Sexing Drugs, Refracting Discourses

  • Ericka Johnson
Chapter

Abstract

This book has discussed the way pharmaceuticals can produce sex/gender and be sexed/gendered in many different contexts. It presents empirical cases, covering pharmaceuticals on both ends of the adult subject and sex/gender in many different contexts. As such, it is an attempt to show the productive benefits of applying feminist technoscience studies’ theoretical tools about material-discursive entanglements and subjectivity to pharmaceutical studies and the political traction this can produce.

References

  1. Barad, K. 2003. Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Signs. Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28(3): 801–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ———. 2007. Meeting the Universe Half-Way. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Crenshaw, K. 1989. Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum 8: 139–167.Google Scholar
  4. Epstein, S. 2007. Inclusion: The Politics of Difference in Medical Research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fausto Sterling, A. 2000. Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  6. Haraway, D. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium.FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Hoel, A.S., and I. van der Tuin. 2013. The Ontological Force of Technicity: Reading Cassirer and Simondon Diffractively. Philosophy and Technology 26(2): 187–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jagger, G. 2015. The New Materialism and Sexual Difference. Signs. Journal of Women in Culture and Society 40(2): 321–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Johnson, E., and B. Berner, ed. 2010. Technology and Medical Practices. Blood, Guts and Machines. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  10. Johnson, E., E. Sjögren, and C. Åsberg. 2016. Glocal Pharma: International Brands and the Imagination of Local Masculinity. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  11. Kraus, Cynthia. 2000. Naked Sex in Exile: On the Paradox of the « Sex Question » in Feminism and in Science. National Women’s Studies Association Journal (NWSA) 12(3): 151–177.Google Scholar
  12. Law, J., and V. Singleton. 2005. Object Lessons. Organization 12(3): 331–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Löwy, I. 2015. Norms, Values and Constraints. In Value Practices in the Life Sciences and Medicine, ed. I. Dussauge, C.-F. Helgesson, and F. Lee, 186–205. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lykke, N. 2010. Feminist Studies. A Guide to Intersectional Theory, Methodology and Writing. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Mamo, Laura, and Jennifer Fishman. 2001. Potency in All the Right Places: Viagra as a Technology of the Gendered Body. Body & Society 7(4): 13–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marshall, Barbara. 2006. The New Virility: Viagra, Male Ageing and Sexual Function. Sexualities 9(3): 345–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Martin, E. 1992. The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  18. Mehrabi, Tara. 2016. Making Death Matter: A Feminist Technoscience Study of Alzheimer's Sciences in the Laboratory. Ph.D. thesis, Linköping University Press, Linköping.Google Scholar
  19. Mol, A. 2002. The Body Multiple. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. ———. 2008. Eat an Apple. On Theorizing Subjectivities. Subjectivity 22(1): 28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moser, Ingunn. 2006. Sociotechnical Practices and Difference: On the Interferences Between Disability, Gender, and Class. Science, Technology & Human Values 31(5): 537–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Murphy, M. 2012. Seizing the Means of Reproduction. Entanglements of Feminism, Health and Technoscience. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Oudshoorn, N. 1994. Beyond the Natural Body: An Archeology of Sex Hormones. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Roberts, C. 2015. Puberty in Crisis. The Sociology of Early Sexual Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schneider, J. 2002. Reflexive/Diffractive Ethnography. Cultural Studies—Critical Methodologies 2(4): 460–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Suchman, L. 2007. Human-Machine Reconfigurations. Plans and Situated Actions. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Thompson, C. 2005. Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. Boston, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Tiefer, Leonore. 2006. The Viagra Phenomenon. Sexualities 9(3): 273–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yuval-Davis, N. 2006. Intersectionality and Feminist Politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies 13(3): 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ericka Johnson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Thematic Studies, Technology and Social ChangeLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations