Advertisement

Social Sustainability in Apparel Supply Chains: Organizational Practices for Managing Sub-Contracted Homework

  • Archana
  • Marsha A. DicksonEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

As the lowest level in the subcontracted supply chain, homeworkers are invisible and subject to exploitation. Existing codes of conduct and monitoring schemes favor the rights of the visible workforce employed in industrial settings in tier 1 factories. We conducted qualitative field research with the Self Employed Women’s Association’s (SEWA) embroidery center in New Delhi, India. Findings provide understanding of the sustainable management policies and practices that have been put in place to assure global buyers that homework can be carried out in ways consistent with standards for human rights, making it a protected component of sustainable supply chains.

Keywords

Supply chain Homework Management Social responsibility Sustainability 

References

  1. American Society of International Law. (1997). International labour conference: Home work convention, 1996 and recommendation concerning home work. International Legal Materials, 36(1), 55–64.Google Scholar
  2. Bhatt, E. R. (2006). We are poor but so many: The story of self-employed women in India. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bhatt, E., & Jhabvala, R. (2004). The idea of work. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(48), 5133–5140.Google Scholar
  4. Boris, E. (1989). Homework and women’s rights: The case of the Vermont knitters, 1980–85, in E. Boris & C. R. Daniels (Eds.) Homework: Historical and contemporary perspectives on paid labor at home (pp. 233–257). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brill, L. (2002). Can codes of conduct help home-based workers?, in R. Jenkins, R. Pearson, & G. Seyfang (Eds.) Corporate responsibility and labour rights: Codes of conduct in the global economy (pp. 113–123). London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  6. Burchielli, R., & Delaney, A. (2009). Homework and CSR: Can homeworkers benefit? In: 15th World Congress of the International Industrial Relations Association (IIRA), 24 August 2009–28 August 2009, Sydney Convention and Exhibition Centre.Google Scholar
  7. Buttle, M. (2008, 18 July). Homeworking in the Indian garment industry: What are the issues and how can homeworkers’ lives be improved. Retrieved 2011, 5 April from impact: http://www.impacttlimited.com/2008/07/18/homeworking-in-the-indian-garment-industry-what-are-the-issues-and-how-can-homeworkers-lives-be-improved/.
  8. Castka, P., & Balzarova, M. A. (2007). A critical look on quality through CSR lenses: Key challenges stemming from the development of ISO 26000. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 24(7), 738–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Castka, P., Bamber, C. J., Bamber, D. J., & Sharp, J. M. (2004). Integrating corporate social responsibility (CSR) into ISO management systems – in search of a feasible CSR management system framework. TQM Magazine, 16(3), 216–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Datta, R. (2003). From development to empowerment: The self-employed women’s association in India. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 16(3), 351–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Delaney, A. (2004). Global trade and home work: Closing the divide. Gender and Development, 12(2), 22–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Delaney, A. (n.a.). Accounting for corporate social responsibility: Does it benefit workers across the supply chain?Google Scholar
  13. Dickson, M. A., & Chang, R. K. (2015). Apparel manufacturers’ path to world class corporate social responsibility: Perspectives of CSR professionals, in T.-M. Choi & T. C. E. Cheng (Eds.) Sustainable fashion supply chain management (pp. 107–127). Springer: Switzerland.Google Scholar
  14. Dickson, M. A., Loker, S., & Eckman, M. (2009). Social responsibility in the global apparel industry. New York: Fairchild Books.Google Scholar
  15. ETI. (2010). Homeworkers and homeworking: An introduction. Retrieved 2011, 7 April from http://www.ethicaltrade.org/in-action/projects/homeworkers-project/guidelines.
  16. Freeman, D. (2003). Homeworkers in the global supply chains. Greener Management International, 43, 107–118.Google Scholar
  17. Green, N. L. (2003). Fashion, flexible specialization, and the sweatshop: A historical problem, in D. E. Bender & R. A. Greenwald (Eds.) Sweatshop USA: The American sweatshop in historical and global perspective (pp. 37–56). Routledge: New York.Google Scholar
  18. Hensman, R. (2005). Defending workers’ rights in subcontracted workplaces, in W. W. Worldwide, A. Hale, & J. Wills (Eds.) Threads of labour garment industry supply chains from the worker’s perspectives (Vol. 1, pp. 189–209). Blackwell Publishing Ltd: Malden, MA.Google Scholar
  19. Hurley, J., & Miller, D. (2005). The changing face of the global garment industry, in W. W. Worldwide, A. Hale, & J. Wills (Eds.) Threads of labour garment industry supply chains from the worker’s perspectives (Vol. I, pp. 16–39). Blackwell Publishing Ltd: Malden, MA.Google Scholar
  20. Kapoor, A. (2007). The SEWA way: Shaping another future for informal labour. Futures, 39: 554–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Littrell, M. A., & Dickson, M. A. (2010). Artisans and fair trade crafting development. Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  22. Marian, P. (2013, July 1). Harnessing homeworkers in the apparel supply chain. Available from www.just-style.com
  23. McCormick, D., & Schmitz, H. (2001). Manual for value chain research on homeworkers in the garment industry. Manual.Google Scholar
  24. SEWA Bharat. (2008–2009). 2008–09 SEWA Bharat. Annual Report. Annual Report, SEWA Bharat.Google Scholar
  25. Spodek, H. (1994). The self-employed women’s association (SEWA) in India: Feminist, Gandhian power in development. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 43(1), 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Strauss, A. C., & Corbin, J. M. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. SAGE Publications, Inc: Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
  27. Wilkinson-Weber, C. M. (1997). Skill, dependency, and differentiation: Artisans and agents in the Lucknow embroidery industry. Ethnology, 36(1), 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Williams, P. (2005). Leveraging change in the working conditions of the UK homeworkers. Development in Practice, 15(3/4), 546–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wills, J., & Hale, A. (2005). Threads of labour in the global garment industry, in A. Hale & J. Wills (Eds.) Threads of Labour: Garment Industry Supply Chains from the Worker’s Perspectives (Vol. 1, p. 266). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Fashion and Apparel StudiesUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations