Description of a Method for the Handling of Customer Needs in Logistics

  • Béla IllésEmail author
  • Róbert Skapinyecz
  • György Wagner
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


The paper describes the application of the QFD method, a technique used for the evaluation and proper realization of the different customer expectations, in the quality management of logistics systems. Both the theoretical basics of the method, as well as the main steps of its implementation are introduced. The implementation itself is presented with the help of a practical example that is strongly related to both the logistics and the automotive industries, as the latter especially relies on complex supply chains that require the extensive utilization of quality management tools. Besides the previous, the paper also provides an overview of all the possible areas of utilization for the QFD in the logistics industry. Therefore, the described method can have a great value from both the academic and the industrial perspectives.


Automotive Industry Logistics System Customer Relationship Management Quality Function Deployment Customer Expectation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



“This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 691942”. “This research was (partially) carried out in the framework of the Centre of Excellence of Mechatronics and Logistics at the University of Miskolc”.


  1. 1.
    Tamás P (2016) Application of value stream mapping at flexible manufacturing systems. Key Eng Mater 686:168–173Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kovács Gy (2012) Productivity improvement by lean manufacturing philosophy. Adv Logistic Syst: Theor Pract 6(1):9–16Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kovács Gy, Illés B (2011) Productivity improvement by application of lean manufacturing, conference proceeding, international scientific conference (MASXXI 2011), ISBN:978-959-250-693-0, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    QFD—quality function deployment/ausgearb. von der Arbeitsgruppe 132 “Quality Function Deployment”. Hrsg.: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Qualität e.V. (DGQ).—Berlin; Wien; Zürich: Beuth, 2001. DGQ-Band; 13–21 ISBN 3-410-32899-8Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Akao Y (1992) QFD—Quality Function Deployment: Wie die Japaner Kundenwünsche in Qualitätsprodukte umsetzen. Verlag Moderne Industrie, Landsberg. ISBN 3-478-91020-6Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    King B (1994) Doppelt so schnell wie die Konkurrenz; dt. Übersetzung: Kossmann; Hofstetter; Lange; Grohn; St. Gallen; gfmtGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kano N, Seraku N, Takuhashi F, Tsuji S (1984) Attractive quality and must-be-quality. Hinshitsu: J Japan Soc Qual Control 39–48Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tamás P (2016) Application of simulation modeling for formation of pull-principled production control system. J Prod Eng 19(1):99–102Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Béla Illés
    • 1
    Email author
  • Róbert Skapinyecz
    • 1
  • György Wagner
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MiskolcMiskolcHungary

Personalised recommendations