Skip to main content

Organisations and American Collective Self-Understanding

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Social Organisation of Marketing
  • 763 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explores how what David Potter called “the American cult of equality and individualism” prevents Americans forming a realistic understanding of their society. In particular, individualism blocks the perception of grossly unequal power ratios. Drawing upon the work of Charles Perrow, the chapter discusses the growth in the United States of large-scale organisations of many sorts and their effects on people’s habitus. It concludes by relating American individualism to what Norbert Elias called the homo clausus mode of self-experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Atkinson, A. B. (2015). Inequality: What can be done? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. B., & Piketty, T. (2007). Top incomes over the twentieth century: A contrast between English-speaking and European countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, R. (2010, August 14). Spirited defence: How “ideas wreckers” turned bestseller into political punchbag. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2010/aug/14/the-spirit-level-equality-thinktanks. Accessed 20 October 2016.

  • De Tocqueville, A. (1961 [1835–1840]). Democracy in America. New York: Schocken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (2010 [1987]). The society of individuals. Dublin: University College Dublin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (2012 [1939]). On the process of civilisation. Dublin: University College Dublin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzhugh, G. (1854). Sociology for the south, or the failure of free society. Richmond, VA: A. Morris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, S. (2015). The age of acquiescence: The life and death of American resistance to organized wealth and power. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marris, R. (1964). The economic theory of “managerial” capitalism. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mastenbroek, W. F. G. (1999). Negotiation as emotion management. Theory, Culture and Society, 16(4), 49–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mennell, S. (2007). The American civilizing process. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mennell, S. (2015). Explaining American hypocrisy. Human Figurations, 4(2), 2. http://quod.lib.umich.edu/h/humfig/11217607.0004.202/–explaining-american-hypocrisy?rgn=main;view=fulltext.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packard, V. (1957). The hidden persuaders. New York: David McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (2002) Organizing America: Wealth, Power and the Origins of Corporate Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, D. M. (1968). Civil war. In C. Vann Woodward (ed.), The comparative approach to American history (pp. 135–145). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riesman, D., Glazer, N., & Denney, R. (1950). The lonely crowd: A study of the changing American character. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosanvallon, P. (2013). The society of equals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. (1998). The corrosion of character. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokvis, R. (1999). Concurrentie en baschaving: ondernemingen en het commercieël beschavingsproces. Amsterdam: Boom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. H. (1956). The organization man. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, C. (2004). Sex and manners: Female emancipation in the West, 1890–2000. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, C. (2007). Informalisation: Manners and emotions since 1890. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, C., & Mennell, S. (2015). Discussing theories and processes of civilisation and informalisation: Criteriology. Human Figurations, 4(3). http://quod.lib.umich.edu/h/humfig/11217607.0004.302/–discussing-theories-and-processes-of-civilisation?rgn=main;view=fulltext.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Mennell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mennell, S. (2017). Organisations and American Collective Self-Understanding. In: Connolly, J., Dolan, P. (eds) The Social Organisation of Marketing. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51571-7_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics