Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mechanical Properties and Behavior of Additive Manufactured Stainless Steel 316L

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Characterization of Minerals, Metals, and Materials 2017

Part of the book series: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series ((MMMS))

Abstract

Additive Manufacturing (AM) has become increasingly popular due to the ability to produce components with complex geometries and properties. The efficiency of this manufacturing method is investigated in this paper by examining the mechanical performance of AM austenitic stainless steel 316L under different strain rates. Dynamic compression experiments were conducted by using a Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB). Microstructural observations were performed by utilizing optical microscopy. The behavior of this material is compared against stainless steel 316L manufactured by conventional methods. The results show that the AM 316L used in this study display a considerable difference in the mechanical properties compared with conventional stainless steel alloys.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Frazier WE (2014) Metal additive manufacturing: a review. J Mater Eng Perform 23(6):1917–1928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sultan A, Sharif S, Kurniawan D (2015) Chip formation when drilling AISI 316L stainless steel using carbide twist drill. Procedia Manufact 2:224–229. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.039

  3. Lind J, Hanninen J, Kotila J, Nyrhila O, Syvanen T (2002) Rapid manufacturing with direct metal laser sintering. In: MRS proceedings, p 758. doi:10.1557/proc-758-ll1.2

  4. Gu D, Meiners W, Wissenbach K, Poprawe R (2012) Laser additive manufacturing of metallic components: materials, processes and mechanisms. Int Mater Rev 57(3):133–164. doi:10.1179/1743280411y.0000000014

  5. Balla V, DeVasConCellos P, Xue W, Bose S, Bandyopadhyay A (2009) Fabrication of compositionally and structurally graded Ti–TiO2 structures using laser engineered net shaping (LENS). Acta Biomater 5(5):1831–1837. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2009.01.011

  6. Wu D, Liang X, Li Q, Jiang L (2011) Fabrication of SS316L/Ni25 Functionally gradient materials using laser engineered net shaping. Mater Sci Forum 675–677:803–806. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.675-677.803

  7. Riza S, Masood S, Wen C, Ruan D, Xu S (2014) Dynamic behaviour of high strength steel parts developed through laser assisted direct metal deposition. Mater Des 64:650–659. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2014.08.026

  8. Ahmed AA, Mhaede M, Wollmann M, Wagner L (2014) Effect of surface and bulk plastic deformations on the corrosion resistance and corrosion fatigue performance of AISI 316L. Surf Coat Technol 259:448–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lindholm U (1964) Some experiments with the split hopkinson pressure bar∗. J Mech Phys Solids 12(5):317–335. doi:10.1016/0022-5096(64)90028-6

  10. Ellwood S, Griffiths L, Parry D (1982) Materials testing at high constant strain rates. J Phys E Sci Instrum 15(3):280–282. doi:10.1088/0022-3735/15/3/009

  11. Song B, Chen W, Antoun B, Frew D (2007) Determination of early flow stress for ductile specimens at high strain rates by using a SHPB. Exp Mech 47(5):671–679. doi:10.1007/s11340-007-9048-6

  12. Standard ASTM (2014) Standard test methods of compression testing of metallic materials at room temperature. In: 2014 annual book of ASTM standards, ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sencer B, Maloy S, Gray G (2005) The influence of shock-pulse shape on the structure/property behavior of copper and 316L austenitic stainless steel. Acta Mater 53(11):3293–3303. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2005.03.037

  14. ASM Material Data Sheet (2016) Asm.matweb.com. Retrieved 9 Apr 2016, from http://asm.matweb.com/search/SpecificMaterial.asp?bassnum=MQ316Q

  15. Lee WS, Chen TH, Lin CF, Luo WZ (2011) Dynamic mechanical response of biomedical 316L stainless steel as function of strain rate and temperature. Bioinorg Chem Appl

    Google Scholar 

  16. Olleak AA, Nasr MN, El-Hofy H (2015) The influence of Johnson-Cook parameters on SPH modelling of orthogonal cutting of AISI 316L

    Google Scholar 

  17. Umbrello D, M’saoubi R, Outeiro JC (2007) The influence of Johnson–Cook material constants on finite element simulation of machining of AISI 316L steel. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(3):462–470

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Engineering and Information Technology, UNSW Australia at the Australian Defence Force Academy, Canberra, ACT, 2600, Australia

    M. A. Bevan, A. A. H. Ameri, D. C. Austin, A. D. Brown, P. J. Hazell & J. P. Escobedo-Diaz

  2. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia

    D. East

Authors
  1. M. A. Bevan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. A. H. Ameri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. East
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. D. C. Austin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. D. Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. P. J. Hazell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. J. P. Escobedo-Diaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. P. Escobedo-Diaz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Al Isra University , Amman, Jordan

    Shadia Ikhmayies

  2. Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan, USA

    Bowen Li

  3. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA

    John S. Carpenter

  4. Canmet Materials , Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

    JIan Li

  5. Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan, USA

    Jiann-Yang Hwang

  6. Military Institute of Engineering, IME, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil

    Sergio Neves Monteiro

  7. Poltecnico di Torino , Turin, Italy

    Donato Firrao

  8. ArcelorMittal Global R&D, East Chicago, Indiana, USA

    Mingming Zhang

  9. Central South University , Changsha, China

    Zhiwei Peng

  10. University of New South Wales , Canberra, Australia

    Juan P. Escobedo-Diaz

  11. Chongqing University , Chongqing, China

    Chenguang Bai

  12. Middle East Technical University , Ankara, Turkey

    Yunus Eren Kalay

  13. Naval Research Laboratory , Washington, District of Columbia, USA

    Ramasis Goswami

  14. Korea Railroad Research Institute, Uiwang, Korea (Republic of)

    Jeongguk Kim

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bevan, M.A. et al. (2017). Mechanical Properties and Behavior of Additive Manufactured Stainless Steel 316L. In: Ikhmayies, S., et al. Characterization of Minerals, Metals, and Materials 2017. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51382-9_63

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation