Advertisement

Researching Individual Satisfaction with Group Decisions in Tourism: Experimental Evidence

  • Amra Delic
  • Julia Neidhardt
  • Laurens Rook
  • Hannes Werthner
  • Markus Zanker
Conference paper

Abstract

The goal of the present study was to investigate how satisfied individuals are with the final outcome of a group decision-making process on a joint travel destination. Using an experimental paradigm (N total = 200, N groups = 55) it was obvious to hypothesize that individuals would especially be satisfied with the final group decision when it matched their own initial travel preference and that they would be dissatisfied in case it mismatched their initial preference. However, in addition the influence of personality and group dynamics differences (Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument, Five Factor Model) as well as travel types of the individual decision maker on the satisfaction level with the group decision outcome as the dependent variable were further researched. The paper concludes with implications for e-tourism, especially with regards to the development of interactive tools for group travel.

Keywords

Group decision making Recommending to groups Personality Traveller types 

References

  1. DeChurch, L. A., & Mesmer-Magnus, J. R. (2010). The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 32–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Delic, A. (2016). Picture-based approach to group recommender systems in e-tourism domain. In Conference Proceedings of the 24th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization (UMAP 2016), Halifax, Canada.Google Scholar
  3. Delic, A., Neidhardt, J., Nguyen, T.N., & Ricci, F. (2016a). Research methods for group recommender systems. In Proceedings of RecTour 2016.Google Scholar
  4. Delic, A., Neidhardt, J., Nguyen, T.N., Ricci, F., Rook, L., Werthner, H., & Zanker, M. (2016b). Observing group decision making processes. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender systems (RecSys 2016), Boston, MA, USA, ACM.Google Scholar
  5. De Dreu, C. K. W., & Van de Vliert, E. (1997). Using conflict in organizations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 741–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Donnellan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). The mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 192–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Felfernig, A., Gordea, S., Jannach, D., Teppan, E., & Zanker, M. (2007). A short survey of recommendation technologies in travel and tourism. OEGAI Journal, 25(7), 17–22.Google Scholar
  9. Forsyth, D. R. (2014). Group dynamics. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  10. Gibson, H., & Yiannakis, A. (2002). Tourist roles, needs and the lifecourse. Annals of Tourism Research, 29(2), 358–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gorman, J. C. (2014). Team coordination and dynamics: Two central issues. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(5), 355–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harvey, J. B. (1988). The Abilene paradox: The management of agreement (pp. 17–43). Summer: Organizational Dynamics.Google Scholar
  13. Kerr, N. L., & Tindale, R. S. (2004). Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 22.1–22.32.Google Scholar
  14. Kozlowski, S. W., & Klein, K. J. (2000). Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  15. Masthoff, J. (2015). Group recommender systems: Aggregation, satisfaction and group attributes. In F. Ricci, L. Rokach, & B. Shapira (Eds.), Recommender Systems Handbook (pp. 743–776). Springer.Google Scholar
  16. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the Five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the Five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 175–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Neidhardt, J., Schuster, R., Seyfang, L., & Werthner, H. (2014). Eliciting the users’ unknown preferences. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Recommender systems (RecSys 2014) (pp. 309–312). ACM.Google Scholar
  19. Neidhardt, J., Seyfang, L., Schuster, R., & Werthner, H. (2015). A picture-based approach to recommender systems. Information Technology & Tourism, 15(1), 49–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nguyen, T. N., & Ricci, F. (2016). Supporting group decision making with recommendations and explanations. In Posters, Demos, Late-breaking Results and Workshop Proceedings of the 24th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization (UMAP 2016). Halifax, Canada.Google Scholar
  21. Thomas, K. W., & Kilmann, R. H. (2010). Thomas-Kilmann conflict mode instrument profile and interpretative report. Sunnyvale, CA: CPP Inc.Google Scholar
  22. Van Lange, P. A. M. (1999). The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(2), 337–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Van Lange, P. A. M., Balliet, D., Parks, C. D., & Van Vugt, M. (2014). Social dilemmas: The psychology of human cooperation. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Werthner, H., Alzua-Sorzabal, A., Cantoni, L., Dickinger, A., Gretzel, U., Jannach, D., et al. (2015). Future research issues in it and tourism. Information Technology & Tourism, 15(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. White, C. M., Hafenbraedl, S., Hoffrage, U., Reisen, N., & Woike, J. K. (2011). Are groups more likely to defer choice than their members? Judgment and Decision Making, 6(3), 239–251.Google Scholar
  26. Wood, V. F., & Bell, P. A. (2008). Predicting interpersonal conflict resolution styles from personality characteristics. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(2), 126–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amra Delic
    • 1
  • Julia Neidhardt
    • 1
  • Laurens Rook
    • 2
  • Hannes Werthner
    • 1
  • Markus Zanker
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Informatics/E-Commerce GroupTU WienAustria
  2. 2.Faculty of Technology, Policy and ManagementDelft University of TechnologyDelftNetherlands
  3. 3.Faculty of Computer ScienceFree University of Bozen-BolzanoBolzanoItaly

Personalised recommendations