threshold value of 10 is optimal because single zero-pixels are often caused by JPEG compression and were no data problem.
- 9.
LANDSAT-handbook: chapter 9.2.4, Table 9.2 ETM+ Thermal Constants.
- 10.
LANDSAT-handbook: chapter 9.2.4, Table 9.2 ETM+ Thermal Constants.
- 11.
The term Satellite Projection as it is used here is no projection in real sense of the word. A LANDSAT data track is resulting of sequential lines along the satellite path. Each line is a central projection from the satellite position.
References
EU. http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/space/gmes/. Accessed 06 Aug 2012
Borg, E., Fichtelmann, B., Asche, H.: Assessment for remote sensing data: accuracy of interactive data quality interpretation. In: Murgante, B., Gervasi, O., Iglesias, A., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O. (eds.) ICCSA 2011. LNCS, vol. 6783, pp. 366–375. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21887-3_29
Borg, E., Fichtelmann, B., Asche, H.: Cloud classification in JPEG-compressed remote sensing data (LANDSAT 7/ETM +). In: Murgante, B., Gervasi, O., Misra, S., Nedjah, N., Rocha, A.M.A.C., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O. (eds.) ICCSA 2012. LNCS, vol. 7334, pp. 347–357. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31075-1_26
Lau, W.-L., Li, Z.-L., Lam, K.W.-K.: Effects of JPEG compression on image classification. Int. J. Remote Sens. 24(7), 1535–1544 (2003)
Berutti, V.: LANDSAT 7 ESA Stations Network Report - Focus on Product Generation, LTWG 11, LANDSAT Technical Working Group Meeting (USGS/NASA), Canberra, Australia, 4–8 February, 21 p. (2002)
Bettac, H.-D., Reiniger, K., Brieß, K., Borg, E.: DLR/DFD presentation to the LGSOWG-30 Meeting, LGSOWG Meeting, Orlando, Florida, USA, 12–15 November, 22 p. (2001)
Pollex, J.: Oral communication (2011)
Schwarz, J., Bettac, H.D., Missling, K.-D.: Das DFD-Bodensegment für LANDSAT-7, DLR-Mitteilung 1999–2003, Mehl, D. (Eds.), Wessling, Germany, 20–21 October, pp. 49–56 (2000)
Biasutti, R., 2000, Cloud Cover Evaluation, LTWG 8, LANDSAT Technical Working Group Meeting (USGS/NASA), Ottawa, Canada, July 17–22, 10 p
Richter, R., Schläpfer, D.: Atmospheric/Topographic Correction for Satellite Imagery. DLR, Wessling (2011). DLR report DLR-IB 565-02/11
Huang, L., Li, Z.: Feature-based image registration using the shape context. Int. J. Remote Sens. 31(8), 2169–2177 (2010)
Borg, E., Fichtelmann, B., Böttcher, J., Günther, A., 2009, Processing of remote sensing data, EP 1 637 838 B1
Borg, E., Fichtelmann, B.: Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Feststellen einer Nutzbarkeit von Fernerkundungsdaten, DP 10 2004 024 595 B3 (2004)
NASA 2011. http://landsathandbook.gsfc.nasa.gov/. Accessed 06 Aug 2012
Irish, R.: LANDSAT 7 Automatic Cloud Cover Assessment. In: Sylvia, D. (Eds.) Proceedings of SPIE (4049) Algorithms for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery VI, pp. 348–355 (2000)
Xu, Q., Wu, W.: ACRES Automatic Cloud Cover Assessment of LANDSAT 7 Images, Spatial Sciences Conference 2003 – Spatial Knowledge Without Boundaries Canberra, September 23–26, 10 p (2003)
Slater, P.N., Biggar, S.F., Holm, R.G., Jackson, R.D., Mao, Y., Moran, M.S., Palmer, J.M., Yuan, B.: Reflectance and radiance-based methods for the in-flight absolute calibration of multispectral sensors. Remote Sens. Environ. 22, 11–37 (1987)
Markham, B.L., Barker, J.L.: Spectral characterization of the LANDSAT thematic mapper sensors. Int. J. Remote Sens. 6, 697–716 (1985)
Chander, G., Markham, B.L., Helder, D.L.: Summary of current radiometric calibration coefficients for LANDSAT MSS, TM, ETM+, and EO-1 ALI sensors. Remote Sens. Environ. 113, 893–903 (2009). http://landportal.gsfc.nasa.gov/Documents/Landsat_Calibration_Summary.pdf. Accessed 20 Feb 2012
Gurney, R.J., Hall, D.K.: Satellite-derived surface energy balance estimates in the Alaskan Sub-Arctic. J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol. 22(1), 115–125 (1983)
MATHEMATIK, Kleine Enzyklopädie, Verlag Enzyklopädie, Leipzig (1970)
Johnson, D.B., Flament, P., Bernstein, R.L.: High-resolution satellite imagery for mesoscale meteorological studies. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 75, 5–34 (1994)
Wu, Z.-J., McAvaney, B.: Sampling methods for climate model calculated brightness temperatures. BMRC Research Report No. 117, Bureau of Meteorology, Australia (2005)
Ignatov, A., Lazlo, I., Harrod, E.D., Kidwell, K.B., Goodrum, G.P.: Equator crossing times for NOAA, ERS and EOS sun-synchronous satellites. Int. J. Remote Sens. 25, 5255–5266 (2004)
Bush, K.A., Smith, G.L., Young, D.F.: The NOAA-9 earth radiation budget experiment wide field-of-view data set. In: 10th Conference on Atmospheric Radiation, June 1999, NASA 1999 Technical Docs (1999)
Duffett-Smith, P.: Practical Astronomy with Your Calculator, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Port Melbourne, Cambridge, Madrid) (1988)
Analytical Graphics, Inc. http://www.agi.com/
Fichtelmann, B., Borg, E., Kriegel, M.: Verfahren zur operationellen Bereitstellung von Zusatzdaten für die automatische Fernerkundungsdatenverarbeitung, 23. In: Salzburg, S. et al. (Eds.) AGIT-Symposium, pp. 12–20. Wichmann, Berlin, Offenbach (2011)
Lehmann, T., Oberschelp, W., Pelikan, E., Repges, R.: Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin-Grundlagen Modelle, Methoden, Anwendungen, p. 462. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)
Haberäcker, P.: Praxis der digitalen Bildverarbeitung und Mustererkennung. Hanser, München (1995)
Fichtelmann, B., Borg, E.: A new self-learning algorithm for dynamic classification of water bodies. In: Murgante, B., Gervasi, O., Misra, S., Nedjah, N., Rocha, A.M.A.C., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O. (eds.) ICCSA 2012. LNCS, vol. 7335, pp. 457–470. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31137-6_35
Fichtelmann, B., Guenther, K.P., Borg, E.: Adaption of a self-learning algorithm for dynamic classification of water bodies to SPOT VEGETATION Data. In: Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Misra, S., Gavrilova, M.L., Rocha, A.M.A.C., Torre, C., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O. (eds.) ICCSA 2015. LNCS, vol. 9158, pp. 177–192. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21410-8_14
Acknowledgement
The authors thank Dr. Berutti, Dr. Pitella, Dr. Biasutti (all European Space Agency) for the provided test data, for the constructive discussions, and the shown interest in our investigations. The authors wish to thanks E. Schwarz from the German Remote Date Center, Department of National Ground Segment Neustrelitz for his activities for determination of the actual equator crossing time.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Borg, E., Fichtelmann, B., Fischer, C., Asche, H. (2016). Design and Implementation of Data Usability Processor into an Automated Processing Chain for Optical Remote Sensing Data. In: Lamprecht, AL. (eds) Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification, and Validation . ISoLA 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 683. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51641-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51641-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51640-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51641-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)