Advertisement

Sexing Drugs, Refracting Discourses

  • Ericka Johnson
Chapter

Abstract

This book has discussed the way pharmaceuticals can produce sex/gender and be sexed/gendered in many different contexts. It presents empirical cases, covering pharmaceuticals on both ends of the adult subject and sex/gender in many different contexts. As such, it is an attempt to show the productive benefits of applying feminist technoscience studies’ theoretical tools about material-discursive entanglements and subjectivity to pharmaceutical studies and the political traction this can produce.

Keywords

Subject Position Healthy Subjectivity Medical Guideline Intergenerational Relationship Injured Body 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barad, K. 2003. Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Signs. Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28(3): 801–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ———. 2007. Meeting the Universe Half-Way. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Crenshaw, K. 1989. Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum 8: 139–167.Google Scholar
  4. Epstein, S. 2007. Inclusion: The Politics of Difference in Medical Research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fausto Sterling, A. 2000. Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  6. Haraway, D. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium.FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Hoel, A.S., and I. van der Tuin. 2013. The Ontological Force of Technicity: Reading Cassirer and Simondon Diffractively. Philosophy and Technology 26(2): 187–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jagger, G. 2015. The New Materialism and Sexual Difference. Signs. Journal of Women in Culture and Society 40(2): 321–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Johnson, E., and B. Berner, ed. 2010. Technology and Medical Practices. Blood, Guts and Machines. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  10. Johnson, E., E. Sjögren, and C. Åsberg. 2016. Glocal Pharma: International Brands and the Imagination of Local Masculinity. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  11. Kraus, Cynthia. 2000. Naked Sex in Exile: On the Paradox of the « Sex Question » in Feminism and in Science. National Women’s Studies Association Journal (NWSA) 12(3): 151–177.Google Scholar
  12. Law, J., and V. Singleton. 2005. Object Lessons. Organization 12(3): 331–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Löwy, I. 2015. Norms, Values and Constraints. In Value Practices in the Life Sciences and Medicine, ed. I. Dussauge, C.-F. Helgesson, and F. Lee, 186–205. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lykke, N. 2010. Feminist Studies. A Guide to Intersectional Theory, Methodology and Writing. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Mamo, Laura, and Jennifer Fishman. 2001. Potency in All the Right Places: Viagra as a Technology of the Gendered Body. Body & Society 7(4): 13–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marshall, Barbara. 2006. The New Virility: Viagra, Male Ageing and Sexual Function. Sexualities 9(3): 345–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Martin, E. 1992. The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  18. Mehrabi, Tara. 2016. Making Death Matter: A Feminist Technoscience Study of Alzheimer's Sciences in the Laboratory. Ph.D. thesis, Linköping University Press, Linköping.Google Scholar
  19. Mol, A. 2002. The Body Multiple. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. ———. 2008. Eat an Apple. On Theorizing Subjectivities. Subjectivity 22(1): 28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moser, Ingunn. 2006. Sociotechnical Practices and Difference: On the Interferences Between Disability, Gender, and Class. Science, Technology & Human Values 31(5): 537–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Murphy, M. 2012. Seizing the Means of Reproduction. Entanglements of Feminism, Health and Technoscience. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Oudshoorn, N. 1994. Beyond the Natural Body: An Archeology of Sex Hormones. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Roberts, C. 2015. Puberty in Crisis. The Sociology of Early Sexual Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schneider, J. 2002. Reflexive/Diffractive Ethnography. Cultural Studies—Critical Methodologies 2(4): 460–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Suchman, L. 2007. Human-Machine Reconfigurations. Plans and Situated Actions. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Thompson, C. 2005. Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. Boston, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Tiefer, Leonore. 2006. The Viagra Phenomenon. Sexualities 9(3): 273–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yuval-Davis, N. 2006. Intersectionality and Feminist Politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies 13(3): 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ericka Johnson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Thematic Studies, Technology and Social ChangeLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations