Skip to main content

Marxism and General Psychology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Catching Up With Aristotle

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Psychology ((BRIEFSTHEORET))

  • 513 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter narrates how in the wake of a resurgence of Marxist Enlightenment in European universities in the 1970s, the Danish general psychology project was greatly facilitated by the discovery of Lev S. Vygotsky and his Cultural-historical activity theory school. In particular, how Alexei N. Leontiev’s psycho-phylogenetic activity model as a virtual mirror image of Aristotle’s bio-psychological taxonomy became a key? The author’s suggested model of general psychology is a combination of Aristotle’s and Leontiev’s models and presented in the end.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Vygotsky (1927, 1997, p. 330).

  2. 2.

    Marx (1845, 3).

  3. 3.

    Fukuyama (1992).

  4. 4.

    Marx and Engels (1848).

  5. 5.

    Vygotsky (1978, p. 8).

  6. 6.

    Leontiev (1997, p. 25).

  7. 7.

    Luria (1976).

  8. 8.

    Luria (1966).

  9. 9.

    In Wertsch (1985, p. 90).

  10. 10.

    Leontiev and Leontiev (2003).

  11. 11.

    That which is to be explained and not merely that which explains.

  12. 12.

    Gazzaniga (1998, pp. xi–xii).

  13. 13.

    Mammen and Mironenko (2015).

  14. 14.

    Leontiev (1981).

  15. 15.

    Spencer (1870, p. 291).

  16. 16.

    I am not an Aristotle scholar. The ideas Aristotle’s work evoked, rather than what he precisely said and meant, have been my guide. This, of course, is the usual way great works have been received and made the base of progress when built upon by subsequent generations, they fall victim to interpretation, construal, and free associations.

  17. 17.

    Engelsted (1980).

References

  • Engelsted, N. (1980). Psychogenesis. Description of the road to a project [in Danish]. Psyke & Logos, nr., 1, 91–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. New York: Avon Books Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazzaniga, M. S. (1998). The Mind’s past. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontiev, A. N. (1981). Problems in the development of mind. Moscow: Progress Publishers. http://marxists.anu.edu.au/archive/leontev/works/development-mind.pdf

  • Leontiev, A. N. (1997). On Vygotsky’s creative development, an introduction. Quoted from Rieber, R. W. & Wollock, J. (Eds.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky (Vol. 3). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontiev, A. A., & Leontiev, D. A. (2003). A Myth about a falling out. In Leontiev, A. N. & Vygotsky, L. S. (Eds.), in 1932, Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal (Vol. 24(1), pp. 14–28).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R. (1966). Higher cortical functions in man. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R. (1976). Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations. U.S.A: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mammen, J., & Mironenko, I. (2015). Activity theories and the ontology of psychology: Learning from Danish and Russian Experiences. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1845). Theses on Feuerbach. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/theses/theses.htm

  • Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1848). Communist Manifesto, 1. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Manifesto.pdf

  • Spencer, H. (1870). The principles of psychology (2nd ed.). William and Norgate: London & Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1927). The historical meaning of the crisis in psychology: A methodological investigation. In Rieber, The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky: Problems of the theory and history of psychology. Springer, 1997. www.marxists.org/archive/vygotsky/works/crisis/

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Unpublished notebook. In Cole, M. & Scribner, S. (Eds.), L.S. Vygotsky. Mind in society. USA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The collected works (Vol. 4). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. USA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niels Engelsted .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Engelsted, N. (2017). Marxism and General Psychology. In: Catching Up With Aristotle . SpringerBriefs in Psychology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51088-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics