Knowledge Sharing System Under Open Project Perspective: Chinese Experience

Part of the Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning book series (IAKM, volume 5)


Knowledge sharing is considered as a main driver for successful project management, especially in an open perspective. This chapter is focused on the practical evidence of China’s knowledge sharing system from the institutional and organizational perspectives. At the institutional level, the authors point out the government regulation to construct a system of specific Chinese knowledge sharing mode between firms, universities, research institutions and market allowing the success of open model. At the organizational perspective, the analysis underlines the progressive building of knowledge sharing system in China at the example of Huawei case study.


Knowledge sharing system Open project perspective Innovation China Case study 


  1. Abrami, R. M., Kirby, W., & McFarlan, F. W. (2014, March). Why china can’t innovate. Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
  2. Albino, V., Garavelli, A. C., & Schiuma, G. (1999). Knowledge transfer and inter-firm relationships in industrial districts: The role of the leader firm. Technovation, 19, 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Binz-Scharf, M. Ch., (2003). Exploration and exploitation: Toward a theory of knowledge sharing in digital government projects. Dissertation. Gallen: Universität St. Gallen.Google Scholar
  4. Bogers, M. (2012). Knowledge sharing in open innovation: An overview of theoretical perspectives on collaborative innovation. In C. P. Heredero & D. Lopez (Eds.), Open innovation at firms and public administrations: Technologies for value creation (pp. 1–14). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bosua, R., & Scheepers, R. (2007). Towards a model to explain knowledge sharing in complex organizational environments. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 5(2), 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bresman, H., Birkenshaw, J., & Nobel, R. (1999). Knowledge transfer in international acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(3), 439–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buganza, T., & Verganti, R. (2009). Open innovation process to inbound knowledge: Collaboration with universities in four leading firms. European Journal of Innovation Management, 12(3), 306–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bukowitz, W. R., & Williams, R. L. (1999). The knowledge management fieldbook. London: FT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Caloghirou, Y., Kastelli, I., & Tsakanikas, A. (2004). Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: Complements or substitutes for innovative performance? Technovation, 24, 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, D., & Li-Hua, R. (2011). Modes of technological leapfrogging: Five case studies from China. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 28(1), 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, J., & Qu, W. G. (2003). A new technological learning in China. Technovation, 23(11), 861–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen, J., Wu, H., & Jin, J. (2012). How firms implement open innovation: From the perspective of organizational change. Journal of China University of Geosciences (Social Science Edition), 12(1), 74–80.Google Scholar
  13. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  14. Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open Innovation: A new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. In H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, & J. West (Eds.), Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm (pp. 1–12). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Chesbrough, H., & Crowther, A. K. (2006). Beyond high-tech: Early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management, 36(3), 229–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chesbrough, H. W. & Teece, D. J. (1996). Organizing for innovation: When is virtual virtuous? Harvard Business Review, August 2002, The Innovative Enterprise, 127–135.Google Scholar
  17. Chiaroni, D., Chiesa, V., & Frattini, F. (2010). Unravelling the process from closed to open Innovation: Evidence from mature, asset-intensive industries. R&D Management, 40(3), 222–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Contractor, F. J., & Sagafi-Nejad, T. (1981). International technology transfer: Major issues and policy responses. Journal of International Business Studies, 12(2), 113–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Contractor, N., Carley, K., Levitt, R., Monge, P. R., Wasserman, S., Bar, F., et al. (2000). Co-evolution of knowledge networks and 21st century organizational forms: Computational modeling and empirical testing. Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  20. Cummings, J. (2003). Knowledge sharing: A review of the literature. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  21. Deng, P. (2009). Why do Chinese firms tend to acquire strategic assets in international expansion? Journal of World Business, 44(1), 74–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Enkel, E., Gassmann, O., & Chesbrough, H. (2009). Open R&D and open innovation: Exploring the phenomenon. R&D Management, 39(4), 311–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gassmann, O., & Enkel, E. (2004). Towards a theory of open innovation: Three core process archetypes. R&D Management Conference, 6 July, Lisabon, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  24. Glasson, J., Chadwick, A., & Lawton-Smith, H. (2006). Defining, explaining and managing high-tech growth: The case of Oxfordshire. European Planning Studies, 14(4), 503–524.
  25. Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (1991). Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 768–792.Google Scholar
  27. Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hung, S. W. (2009). Development and innovation in the IT industries of India and China. Technology in Society, 31(1), 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kirschbaum, R. (2005). Open innovation in practice. Research-Technology Management, 48(4), 24–28.Google Scholar
  30. Kostova, T. (1999). Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 308–324.Google Scholar
  31. Lichtenthaler, U. (2011). Open innovation: Past research, current debates, and future directions. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(1), 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liebowitz, S. (2002). Rethinking the networked economy: The true forces driving the digital marketplace. Dallas, TX: AMACOM Division of the American Management Association.Google Scholar
  33. Liu, X. (2010). Can international acquisition be an effective way to boost innovation in developing countries? Evidences from China’s TFT-LCD industry. Journal of Science and Technology Policy in China, 1(2), 116–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Li-Ying, J., & Wang, Y. (2014). Find them home or abroad? The relative contribution of international technology in-licensing to “Indigenous Innovation” in China. Long Range Planning.
  35. Mansfield, E., Romeo, A., & Wagner, S. (1979). Foreign trade and US research and development. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 49–57.Google Scholar
  36. Naqshbandi, M., & Kaur, S. (2011). A study of organizational citizenship behaviours, organizational structures and open innovation. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(6), 182–193.Google Scholar
  37. Nonaka, I. (1991, November–December). The knowledge creating company. Harvard Business Review, 96.Google Scholar
  38. Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2003). The knowledge created theory revisited: Knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 1(1), 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University-industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Review, 9(4), 259–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Powell, W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336.Google Scholar
  41. Rousseau, D. M. (1985). Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7(1), 1–37.Google Scholar
  42. Savitskaya, I., Salmi, P., & Torkkeli, M. (2010). Barriers to open innovation: Case China. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 5(4), 10–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Spencer, J. (2003). Firms’ knowledge-sharing strategies in the global innovation system: Empirical evident from the flat panel display industry. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 217–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Teece, D., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tsai, W. (2002). Social structure of “coopetition” within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science, 13(2), 179–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Verspagen, B., & Duysters, G. (2004). The small worlds of strategic technology alliances. Technovation, 24(7), 563–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wang, Y., & Li-Yinag, J. (2014). When does inward technological licensing facilitate firm’s NPD performance? A contingency perspective. Technovation, 34, 44–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. West, J., Salter, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Chesbrough, H. (2014). Open innovation: The next decade. Research Policy, 43(5), 805–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zander, U. (1991). Exploiting a technological edge: Voluntary and involuntary dissemination of technology. Doctoral dissertation. Stockholm: Institute of International Business.Google Scholar
  51. Žemaitis, E. (2014). Knowledge management in open innovation paradigm context: High tech sector perspective. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, 164–173.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LITEMUniversity Evry Val-d’EssonneEvry CedexFrance
  2. 2.Central University of Finance and EconomicsBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations