Skip to main content

Minimizing Cathode Voltage Drop by Optimizing Cathode Slot Design

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Light Metals 2017

Abstract

Contact resistance between cathode block and cast iron plays an important role for the ohmic resistance of the cathode system and hence for the cathode voltage drop (CVD). Investigations of the standard dove-tail cathode slot design showed poor electrical contact in the bottom of the slot and small contact area on the cathode wings. Different thermo-mechanical properties of carbon cathode block, cast iron, and steel collector bar resulted in displacements relative to each other after rodding, during cooling and handling. To mitigate this effect without changing materials or procedures, different slot geometries were modeled with respect to preheating and casting. By introducing anchoring grooves for the cast iron at the bottom corners of the slot, bottom contact was achieved: Lab tests proved that voltage drop between cathode slot bottom and cast iron decreased significantly. Subsequent field trials showed a CVD reduction of 20 mV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. M. Segatz et al., Hydro’s cell technology path towards specific energy consumption below 12 kWh/kg. Light Met., 301–305 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Thibeault et al., Rio Tinto Alcan AP4X low energy cell development. Light Met., 543–547 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Zarouni, M. Reverdy, Dubal low energy aluminium electrolysis cell design and operation. ALUM., No. 1–2, 26–27 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Zhou et al., Chinalco 600 kA high capacity low energy consumption reduction cell development. Light Met., 483–487 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Lu et al., New progress on application of NEUI 400 kA family high energy efficiency aluminum reduction pot (“HEEP”) technology. Light Met., 443–448 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.T. Keniry, Threats & opportunities for aluminium smelting in a carbon-priced world. in Proceedings of the 10th Australasian Aluminium Smelting Technology Conference, Lanceston, Australia, October 2011

    Google Scholar 

  7. V. Kovács, L. Kiss, Comparative analysis of the environmental impacts of aluminum smelting technologies. Light Met., 529–534 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. W.E. Haupin, Cathode voltage loss in aluminum smelting cells. Light Met., 339–349 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Sørlie, H. Gran, Cathode collector bar-to-carbon contact resistance. Light Met., 780–787 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  10. F. Hiltmann et al., Influence of temperature and contact pressure between cast iron and cathode carbon on contact resistance. Light Met., 277–283 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Beeler, Bar to block contact resistance in aluminum reduction cell cathode assemblies. Light Met., 507–511 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Dupuis, Development and application of an ANSYS Based thermo-electro-mechanical collector bar slot design tool. Light Met., 519–524 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Emami et al., Development of a new methodology to measure contact pressure along a thermo-electro-mechanical interface. Light Met., 1281–1284 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. Richard et al., Thermo-electro-mechanical modeling of the contact between steel and carbon cylinders using the finite element method. Light Met., 523–528 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. Richard et al., Challenges in Stub hole optimisation of cast iron rodded anodes. Light Met., 1067–1072 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. A.T. Brimmo, M.I. Hassan, Modeling the electrical contact at steel-carbon interfaces. JOM 68(1), 49–57 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. I. Letizia et al., How to improve the pig iron sealing of metallic bars in cathode carbon blocks. Light Met., 1025–1036 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  18. B. Larsen, M. Sørlie, Stress analysis of cathode bottom blocks. Light Met., 641–646 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  19. L. Caruso et al., Experimental comparison of cathode rodding practices. Light Met., 827–831 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Wilkening, J. Côté, Problems of the stub-anode connection. Light Met., 865–873 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Sørlie, H.A. Øye, Cathodes in aluminium electrolysis (Aluminium-Verlag Marketing & Kommunikation GmbH, Düsseldorf, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Sørlie et al., Early failure mechanisms in aluminium cell cathodes. Light Met., 299–308 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Zolochevsky, Rapoport-samoilenko test for cathode carbon materials—II. Swelling with external pressure and effect of creep. Carbon 43, 1222–1230 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. E. Bernhauser, J. Mittag, A comparative examination on ageing of cathodes amorphous versus graphitic type. Light Met., 725–729 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. Hop et al., Chemical and physical changes of cathode carbon by aluminium electrolysis. Min. Proc. Extractive Metall. (Trans. Inst. Min. Metall. C), 144, C181–C187 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  26. T. Reek et al., Successful dry restart of the hamburg smelter. Light Met., 461–466 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  27. M. Pfeffer, F. Pfefferer, Kathodenblock aufweisend eine neuartige Nut-Geometrie (patent pending DE102016210693.7, submitted 15 June 2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralph Friedrich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society

About this paper

Cite this paper

Friedrich, R. et al. (2017). Minimizing Cathode Voltage Drop by Optimizing Cathode Slot Design. In: Ratvik, A. (eds) Light Metals 2017. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51541-0_86

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics