Implications for Development, Peacebuilding and Statebuilding

  • Andrew GlazzardEmail author
  • Sasha Jesperson
  • Thomas Maguire
  • Emily Winterbotham


The messiness of the orientation, aims, tactics and recruitment strategies of Islamist violent extremist groups has implications for development, peacebuilding and statebuilding. Although the role of development in conflict-affected states has long been recognised, there is a reluctance to directly engage with violent extremism. Based on the case study analysis, this chapter identifies a hierarchy of interventions. Development practitioners should work in an “IVE-sensitive” manner even when not directly addressing extremist violence. A number of other interventions can also directly target violent extremism including building or rebuilding state capacity and promoting inclusive political settlements. While these activities point to a similar response to other conflicts, ideology affects interventions and requires a detailed contextual understanding of the conflict.


Development Peacebuilding Statebuilding Inclusive politics Service provision 


  1. Amnesty International. 2014. Nigeria: Gruesome Footage Implicates Military in War Crimes. Available at:
  2. Chowdhury Fink, Naureen. 2015. The Blue Flag in Grey Zones: Exploring the Relationships Between Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) and Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration (DDR) in UN Field Operations. In UN DDR in An Era of Violent Extremism: Is it Fit for Purpose? ed. James Cockayne and Siobhan O’Neil. Tokyo: UNU-CPR.Google Scholar
  3. Dowd, Robert. 2014. Religious Diversity and Violent Conflict: Lessons from Nigeria. The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs 38 (1): 153–168.Google Scholar
  4. European Union. 2015. Strengthening Resilience to Violence and Extremism. European Commission Internal Document.Google Scholar
  5. ESRC. 2015. Security, Religion and Radicalisation, Evidence Briefing. Available at:
  6. Finke, Roger, and Jaime Harris. 2012. Wars and Rumors of Wars: Explaining Religiously Motivated Violence. In Religion, Politics, Society and the State, ed. J. Fox, 53–71. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar
  7. Finke, Roger, and Robert Martin. 2012. Religious Freedom and Conflict: A Review of the Evidence. USAID Conflict Management and Mitigation Office.Google Scholar
  8. Gerges, Fawaz A. 2005. The Far Enemy: Why Jihad Went Global, 2nd Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Goodhand, Jonathan. 2001a. A Synthesis Report: Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Nepal and Sri Lanka. Conflict Assessments. Conflict, Security and Development Group. London: Kings College.Google Scholar
  10. Goodhand, Jonathan. 2001b. Violent Conflict, Poverty and Chronic Poverty. CPRC Working Paper 6, Chronic Poverty Research Centre.Google Scholar
  11. Goodhand, Jonathan. 2006a. Preparing to Intervene. In Civil War, Civil Peace, ed. Helen Yanacopulos and Joseph Hanlon. Melton: James Currey.Google Scholar
  12. Goodhand, Jonathan. 2006b. Working ‘In’ and ‘On’ War. In Civil War, Civil Peace, ed. Helen Yanacopulos and Joseph Hanlon. Melton: James Currey.Google Scholar
  13. Hansen, Emmanuel. 1987. Africa: Perspectives on Peace and Development. London: Zed Press.Google Scholar
  14. Jesperson, Sasha. 2015. Development Engagement with Organised Crime: A Necessary Shift or Further Securitisation? Conflict, Security and Development 15 (1): 23–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Krause, Keith, and Oliver Jutersonke. 2005. Peace Security and Development in Post-Conflict Environments. Security Dialogue 36 (4): 447–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kunovich, Robert M. and Hodson, Randy. 1999. ‘Conflict, Religious Identity, and Ethnic Intolerance in Croatia’, Social Forces 78 (2): 643–668.Google Scholar
  17. Martin-Rayo, Francisco. 2011. ‘Countering Radicalisation in Refugee Camps: How Education can Help Defeat AQAP’. The Dubai Initiative, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Dubai School of Government (DSG) and the Harvard Kennedy School (HKS).
  18. O’Neill, Siobhan, and Cockayne James. 2015. Conclusion. In UN DDR in an Era of Violent Extremism: Is it Fit for Purpose? ed. James Cockayne and Siobhan O’Neil. Tokyo: UNU-CPR.Google Scholar
  19. Tilly, Charles. 2003. The Politics of Collective Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Turkmani, Rim. 2015. ISIL, Jan and the War Economy in Syria. London: London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  21. Uvin, Peter. 2002. The Development/Peacebuilding Nexus: A Typology and History of Changing Paradigms. Journal of Peacebuilding and Development 1 (1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zaum, Dominik, Gippert, Birte and Heaven Corrine. 2015. Building Peaceful States and Societies: A Critical Assessment of the Evidence. London: DfID.Google Scholar
  23. Zeiger, Sara, and Anne Aly (eds.). 2015. Countering Violent Extremism: Developing an Evidence-Base for Policy and Practice. Bentley: Curtin University/Hedayah Center.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Glazzard
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sasha Jesperson
    • 2
  • Thomas Maguire
    • 3
  • Emily Winterbotham
    • 4
  1. 1.National Security and ResilienceRoyal United Services InstituteLondonUK
  2. 2.Centre for the Study of Modern SlaverySt Mary’s UniversityLondonUK
  3. 3.Department of War StudiesKings College LondonLondonUK
  4. 4.National Security and ResilienceRoyal United Services InstituteLondonUK

Personalised recommendations