Mapping Rhetorical Topologies in Cognitive Neuroscience
Many tools that neuroscientists use to trace the complex topography of the human brain draw on the neuroscience literature to yield “metanalyses” or “syntheses of data.” These approaches conflate rhetorical connections in the literature with physical connections in the brain. By contrast, the model presented in this chapter seeks not a topography of the brain but a topology of neuroscience. A social network analysis of titles and abstracts for cognitive neuroscience articles yields a topology of brain regions and functions. This map can help researchers identify underresearched areas (e.g., the thalamus) or areas that are oversaturated (e.g., the amygdala). The map also helps researchers identify subdisciplines, such as “neuroeconomics,” that have not yet integrated with the broader field—“islands” where rhetorical work could yield benefits.
KeywordsSpecial Topic Anterior Cingulate Cortex Common Topic Social Network Analysis Cognitive Neuroscience
- Bloch, Joel. 2010. “A Concordance-Based Study of the Use of Reporting Verbs as Rhetorical Devices in Academic Papers.” Journal of Writing Research 2, no. 2: 219–244.Google Scholar
- Fan, Shelly. 2016. “Scientists Complete the Most Detailed Map of the Brain Ever.” SingularityHub, July 31. http://singularityhub.com/2016/07/31/scientists-complete-the-most-detailed-map-of-the-brain-ever.
- Gross, Alan G., Joseph E. Harmon, and Michael S. Reidy. 2002. Communicating Science: The Scientific Article from the 17th Century to the Present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- ———. 2016b. “The Extent of Engagement, the Means of Invention: Measuring Debate About Mirror Neurons in the Humanities and Social Sciences.” Journal of Science Communication 15, no. 2: 1–17.Google Scholar
- Heinen, S.J., et al. 2006. “An Oculomotor Decision Process Revealed by Function-al Magnetic Resonance Imaging.” Journal of Neuroscience 26, no. 52: 13515–13522.Google Scholar
- Hyland, Ken. 2005. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Johnson, Jenell and Melissa Littlefield. 2011. “Lost and Found in Translation: Popular Neuroscience in the Emerging Neurodisciplines.” In Sociological Reflections on the Neurosciences, ed. Martyn Pickersgill and Ira Van Keulen. 279–297. Wagon Lane: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
- Kanwisher, Nancy, Josh McDermott, and Marvin M. Chun. “The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception.” The Journal of Neuroscience 17, no. 11: 4302–4311.Google Scholar
- ———. 2000. “The Aristotelian Topos: Hunting for Novelty.” In Rereading Aristotle’s Rhetoric, ed. Alan G. Gross and Arthur E. Walzer. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
- Poldrack, Russel A., et al. 2011. “The Cognitive Atlas: Toward a Knowledge Foundation for Cognitive Neuroscience.” Frontiers in Neuroscience 5: 1–3.Google Scholar
- Prelli, Lawrence J. 1989. A Rhetoric of Science: Inventing Scientific Discourse. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar