Skip to main content

Bird Mortality in Two Dutch Wind Farms: Effects of Location, Spatial Design and Interactions with Powerlines

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Wind Energy and Wildlife Interactions

Abstract

Numerous field studies have assessed bird mortality rates in wind farms. However, results from different studies are often hard to compare due to differences in methodology. This makes it very difficult to draw conclusions and to use the results in the planning phase of new wind farms (e.g. how to mitigate impacts). In this study, it was attempted to assess how bird mortality rates are affected by (1) the location of the wind farm, (2) the spatial layout of the turbines, (3) the surrounding terrain and (4) the presence of other obstacles such as powerlines. This study involved the monitoring of 91 turbines in two contrasting wind farms in the Netherlands for five years. It used the same standardized search methodology, including experimental trials for carcass removal and search efficiency. The sites differ in location (coastal vs. inland), spatial layout, turbine dimensions, land use, bird community and flight intensity of birds. In addition, at one site powerlines were constructed halfway through the monitoring program. Any fatalities from these powerlines were also monitored in a separate monitoring program. This enabled a comparison of any differences in mortality rates or species composition between the turbine and powerline fatalities. The results show a major impact of turbine location on the number of bird fatalities, both within the same wind farm and between wind farms. Mortality rates at the coastal wind farm were three to five times higher than at the inland wind farm. By far the highest mortality rates were found at turbines close to high-tide roosts and at points where (during spring migration) migrating birds leave the coastline to cross the sea towards Germany or Scandinavia. At these turbines, mortality rates could rise up to several hundred of birds per turbine per year. When expressed in fatalities per ha, overall fatality rates of the powerlines were three times higher than of the turbines in the same area. This may be due to low visibility of the powerlines compared to wind turbines. Comparison of turbine versus powerline fatalities also showed major differences in species composition, with powerline fatalities mostly consisting of passerines and waterfowl, and turbine fatalities being dominated by gulls. As several new wind farms are planned to be realized in the coming years, the results of this study can be used in spatial planning to both assess and mitigate potential impacts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alerstam T (1990) Bird migration. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnett EB, Erickson WP, Kerns J, Horn J (2005) Relationships between bats and wind turbines in Pennsylvania and West Virginia: an assessment of bat fatality search protocols, patterns of fatality, and behavioral interactions with wind turbines. A final report submitted to the bats and wind energy cooperative. Bat Conservation International. Austin, Texas, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevanger KM, Bartzke G, Brøseth H, Dahl EL, Gjershaug JO, Hanssen FO, Jacobsen KO, Kvaløy P, May RF, Meås R, Nygård T, Refsnæs S, Stokke S, Thomassen J (2011) Optimal design and routing of power lines; ecological, technical and economic perspectives (OPTIPOL). Progress report 2011, Norsk Institutt for Naturforskning

    Google Scholar 

  • Bispo R, Bernardino J, Marques TA, Pestana D (2013) Modeling carcass removal time for avian mortality assessment in wind farms using survival analysis. Environ Ecol Stat 20:147–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowlin MS, Enstrom DA, Murphy BJ, Plaza E, Jurich P, Cochran J (2015) Unexplained altitude changes in a migrating thrush: long-flight altitude data from radio-telemetry. Auk 132:808–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenninkmeijer A, Van der Weyde C (2011) Monitoring aanvaringsslachtoffers Windpark Delfzijl-Zuid 2006–2011. Eindrapportage vijf jaar monitoring. A&W-rapport 1656. Altenburg & Wymenga ecologisch onderzoek bv, Feanwâlden

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell RK (2013). Estimates: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 9, http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates/

  • Drewitt AL, Langston RHW (2008) Collision effects of wind-power generators and other obstacles on birds. Ann NY Acad Sci 1334:233–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everaert J (2008) Effecten van windturbines op de fauna in Vlaanderen. Onderzoeksresultaten, discussie en aanbevelingen. Rapportnr. INBO.R.2008.44. Instituut voor Natuur-en Bosonderzoek, Brussel

    Google Scholar 

  • Everaert J (2014) Collision risk and micro-avoidance rates of birds with wind turbines in Flanders. Bird Study 61:220–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everaert J, Stienen EWM (2007) Impact of wind turbines on birds in Zeebrugge (Belgium). Significant effect on breeding tern colony due to collisions. Biodiv Cons 16:3345–3359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli N, Colwell RK (2001) Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol Lett 4:379–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK (2010) Estimating species richness. In: Magurran AE, McGill BJ (eds) Biological diversity: frontiers in measurement and assessment. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 39–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Grünkorn T, Diederichs A, Stahl B, Poszig D, Nehls G (2005) Entwicklung einer Methode zur Abschätzung des Kollisionsrisikos von Vögeln an Windenergieanlagen. Unveröff. Gutachten Im Auftrag des Landesamtes für Natur und Umwelt Schleswig-Holstein

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman JC, Gyimesi A, Prinsen HAM (2010) Veldonderzoek naar draadslachtoffers en vliegbewegingen bij een gemarkeerde 150 kV hoogspanningslijn. Rapportnr. 10-082, Bureau Waardenburg bv, Culemborg

    Google Scholar 

  • Hötker H (2006) Auswirkungen des ‘Repowering’ von Windkraftanlagen auf Vögel und Fledermäuse. Michael-Otto-Institut im NABU-Forschungs—und Bildungszentrum für Feuchtgebiete und Vogelschutz, Berghusen

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain A, Kerlinger P, Curry R, Slobodnik L, Lehman M (2009) Annual report for the maple ridge wind power project. Post-construction bird and bat fatality study—2008. Seracuse, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Janss GFE (2000) Avian mortality from power lines: a morphologic approach of a species-specific mortality. Biol Cons 95:353–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahlert J, Leito A, Laubek B, Luigujõe L, Kuresoo A, Aaen K, Luud A (2012) Factors affecting the flight altitude of migrating waterbirds in Western Estonia. Ornis Fenn 89:241–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Klop E, Brenninkmeijer A (2014a) Monitoring aanvaringsslachtoffers Windpark Eemshaven 2009–2014. Eindrapportage vijf jaar monitoring. A&W-rapport 1975. Altenburg & Wymenga ecologisch onderzoek bv, Feanwâlden

    Google Scholar 

  • Klop E, Brenninkmeijer A (2014b) Vervolgmonitoring vogelslachtoffers hoogspanningslijnen Eemshaven. Jaarrapportage 2013–2014. A&W-rapport 2062. Altenburg & Wymenga ecologisch onderzoek bv, Feanwâlden

    Google Scholar 

  • Koops FBJ (1979) Een miljoen draadslachtoffers, wat kunnen we er tegen doen? Lepelaar 63:20–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Korner-Nievergelt F, Korner-Nievergelt P, Behr O, Niermann I, Brinkmann R, Hellriegel B (2011) A new method to determine bird and bat fatality at wind energy turbines from carcass searches. Wildl Biol 17:350–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korner-Nievergelt F, Behr O, Brinkmann R, Etterson M, Huso MMP, Dalthorp D, Korner-Nievergelt P, Roth T, Niermann I (2015) Mortality estimation from carcass searches using the R-package carcass—a turorial. Wildl Biol 21:30–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledec GC, Rapp KW, Aiello RG (2011) Greening the wind: environmental and social considerations for wind power development in Latin America and beyond (conference ed). The World Bank, Washington, DC. Report www.tinyurl.com/GreeningTheWind

  • Loss SR, Will T, Marra PP (2013) Estimates of bird collision mortality at wind facilities in the contiguous United States. Biol Cons 168:201–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Péron G, Hines JE, Nichols JD, Kendall WL, Peters KA, Mizrahi DS (2013) Estimation of bird and bat mortality at wind-power farms with superpopulation models. J Appl Ecol 50:902–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettersson J (2011) Night migration of songbirds and waterfowl at the Utgrunden off-shore wind farm—A radar-assisted study in southern Kalmar Sound. Report 6438, Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Bromma, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponce C, Alonso JC, Argandoña G, García Fernández A, Carrasco M (2010) Carcass removal by scavengers and search accuracy affect bird mortality estimates at power lines. Anim Cons 13:603–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org

  • Rydell J, Engström H, Hedenström A, Larsen JK, Pettersson J, Green M (2012) The effects of wind power on birds and bats: a synthesis. Report 6511, Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood KS (2007) Estimating wind turbine-caused bird mortality. J Wildl Manage 71:2781–2791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkelman JE (1992) De invloed van de Sep-proefwindcentrale te Oosterbierum (Fr.) op vogels. 1 Aanvaringsslachtoffers. RIN-rapport 92, Rijksinstituut voor Natuurbeheer, Arnhem

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Jan van der Kamp and Klaas van Dijk carried out most fatality searches. Furthermore, Mark Koopmans, Kim Meijer, Mirte Greve, Marten Sikkema, Janne Ouwehand, Reinder Wissman, Daan Vreugdenhil, Olga Stoker, Ronald de Jong and Franske Hoekema contributed to collecting fatality data. Olga, Ronald and Franske also edited GIS data and Franske made the maps. The students Gijsbert Knol and Andrea Vos contributed to the search and predation trials. Christa van der Weyde, Leo Bruinzeel and Elske Tielens helped in analyses and reporting and Marcel Kersten provided statistical and methodological support. We are also grateful to two anonymous referees for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allix Brenninkmeijer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brenninkmeijer, A., Klop, E. (2017). Bird Mortality in Two Dutch Wind Farms: Effects of Location, Spatial Design and Interactions with Powerlines. In: Köppel, J. (eds) Wind Energy and Wildlife Interactions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51272-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics