Advertisement

How “Bad” Are You? Justification and Normalisation of Online Deviant Customer Behaviour

  • Marianna Sigala
Conference paper

Abstract

The study investigates online Deviant Customer Behaviour (DCB). Multidisciplinary research on neutralisation techniques justifying DCB was reviewed and expanded for considering the Internet context. Data collected from a convenience sample revealed four clusters of people exhibiting distinct behaviour engagement patterns of online DCB that they do not perceive them as ‘wrong’. Respondents did not claim to be ‘bad online users’ despite their engagement in online DCB. Instead of the number and level of engagement in online DCB, it was the level of perceived wrongness of online DCB that was found to statistically significantly relate to the respondents’ self-assessment level of being a ‘bad online user’. Findings about respondents’ perceptions of various neutralisation techniques revealed that respondents use different neutralisation techniques for justifying and adopting different online DCB. Findings provide useful implications for developing tailored deterrence management strategies for addressing the neutralisation techniques enforcing the enactment of different online DCB.

Keywords

Deviant customer behaviour Fake reviews Normalisation Justification Neutralisation techniques 

References

  1. Akoglu, L., Chandy, R., & Faloutsos, C. (2013). Opinion fraud detection in online reviews by network effects. ICWSM, 13, 2–11.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 248–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193–209.Google Scholar
  4. Banerjee, S., & Chua, A. Y. (2016). In search of patterns among travellers’ hotel ratings in TripAdvisor. Tourism Management, 53, 125–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blasi, A. (1984). Moral identity: Its role in moral functioning. In W. Kurtines & J. Gewirtz (Eds.), Morality, moral behavior and moral development (pp. 128–139). NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Bonner, S., & O’Higgins, E. (2010). Music piracy: Ethical perspectives. Management Decisions, 48(9), 1341–1354.Google Scholar
  7. Chen, L., Zhou, Y., & Chiu, D. M. (2015). Analysis and detection of fake views in online video services. ACM Transactions, 11(2s), 44.Google Scholar
  8. Cialdini, R. B. (1988). Influence. New York, NY: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  9. Coleman, J. W. (1994). Neutralization theory: An empirical application and assessment. PhD thesis, Oklahoma State University Stillwater, OK.Google Scholar
  10. Cromwell, P., & Thurman, Q. (2003). The devil made me do it: Use of neutralizations by shoplifters. Deviant Behavior, 24(6), 535–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Daunt, K. L., Harris, L. C. (2011). Customers acting badly: Evidence from the hospitality industry. Journal of Business Research, 64(10), 1034–1042.Google Scholar
  12. Dinhopl, A., & Gretzel, U. (2016). Selfie-taking as touristic looking. Annals of Tourism Research, 57, 126–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dolan, R., Conduit, J., & Fahy, J. (2016). Social media engagement: A construct of positively and negatively valenced engagement behaviour.Google Scholar
  14. Dootson, P., Johnston, K. A., Beatson, A., & Lings, I. (2016). Where do consumers draw the line? Factors informing perceptions and justifications of deviant consumer behaviour. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(7–8), 750–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Filieri, R., Alguezaui, S., & McLeay, F. (2015). Why do travelers trust TripAdvisor? Antecedents of trust towards consumer-generated media and its influence on recommendation adoption and word of mouth. Tourism Management, 51, 174–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fullerton, R. A., & Punj, G. (2004). Repercussions of promoting an ideology of consumption: Consumer misbehavior. Journal of Business Research, 57, 1239–1249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harris, L. C., & Dumas, A. (2009). Online consumer misbehaviour: An application of neutralization theory. Marketing Theory, 9(4), 379–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Henry, S. (1990). Degrees of deviance, student accounts of their deviant behavior. Salem, WI: Sheffield Publishing.Google Scholar
  19. Jin, G., & Leslie, P. (2009). Reputational incentives for restaurant hygiene. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 1(1), 237–267.Google Scholar
  20. Kim, J., Watson, J., & Kirmani, A. (2015). Red Flag! The effect of fake reviews on consumer evaluations. NA-Advances in Consumer Research, 43.Google Scholar
  21. Klockers, C. B. (1974). The professional fence. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  22. Liu, B., Pennington-Gray, L., Donohoe, H., & Omodior, O. (2015). New York City bed bug crisis as framed by tourists on TripAdvisor. Tourism Analysis, 20(2), 243–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Luca, M. (2011). Reviews, reputation, and revenue: The case of Yelp.com. Harvard Business School NOM Unit Working Paper (12-016).Google Scholar
  24. Luca, M., & Zervas, G. (2016). Fake it till you make it: Reputation, competition, and Yelp review fraud. Management Science.Google Scholar
  25. Magasic, M. (2016). The ‘Selfie Gaze’ and ‘Social Media Pilgrimage’. In A. Inversini & R. Schegg (Eds.), ICT in Tourism 2016.Google Scholar
  26. Marshall, T. C., Lefringhausen, K., & Ferenczi, N. (2015). The Big Five, self-esteem, and narcissism as predictors of the topics people write about in Facebook status updates. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mayzlin, D., Dover, Y., & Chevalier, J. A. (2012). Promotional reviews: An empirical investigation of online review manipulation. Working Paper # 18340. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  28. Mayzlin, D., Dover, Y., & Chevalier, J. (2014). Promotional reviews: An empirical investigation of online review manipulation. American Economic Review, 104(8), 2421–2455.Google Scholar
  29. Mazar, N., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research, 45, 633–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McGregor, S. L. T. (2008). Conceptualizing immoral and unethical consumption using neutralization theory. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 36(3), 261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Munzel, A. (2016). Assisting consumers in detecting fake reviews: Role of identity information disclosure and consensus. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 32, 96–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Neale, L., & Fullerton, S. (2010). The international search for ethics norms: Which behaviors do consumers consider un(acceptable)? Journal of Services Marketing, 24(6), 476–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. O’Connor, P. (2010). Managing a Hotel’s Image on TripAdvisor. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 19(7), 754–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Qiu, L., Lu, J., Yang, S., Qu, W., & Zhu, T. (2015). What does your selfie say about you? Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 443–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schuckert, M., Liu, X., & Law, R. (2015). Hospitality and tourism online reviews: Recent trends and future directions. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 32(5), 608–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schuckert, M., Liu, X., & Law, R. (2016). Insights into suspicious online ratings: direct evidence from TripAdvisor. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 21(3), 259–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sorokowski, P., Sorokowska, A., Oleszkiewicz, A., Frackowiak, T., Huk, A., & Pisanski, K. (2015). Selfie posting behaviors are associated with narcissism among men. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 123–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Taylor, D. G., Taylor, D. G., Strutton, D., & Strutton, D. (2016). Does Facebook usage lead to conspicuous consumption? The role of envy, narcissism and self-promotion. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 10(3), 231–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Weiser, E. B. (2015). #Me: Narcissism and its facets as predictors of selfie-posting frequency. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 477–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wilkes, R. E. (1978). Fraudulent behavior by consumers. Journal of Marketing, 42(4), 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yoo, K. H. & Gretzel, U. (2009). Comparison of deceptive and truthful travel reviews. In ICT in tourism 2009 proceedings Amsterdam (pp. 37–47). Vienna: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Management, Business SchoolUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations