Abstract
It is argued that while the idea of sustainable development fails adequately to provide a way forward for addressing our current environmental crisis, the idea of sustainability contains the germ of an understanding of the character of human consciousness that places our relationship with nature at the heart of both human being and authentic education. A phenomenological approach is developed to explore some key aspects of our experience of nature—particularly its “otherness” and intrinsic normativity. The potential of the mutually sustaining relationship with nature that emerges for shaping our outlook on the world, and revealing the subverting effects of the scientism that is taken to permeate contemporary Western-style culture, are discussed. Some broad implications for a re-envisioned education are sketched.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Notes
- 1.
This is not to say that we should never seek to modify nature. It is simple to introduce the point that there is an important sense in which nature is normative and that recognition of this is relevant to responsible thought and action.
- 2.
There are resonances here with some interpretations of Aristotle’s nous pathetikos (De Anima iii 4)]. See, for example, Skúlason (2015).
- 3.
Working in a very different (analytic) philosophical tradition, Peter Strawson (1964) comes to a similar conclusion with his notion of “persons.”
References
Arendt, H. (1998). The human condition (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Aristotle. (1987). De anima. London: Penguin Books.
Bonnett, M. (1999). Education for sustainable development: A coherent philosophy for environmental education? Cambridge Journal of Education, 29(3), 313–324.
Bonnett, M. (2004). Retrieving nature: Education for a post-humanist age. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bonnett, M. (2009). Education, sustainability, and the metaphysics of nature. In M. McKenzie, P. Hart, H. Bai & B. Jickling (Eds.), Fields of green: Restorying culture, environment, and education (pp. 177–186). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Bonnett, M. (2012). Environmental concern, moral education, and our place in nature. Journal of Moral Education Special Issue: Moral Education and Environmental Concern, 41(3), 285–300.
Bonnett, M. (2015). The powers that be: Environmental education and the transcendent. Policy Futures in Education, 13(1), 42–56.
Brentano, F. (1995). Psychology from an empirical standpoint. London: Routledge.
Heidegger, M. (1972). Being and time. Oxford: Blackwell.
Heise, U. (2008). Sense of place and sense of planet. New York: Oxford University Press.
Husserl, E. (2001). Logical investigations: Volume II. London: Routledge.
Jickling, B. (1992). Why I don’t want my children to be educated for sustainable development. Journal of Environmental Education, 23(4), 5–8.
Russell, B. (1959). The problems of philosophy. London: Oxford University Press.
Skúlason, P. (2015). The wildness of nature: Its significance for our understanding of the world. In P. Kemp & S. Froland (Eds.), Nature in education (pp. 81–89). Zurich: LIT Verlag.
Strawson, P. (1964). Individuals. London: Methuen.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bonnett, M. (2017). Sustainability and Human Being: Towards the Hidden Centre of Authentic Education. In: Jickling, B., Sterling, S. (eds) Post-Sustainability and Environmental Education. Palgrave Studies in Education and the Environment. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51322-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51322-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51321-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51322-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)