Advertisement

Virtual Reality and Attitudes Toward Tourism Destinations

  • Iis P. TussyadiahEmail author
  • Dan Wang
  • Chenge (Helen) Jia
Conference paper

Abstract

Recent developments in Virtual Reality (VR) technology present a tremendous opportunity for the tourism industry. This research aims to better understand how the VR experience may influence travel decision making by investigating spatial presence in VR environments and its impact on attitudes toward tourism destinations. Based on a study involving virtual walkthrough of tourism destinations with 202 participants, two dimensions of spatial presence were identified: being somewhere other than the actual environment and self-location in a VR environment. The analysis revealed that users’ attention allocation to VR environments contributed significantly to spatial presence. It was also found that spatial presence positively affects post VR attitude change toward tourism destinations, indicating the persuasiveness of VR. No significant differences were found across VR stimuli (devices) and across prior visitation.

Keywords

Virtual reality Spatial presence Attitude change Virtual tourism Non-travel 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors received financial support from the School of Hotel & Tourism Management, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (Grant #1-ZVH2).

References

  1. Burke, R. (1996). Virtual shopping: Breakthrough in marketing research. Harvard Business Review, 74, 120–131.Google Scholar
  2. Bystrom, K.-E., Barfield, W., & Hendrix, C. (1999). A conceptual model of the sense of presence in virtual environments. Presence, 8(2), 241–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cheong, R. (1995). The virtual threat to travel and tourism. Tourism Management, 16(6), 417–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dewailly, J.-M. (1999). Sustainable tourist space: From reality to virtual reality? Tourism Geographies, 1(1), 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Draper, J. V., Kaber, D. B., & Usher, J. M. (1998). Telepresence. Human Factors, 40, 354–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. eMarketer. (2015). Virtual Reality Interest Highest among Gen Z. http://www.emarketer.com/Article/Virtual-Reality-Interest-Highest-Among-Gen-Z/1013295.
  7. Global Web Index. (2016). 4 in 10 16–34 s interested in VR. http://www.globalwebindex.net/blog/4-in-10-16-34s-interested-in-vr.
  8. Guttentag, D. A. (2010). Virtual reality: Applications and implications for tourism. Tourism Management, 30(5), 637–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huang, Y. C., Backman, K. F., Backman, S. J., & Chang, L. L. (2016). Exploring the implications of virtual reality technology in tourism marketing: An integrated research framework. International Journal of Tourism Research, 18, 116–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hyun, M. Y., & O’Keefe, R. M. (2012). Virtual destination image: Testing a telepresence model. Journal of Business Research, 65, 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kim, T., & Biocca, F. (1997). Telepresence via television: Two dimensions of telepresence may have different connections to memory and persuasion. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2), n.p.Google Scholar
  12. Klein, L. R. (2003). Creating virtual product experiences: The role of telepresence. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 17(1), 41–55. doi: 10.1002/dir.10046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Leonardis, D., Frisoli, A., Barsotti, M., Carrozzino, M., & Bergamasco, M. (2014). Multisensory feedback can enhance embodiment within an enriched virtual walking scenario. Presence, 23(3), 253–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mania, K., & Chalmers, A. (2001). The effects of levels of immersion on memory and presence in virtual environments: A reality centered approach. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4(2), 247–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ruddle, R. A., Payne, S. J., & Jones, D. M. (1999). Navigating large-scale virtual environments: What differences occur between helmet-mounted and desk-top displays? Presence, 8(2), 157–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Slater, M., & Usoh, M. (1993). Representations systems, perceptual position, and presence in immersive virtual environments. Presence, 2(3), 221–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Slater, M., Usoh, M., & Steed, A. (1994). Depth of presence in virtual environments. Presence, 3, 130–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Steuer, J. S. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42, 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Suh, K.-S., & Lee, Y. E. (2005). The effects of virtual reality on consumer learning: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 29(4), 673–697.Google Scholar
  20. Vorderer, P., Wirth, W., Gouveia, F. R., Biocca, F., Saari, T., Jäncke, F., … & Jäncke, P. (2004). MEC Spatial Presence Questionnaire (MEC-SPQ): Short documentation and instructions for application. Report to the European Community, Project Presence: MEC (IST-2001-37661). Retrieved from http://www.ijk.hmt-hannover.de/presence.
  21. Weibel, D., Schmutz, J., Pahud, O., & Wissmath, B. (2015). Measuring spatial presence: Introducing and validating the pictorial presence SAM. Presence, 24(1), 44–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Williams, P. (2006). Tourism and hospitality marketing: Fantasy, feeling and fun. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(2), 482–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Williams, P., & Hobson, J. S. P. (1995). Virtual reality and tourism: Fact or fantasy? Tourism Management, 16(6), 423–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wirth, W., Hartmann, T., Böcking, S., Vorderer, P., Klimmt, C., Schramm, H., … & Jäncke, P. (2007). A process model of the formation of spatial presence experiences. Media Psychology, 9, 493–525.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iis P. Tussyadiah
    • 1
    Email author
  • Dan Wang
    • 2
  • Chenge (Helen) Jia
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Hospitality Business Management Carson College of BusinessWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA
  2. 2.School of Hotel & Tourism ManagementThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations